Cargando…

Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of reading or writing on a smartphone in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine (39) healthy young (age < 40) volunteers. METHODS: The participants were requested to conduct standardiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ha, Ahnul, Kim, Young Kook, Park, Young Joo, Jeoung, Jin Wook, Park, Ki Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206061
_version_ 1783365595619655680
author Ha, Ahnul
Kim, Young Kook
Park, Young Joo
Jeoung, Jin Wook
Park, Ki Ho
author_facet Ha, Ahnul
Kim, Young Kook
Park, Young Joo
Jeoung, Jin Wook
Park, Ki Ho
author_sort Ha, Ahnul
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of reading or writing on a smartphone in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine (39) healthy young (age < 40) volunteers. METHODS: The participants were requested to conduct standardized work (i.e., read a sample text on single mobile device and subsequently type it on the same device) under daylight [300 lux] and low-light [100 lux] conditions independently on consecutive days. On each day, three sets of IOP measurements (total: 7) using a rebound tonometer (iCare PRO; Tiolat, Helsinki, Finland) were performed: (1) pre-work (baseline) [2 measurements], (2) during smartphone work [5, 15, and 25 minutes], and (3) post-work [5 and 15 minutes]. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in IOP at different check-out points. RESULTS: Under the daylight condition, the mean baseline IOP was 13.7 ± 1.8 mmHg, and the mean IOP increased after 5 minutes of work (14.1 ± 1.8 mmHg; +2.0 ± 1.9%; P < 0.001). When the smartphone work lasted for 15 minutes, the IOP showed a further significant increase (15.5 ± 1.7 mmHg; +12.9 ± 4.4%; P < 0.001), which persisted over the course of the 25 minutes of smartphone work (15.3 ± 1.8 mmHg; +11.1 ± 3.9%; P < 0.001); then, after stopping work for 5 minutes, the IOP was restored (13.9 ± 1.7 mmHg; +0.9 ± 2.1%; P = 0.220). Under the low-light condition, the mean IOP was significantly increased immediately after 5 minutes of smartphone work (from 13.9 ± 1.9 to 15.6 ± 1.8 mmHg; +12.1 ± 4.8%; P < 0.001); this IOP increase continued: 17.3 ± 1.9 [+24.7 ± 10.3%] at 15 minutes’ work, and 17.0 ± 1.7 mmHg [+23.1 ± 9.5%] at 25 minutes’ work (P < 0.001 at both check-out points). Five minutes after stopping the smartphone work, interestingly, the IOP significantly dropped, to a level even lower than that of the pre-work (12.8 ± 1.9 mmHg; -8.1 ± 3.0%; P < 0.001), and at post-work 15 minutes, the IOP returned to the baseline (13.9 ± 1.8 mmHg; -0.3 ± 2.6%; P = 0.360). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy young subjects, reading or writing on smartphone significantly increased IOP, and the changes of IOP were faster and greater under the low-light condition. Smartphone users who are concerned about IOP fluctuation are advised to (1) take a break if they read or write on smartphone for more than 5 minutes, and (2) avoid using smartphones wherever possible in dark places.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6201904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62019042018-11-19 Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone Ha, Ahnul Kim, Young Kook Park, Young Joo Jeoung, Jin Wook Park, Ki Ho PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of reading or writing on a smartphone in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine (39) healthy young (age < 40) volunteers. METHODS: The participants were requested to conduct standardized work (i.e., read a sample text on single mobile device and subsequently type it on the same device) under daylight [300 lux] and low-light [100 lux] conditions independently on consecutive days. On each day, three sets of IOP measurements (total: 7) using a rebound tonometer (iCare PRO; Tiolat, Helsinki, Finland) were performed: (1) pre-work (baseline) [2 measurements], (2) during smartphone work [5, 15, and 25 minutes], and (3) post-work [5 and 15 minutes]. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in IOP at different check-out points. RESULTS: Under the daylight condition, the mean baseline IOP was 13.7 ± 1.8 mmHg, and the mean IOP increased after 5 minutes of work (14.1 ± 1.8 mmHg; +2.0 ± 1.9%; P < 0.001). When the smartphone work lasted for 15 minutes, the IOP showed a further significant increase (15.5 ± 1.7 mmHg; +12.9 ± 4.4%; P < 0.001), which persisted over the course of the 25 minutes of smartphone work (15.3 ± 1.8 mmHg; +11.1 ± 3.9%; P < 0.001); then, after stopping work for 5 minutes, the IOP was restored (13.9 ± 1.7 mmHg; +0.9 ± 2.1%; P = 0.220). Under the low-light condition, the mean IOP was significantly increased immediately after 5 minutes of smartphone work (from 13.9 ± 1.9 to 15.6 ± 1.8 mmHg; +12.1 ± 4.8%; P < 0.001); this IOP increase continued: 17.3 ± 1.9 [+24.7 ± 10.3%] at 15 minutes’ work, and 17.0 ± 1.7 mmHg [+23.1 ± 9.5%] at 25 minutes’ work (P < 0.001 at both check-out points). Five minutes after stopping the smartphone work, interestingly, the IOP significantly dropped, to a level even lower than that of the pre-work (12.8 ± 1.9 mmHg; -8.1 ± 3.0%; P < 0.001), and at post-work 15 minutes, the IOP returned to the baseline (13.9 ± 1.8 mmHg; -0.3 ± 2.6%; P = 0.360). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy young subjects, reading or writing on smartphone significantly increased IOP, and the changes of IOP were faster and greater under the low-light condition. Smartphone users who are concerned about IOP fluctuation are advised to (1) take a break if they read or write on smartphone for more than 5 minutes, and (2) avoid using smartphones wherever possible in dark places. Public Library of Science 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6201904/ /pubmed/30359418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206061 Text en © 2018 Ha et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ha, Ahnul
Kim, Young Kook
Park, Young Joo
Jeoung, Jin Wook
Park, Ki Ho
Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone
title Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone
title_full Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone
title_fullStr Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone
title_short Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone
title_sort intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206061
work_keys_str_mv AT haahnul intraocularpressurechangeduringreadingorwritingonsmartphone
AT kimyoungkook intraocularpressurechangeduringreadingorwritingonsmartphone
AT parkyoungjoo intraocularpressurechangeduringreadingorwritingonsmartphone
AT jeoungjinwook intraocularpressurechangeduringreadingorwritingonsmartphone
AT parkkiho intraocularpressurechangeduringreadingorwritingonsmartphone