Cargando…

Systematic Review of Studies That Have Evaluated Screening Tests in Relatives of Patients Affected by Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Disease

BACKGROUND: Nonsyndromic thoracic aortic diseases (NS‐TADs) are often silent entities until they present as life‐threatening emergencies. Despite familial inheritance being common, screening is not the current standard of care in NS‐TADs. We sought to determine the incidence of aortic diseases, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariscalco, Giovanni, Debiec, Radoslaw, Elefteriades, John A., Samani, Nilesh J., Murphy, Gavin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009302
_version_ 1783365509992939520
author Mariscalco, Giovanni
Debiec, Radoslaw
Elefteriades, John A.
Samani, Nilesh J.
Murphy, Gavin J.
author_facet Mariscalco, Giovanni
Debiec, Radoslaw
Elefteriades, John A.
Samani, Nilesh J.
Murphy, Gavin J.
author_sort Mariscalco, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonsyndromic thoracic aortic diseases (NS‐TADs) are often silent entities until they present as life‐threatening emergencies. Despite familial inheritance being common, screening is not the current standard of care in NS‐TADs. We sought to determine the incidence of aortic diseases, the predictive accuracy of available screening tests, and the effectiveness of screening programs in relatives of patients affected by NS‐TADs. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search on PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to the end of December 2017. The search was supplemented with the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database. A total of 53 studies were included, and a total of 2696 NS‐TAD relatives were screened. Screening was genetic in 49% of studies, followed by imaging techniques in 11% and a combination of the 2 in 40%. Newly affected individuals were identified in 33%, 24%, and 15% of first‐, second‐, and third‐degree relatives, respectively. Familial NS‐TADs were primarily attributed to single‐gene mutations, expressed in an autosomal dominant pattern with incomplete penetrance. Specific gene mutations were observed in 25% of the screened families. Disease subtype and genetic mutations stratified patients with respect to age of presentation, aneurysmal location, and aortic diameter before dissection. Relatives of patients with sporadic NS‐TADs were also found to be affected. No studies evaluated the predictive accuracy of imaging or genetic screening tests, or the clinical or cost‐effectiveness of an NS‐TAD screening program. CONCLUSIONS: First‐ and second‐degree relatives of patients affected by both familial and sporadic NS‐TADs may benefit from personalized screening programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6201478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62014782018-10-31 Systematic Review of Studies That Have Evaluated Screening Tests in Relatives of Patients Affected by Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Disease Mariscalco, Giovanni Debiec, Radoslaw Elefteriades, John A. Samani, Nilesh J. Murphy, Gavin J. J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Nonsyndromic thoracic aortic diseases (NS‐TADs) are often silent entities until they present as life‐threatening emergencies. Despite familial inheritance being common, screening is not the current standard of care in NS‐TADs. We sought to determine the incidence of aortic diseases, the predictive accuracy of available screening tests, and the effectiveness of screening programs in relatives of patients affected by NS‐TADs. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search on PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to the end of December 2017. The search was supplemented with the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database. A total of 53 studies were included, and a total of 2696 NS‐TAD relatives were screened. Screening was genetic in 49% of studies, followed by imaging techniques in 11% and a combination of the 2 in 40%. Newly affected individuals were identified in 33%, 24%, and 15% of first‐, second‐, and third‐degree relatives, respectively. Familial NS‐TADs were primarily attributed to single‐gene mutations, expressed in an autosomal dominant pattern with incomplete penetrance. Specific gene mutations were observed in 25% of the screened families. Disease subtype and genetic mutations stratified patients with respect to age of presentation, aneurysmal location, and aortic diameter before dissection. Relatives of patients with sporadic NS‐TADs were also found to be affected. No studies evaluated the predictive accuracy of imaging or genetic screening tests, or the clinical or cost‐effectiveness of an NS‐TAD screening program. CONCLUSIONS: First‐ and second‐degree relatives of patients affected by both familial and sporadic NS‐TADs may benefit from personalized screening programs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6201478/ /pubmed/30371227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009302 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Mariscalco, Giovanni
Debiec, Radoslaw
Elefteriades, John A.
Samani, Nilesh J.
Murphy, Gavin J.
Systematic Review of Studies That Have Evaluated Screening Tests in Relatives of Patients Affected by Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Disease
title Systematic Review of Studies That Have Evaluated Screening Tests in Relatives of Patients Affected by Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Disease
title_full Systematic Review of Studies That Have Evaluated Screening Tests in Relatives of Patients Affected by Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Disease
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Studies That Have Evaluated Screening Tests in Relatives of Patients Affected by Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Disease
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Studies That Have Evaluated Screening Tests in Relatives of Patients Affected by Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Disease
title_short Systematic Review of Studies That Have Evaluated Screening Tests in Relatives of Patients Affected by Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Disease
title_sort systematic review of studies that have evaluated screening tests in relatives of patients affected by nonsyndromic thoracic aortic disease
topic Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009302
work_keys_str_mv AT mariscalcogiovanni systematicreviewofstudiesthathaveevaluatedscreeningtestsinrelativesofpatientsaffectedbynonsyndromicthoracicaorticdisease
AT debiecradoslaw systematicreviewofstudiesthathaveevaluatedscreeningtestsinrelativesofpatientsaffectedbynonsyndromicthoracicaorticdisease
AT elefteriadesjohna systematicreviewofstudiesthathaveevaluatedscreeningtestsinrelativesofpatientsaffectedbynonsyndromicthoracicaorticdisease
AT samaninileshj systematicreviewofstudiesthathaveevaluatedscreeningtestsinrelativesofpatientsaffectedbynonsyndromicthoracicaorticdisease
AT murphygavinj systematicreviewofstudiesthathaveevaluatedscreeningtestsinrelativesofpatientsaffectedbynonsyndromicthoracicaorticdisease