Cargando…

Local Production of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor‐1 in the Coronary Circulation Is Associated With Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Humans

BACKGROUND: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a proinflammatory biomarker associated with immune activation and fibrinolysis inhibition. Plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI‐1) is associated with excessive fibrin accumulation, thrombus formation, and atherosclerosis. The re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corban, Michel T., Prasad, Abhiram, Nesbitt, Lisa, Loeffler, Darrell, Herrmann, Joerg, Lerman, Lilach O., Lerman, Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009881
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a proinflammatory biomarker associated with immune activation and fibrinolysis inhibition. Plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI‐1) is associated with excessive fibrin accumulation, thrombus formation, and atherosclerosis. The relationship between cross‐coronary suPAR and PAI‐1 production and endothelial dysfunction remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy‐nine patients (age 53±10 years, 75% women) with angina and normal coronary arteries or mild coronary artery disease (<40% stenosis) on angiogram underwent acetylcholine assessment of epicardial endothelial dysfunction (mid–left anterior descending coronary artery diameter decrease >20% after acetylcholine) and mircovascular endothelial dysfunction (coronary blood flow change <50% after acetylcholine). Simultaneous left main and coronary sinus suPAR and PAI‐1 levels were measured in each patient before acetylcholine administration, and cross‐coronary suPAR and PAI‐1 production rates were calculated. Patients’ characteristics, except for age (51±10 versus 57±9, P=0.02), and resting coronary hemodynamics were not significantly different between patients with (26%) versus without (74%) epicardial endothelial dysfunction. Patients’ characteristics and resting coronary hemodynamics were not significantly different between those with (62%) and those without (38%) mircovascular endothelial dysfunction. Patients with mircovascular endothelial dysfunction demonstrated local coronary suPAR production versus suPAR extraction in patients with normal microvascular function (median 25.8 [interquartile range 121.6, −23.7] versus −12.7 [52.0, −74.8] ng/min, P=0.03). Patients with epicardial endothelial dysfunction had higher median coronary PAI‐1 production rates compared with those with normal epicardial endothelial function (1224.7 [12 940.7, −1915.4] versus −187.4 [4444.7, −4535.8] ng/min, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: suPAR is released in coronary circulation of patients with mircovascular endothelial dysfunction and extracted in those with normal microvascular function. Cross‐coronary PAI‐1 release is higher in humans with epicardial endothelial dysfunction.