Cargando…
Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?
BACKGROUND: While enrolling dyads in research studies is not uncommon, there is limited literature on the utility of different recruitment strategies and the resulting selection biases. This paper examined two recruitment strategies used to enroll military couples in a longitudinal study, assessing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0575-x |
_version_ | 1783365513851699200 |
---|---|
author | McMaster, Hope Seib Stander, Valerie A. Williams, Christianna S. Woodall, Kelly A. O’Malley, Christopher A. Bauer, Lauren M. Davila, Evelyn P. |
author_facet | McMaster, Hope Seib Stander, Valerie A. Williams, Christianna S. Woodall, Kelly A. O’Malley, Christopher A. Bauer, Lauren M. Davila, Evelyn P. |
author_sort | McMaster, Hope Seib |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While enrolling dyads in research studies is not uncommon, there is limited literature on the utility of different recruitment strategies and the resulting selection biases. This paper examined two recruitment strategies used to enroll military couples in a longitudinal study, assessing the impact of both strategies on the representativeness of the final study sample. METHOD: Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to 1) identify characteristics associated with spouse referral, 2) compare response rates based on recruitment strategy and assess whether recruitment strategy modified correlates of response propensity among spouses, and 3) assess whether referred spouse characteristics differed from non-referred spouses in the final sample. The study sample consisted of married US service members with 2–5 years of military service as of October 2011 and their spouses. RESULTS: Service members who referred their spouses to participate in the Millennium Cohort Family Study were more likely to be male, have children, serve in the Army, and have combat deployment experience than those who did not refer their spouse. Nearly two-thirds (n = 5331, 64.9%) of referred spouses participated in the Family Study, compared with less than one-third (n = 3458, 29.5%) of directly contacted spouses. Spouse characteristics also differed significantly between recruitment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results suggest that minimal bias was introduced by using a referral recruitment methodology. Service members appeared to be more likely to refer their spouses if they perceived the research topic as relevant to their spouse, such that male service members with combat deployment experience were more likely to refer female spouses caring for multiple children. Referred spouses were significantly more likely to respond to the Millennium Cohort Family Study survey than those who were directly contacted; however, the overall success rate of using a referral strategy was less than recruiting spouses through direct contact. Differences between referred spouses and spouses contacted directly mirrored service member referring characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6201494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62014942018-10-31 Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias? McMaster, Hope Seib Stander, Valerie A. Williams, Christianna S. Woodall, Kelly A. O’Malley, Christopher A. Bauer, Lauren M. Davila, Evelyn P. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: While enrolling dyads in research studies is not uncommon, there is limited literature on the utility of different recruitment strategies and the resulting selection biases. This paper examined two recruitment strategies used to enroll military couples in a longitudinal study, assessing the impact of both strategies on the representativeness of the final study sample. METHOD: Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to 1) identify characteristics associated with spouse referral, 2) compare response rates based on recruitment strategy and assess whether recruitment strategy modified correlates of response propensity among spouses, and 3) assess whether referred spouse characteristics differed from non-referred spouses in the final sample. The study sample consisted of married US service members with 2–5 years of military service as of October 2011 and their spouses. RESULTS: Service members who referred their spouses to participate in the Millennium Cohort Family Study were more likely to be male, have children, serve in the Army, and have combat deployment experience than those who did not refer their spouse. Nearly two-thirds (n = 5331, 64.9%) of referred spouses participated in the Family Study, compared with less than one-third (n = 3458, 29.5%) of directly contacted spouses. Spouse characteristics also differed significantly between recruitment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results suggest that minimal bias was introduced by using a referral recruitment methodology. Service members appeared to be more likely to refer their spouses if they perceived the research topic as relevant to their spouse, such that male service members with combat deployment experience were more likely to refer female spouses caring for multiple children. Referred spouses were significantly more likely to respond to the Millennium Cohort Family Study survey than those who were directly contacted; however, the overall success rate of using a referral strategy was less than recruiting spouses through direct contact. Differences between referred spouses and spouses contacted directly mirrored service member referring characteristics. BioMed Central 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6201494/ /pubmed/30355317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0575-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McMaster, Hope Seib Stander, Valerie A. Williams, Christianna S. Woodall, Kelly A. O’Malley, Christopher A. Bauer, Lauren M. Davila, Evelyn P. Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias? |
title | Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias? |
title_full | Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias? |
title_fullStr | Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias? |
title_full_unstemmed | Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias? |
title_short | Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias? |
title_sort | engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0575-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcmasterhopeseib engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias AT standervaleriea engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias AT williamschristiannas engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias AT woodallkellya engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias AT omalleychristophera engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias AT bauerlaurenm engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias AT davilaevelynp engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias AT engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias |