Cargando…

Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?

BACKGROUND: While enrolling dyads in research studies is not uncommon, there is limited literature on the utility of different recruitment strategies and the resulting selection biases. This paper examined two recruitment strategies used to enroll military couples in a longitudinal study, assessing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMaster, Hope Seib, Stander, Valerie A., Williams, Christianna S., Woodall, Kelly A., O’Malley, Christopher A., Bauer, Lauren M., Davila, Evelyn P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0575-x
_version_ 1783365513851699200
author McMaster, Hope Seib
Stander, Valerie A.
Williams, Christianna S.
Woodall, Kelly A.
O’Malley, Christopher A.
Bauer, Lauren M.
Davila, Evelyn P.
author_facet McMaster, Hope Seib
Stander, Valerie A.
Williams, Christianna S.
Woodall, Kelly A.
O’Malley, Christopher A.
Bauer, Lauren M.
Davila, Evelyn P.
author_sort McMaster, Hope Seib
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While enrolling dyads in research studies is not uncommon, there is limited literature on the utility of different recruitment strategies and the resulting selection biases. This paper examined two recruitment strategies used to enroll military couples in a longitudinal study, assessing the impact of both strategies on the representativeness of the final study sample. METHOD: Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to 1) identify characteristics associated with spouse referral, 2) compare response rates based on recruitment strategy and assess whether recruitment strategy modified correlates of response propensity among spouses, and 3) assess whether referred spouse characteristics differed from non-referred spouses in the final sample. The study sample consisted of married US service members with 2–5 years of military service as of October 2011 and their spouses. RESULTS: Service members who referred their spouses to participate in the Millennium Cohort Family Study were more likely to be male, have children, serve in the Army, and have combat deployment experience than those who did not refer their spouse. Nearly two-thirds (n = 5331, 64.9%) of referred spouses participated in the Family Study, compared with less than one-third (n = 3458, 29.5%) of directly contacted spouses. Spouse characteristics also differed significantly between recruitment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results suggest that minimal bias was introduced by using a referral recruitment methodology. Service members appeared to be more likely to refer their spouses if they perceived the research topic as relevant to their spouse, such that male service members with combat deployment experience were more likely to refer female spouses caring for multiple children. Referred spouses were significantly more likely to respond to the Millennium Cohort Family Study survey than those who were directly contacted; however, the overall success rate of using a referral strategy was less than recruiting spouses through direct contact. Differences between referred spouses and spouses contacted directly mirrored service member referring characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6201494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62014942018-10-31 Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias? McMaster, Hope Seib Stander, Valerie A. Williams, Christianna S. Woodall, Kelly A. O’Malley, Christopher A. Bauer, Lauren M. Davila, Evelyn P. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: While enrolling dyads in research studies is not uncommon, there is limited literature on the utility of different recruitment strategies and the resulting selection biases. This paper examined two recruitment strategies used to enroll military couples in a longitudinal study, assessing the impact of both strategies on the representativeness of the final study sample. METHOD: Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to 1) identify characteristics associated with spouse referral, 2) compare response rates based on recruitment strategy and assess whether recruitment strategy modified correlates of response propensity among spouses, and 3) assess whether referred spouse characteristics differed from non-referred spouses in the final sample. The study sample consisted of married US service members with 2–5 years of military service as of October 2011 and their spouses. RESULTS: Service members who referred their spouses to participate in the Millennium Cohort Family Study were more likely to be male, have children, serve in the Army, and have combat deployment experience than those who did not refer their spouse. Nearly two-thirds (n = 5331, 64.9%) of referred spouses participated in the Family Study, compared with less than one-third (n = 3458, 29.5%) of directly contacted spouses. Spouse characteristics also differed significantly between recruitment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results suggest that minimal bias was introduced by using a referral recruitment methodology. Service members appeared to be more likely to refer their spouses if they perceived the research topic as relevant to their spouse, such that male service members with combat deployment experience were more likely to refer female spouses caring for multiple children. Referred spouses were significantly more likely to respond to the Millennium Cohort Family Study survey than those who were directly contacted; however, the overall success rate of using a referral strategy was less than recruiting spouses through direct contact. Differences between referred spouses and spouses contacted directly mirrored service member referring characteristics. BioMed Central 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6201494/ /pubmed/30355317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0575-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McMaster, Hope Seib
Stander, Valerie A.
Williams, Christianna S.
Woodall, Kelly A.
O’Malley, Christopher A.
Bauer, Lauren M.
Davila, Evelyn P.
Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?
title Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?
title_full Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?
title_fullStr Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?
title_full_unstemmed Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?
title_short Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?
title_sort engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0575-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmasterhopeseib engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias
AT standervaleriea engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias
AT williamschristiannas engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias
AT woodallkellya engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias
AT omalleychristophera engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias
AT bauerlaurenm engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias
AT davilaevelynp engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias
AT engagingmilitarycouplesinmaritalresearchdoesrequestingreferralsfromservicememberstorecruittheirspousesintroducesamplebias