Cargando…
Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of reading or writing on a smartphone in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine (39) healthy young (age < 40) volunteers. METHODS: The participants were requested to conduct standardiz...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206061 |
_version_ | 1783365595619655680 |
---|---|
author | Ha, Ahnul Kim, Young Kook Park, Young Joo Jeoung, Jin Wook Park, Ki Ho |
author_facet | Ha, Ahnul Kim, Young Kook Park, Young Joo Jeoung, Jin Wook Park, Ki Ho |
author_sort | Ha, Ahnul |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of reading or writing on a smartphone in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine (39) healthy young (age < 40) volunteers. METHODS: The participants were requested to conduct standardized work (i.e., read a sample text on single mobile device and subsequently type it on the same device) under daylight [300 lux] and low-light [100 lux] conditions independently on consecutive days. On each day, three sets of IOP measurements (total: 7) using a rebound tonometer (iCare PRO; Tiolat, Helsinki, Finland) were performed: (1) pre-work (baseline) [2 measurements], (2) during smartphone work [5, 15, and 25 minutes], and (3) post-work [5 and 15 minutes]. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in IOP at different check-out points. RESULTS: Under the daylight condition, the mean baseline IOP was 13.7 ± 1.8 mmHg, and the mean IOP increased after 5 minutes of work (14.1 ± 1.8 mmHg; +2.0 ± 1.9%; P < 0.001). When the smartphone work lasted for 15 minutes, the IOP showed a further significant increase (15.5 ± 1.7 mmHg; +12.9 ± 4.4%; P < 0.001), which persisted over the course of the 25 minutes of smartphone work (15.3 ± 1.8 mmHg; +11.1 ± 3.9%; P < 0.001); then, after stopping work for 5 minutes, the IOP was restored (13.9 ± 1.7 mmHg; +0.9 ± 2.1%; P = 0.220). Under the low-light condition, the mean IOP was significantly increased immediately after 5 minutes of smartphone work (from 13.9 ± 1.9 to 15.6 ± 1.8 mmHg; +12.1 ± 4.8%; P < 0.001); this IOP increase continued: 17.3 ± 1.9 [+24.7 ± 10.3%] at 15 minutes’ work, and 17.0 ± 1.7 mmHg [+23.1 ± 9.5%] at 25 minutes’ work (P < 0.001 at both check-out points). Five minutes after stopping the smartphone work, interestingly, the IOP significantly dropped, to a level even lower than that of the pre-work (12.8 ± 1.9 mmHg; -8.1 ± 3.0%; P < 0.001), and at post-work 15 minutes, the IOP returned to the baseline (13.9 ± 1.8 mmHg; -0.3 ± 2.6%; P = 0.360). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy young subjects, reading or writing on smartphone significantly increased IOP, and the changes of IOP were faster and greater under the low-light condition. Smartphone users who are concerned about IOP fluctuation are advised to (1) take a break if they read or write on smartphone for more than 5 minutes, and (2) avoid using smartphones wherever possible in dark places. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6201904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62019042018-11-19 Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone Ha, Ahnul Kim, Young Kook Park, Young Joo Jeoung, Jin Wook Park, Ki Ho PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of reading or writing on a smartphone in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) changes. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine (39) healthy young (age < 40) volunteers. METHODS: The participants were requested to conduct standardized work (i.e., read a sample text on single mobile device and subsequently type it on the same device) under daylight [300 lux] and low-light [100 lux] conditions independently on consecutive days. On each day, three sets of IOP measurements (total: 7) using a rebound tonometer (iCare PRO; Tiolat, Helsinki, Finland) were performed: (1) pre-work (baseline) [2 measurements], (2) during smartphone work [5, 15, and 25 minutes], and (3) post-work [5 and 15 minutes]. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in IOP at different check-out points. RESULTS: Under the daylight condition, the mean baseline IOP was 13.7 ± 1.8 mmHg, and the mean IOP increased after 5 minutes of work (14.1 ± 1.8 mmHg; +2.0 ± 1.9%; P < 0.001). When the smartphone work lasted for 15 minutes, the IOP showed a further significant increase (15.5 ± 1.7 mmHg; +12.9 ± 4.4%; P < 0.001), which persisted over the course of the 25 minutes of smartphone work (15.3 ± 1.8 mmHg; +11.1 ± 3.9%; P < 0.001); then, after stopping work for 5 minutes, the IOP was restored (13.9 ± 1.7 mmHg; +0.9 ± 2.1%; P = 0.220). Under the low-light condition, the mean IOP was significantly increased immediately after 5 minutes of smartphone work (from 13.9 ± 1.9 to 15.6 ± 1.8 mmHg; +12.1 ± 4.8%; P < 0.001); this IOP increase continued: 17.3 ± 1.9 [+24.7 ± 10.3%] at 15 minutes’ work, and 17.0 ± 1.7 mmHg [+23.1 ± 9.5%] at 25 minutes’ work (P < 0.001 at both check-out points). Five minutes after stopping the smartphone work, interestingly, the IOP significantly dropped, to a level even lower than that of the pre-work (12.8 ± 1.9 mmHg; -8.1 ± 3.0%; P < 0.001), and at post-work 15 minutes, the IOP returned to the baseline (13.9 ± 1.8 mmHg; -0.3 ± 2.6%; P = 0.360). CONCLUSIONS: In healthy young subjects, reading or writing on smartphone significantly increased IOP, and the changes of IOP were faster and greater under the low-light condition. Smartphone users who are concerned about IOP fluctuation are advised to (1) take a break if they read or write on smartphone for more than 5 minutes, and (2) avoid using smartphones wherever possible in dark places. Public Library of Science 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6201904/ /pubmed/30359418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206061 Text en © 2018 Ha et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ha, Ahnul Kim, Young Kook Park, Young Joo Jeoung, Jin Wook Park, Ki Ho Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone |
title | Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone |
title_full | Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone |
title_fullStr | Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone |
title_short | Intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone |
title_sort | intraocular pressure change during reading or writing on smartphone |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haahnul intraocularpressurechangeduringreadingorwritingonsmartphone AT kimyoungkook intraocularpressurechangeduringreadingorwritingonsmartphone AT parkyoungjoo intraocularpressurechangeduringreadingorwritingonsmartphone AT jeoungjinwook intraocularpressurechangeduringreadingorwritingonsmartphone AT parkkiho intraocularpressurechangeduringreadingorwritingonsmartphone |