Cargando…

Modified posterior intravaginal slingplasty: does the additional bilateral tape attachment to the sacrospinous ligament improve the results?

INTRODUCTION: High failure and recurrent prolapse remains an important issue for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. The posterior intravaginal slingplasty (PIVS) is a minimally invasive, transperineal technique providing level I support, by creating neo-sacrouterine ligaments using a mesh. In orde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caliskan, Alpaslan, Ozeren, Mehmet, Goeschen, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386655
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2018.1685
_version_ 1783365717852160000
author Caliskan, Alpaslan
Ozeren, Mehmet
Goeschen, Klaus
author_facet Caliskan, Alpaslan
Ozeren, Mehmet
Goeschen, Klaus
author_sort Caliskan, Alpaslan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: High failure and recurrent prolapse remains an important issue for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. The posterior intravaginal slingplasty (PIVS) is a minimally invasive, transperineal technique providing level I support, by creating neo-sacrouterine ligaments using a mesh. In order to reduce the POP recurrence rate, achieve a safer apical support and thereby better functional outcomes, we attached PIVS tape to the sacrospinous ligament bilaterally and compared the anatomical and functional outcomes for our modified technique versus the original PIVS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 368 patients, with a symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in various grades, who had undergone a total pelvic floor reconstruction. Seventy-seven of 368 (21%) patients underwent the original PIVS, 291 (79%) patients were treated by the modified PIVS. When necessary, the following procedures were added: anterior transobturator mesh, posterior wall repair, perineal body repair and suburethral transobturator sling. All had follow-up checks for at least one year. The primary outcome was an objective cure, defined as grade 0 or grade 1 according to Baden-Walker. Secondary outcomes were prolapse recurrence, symptoms, visual analogue scales for satisfaction, quality of life, recommendation, reoperation rates and presence of complications. RESULTS: The total reconstructions we made, using each technique, were successful. We achieved an apical success rate of 97 to 96%, on average, with the modified and original IVS respectively. We found a statistically significant improvement in urge incontinence and frequency symptoms than the original PIVS with our modified technique. CONCLUSIONS: Modified PIVS in combination with concomitant procedures generates high anatomical and functional cure rates with low complications and recurrences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6202626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62026262018-10-31 Modified posterior intravaginal slingplasty: does the additional bilateral tape attachment to the sacrospinous ligament improve the results? Caliskan, Alpaslan Ozeren, Mehmet Goeschen, Klaus Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: High failure and recurrent prolapse remains an important issue for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. The posterior intravaginal slingplasty (PIVS) is a minimally invasive, transperineal technique providing level I support, by creating neo-sacrouterine ligaments using a mesh. In order to reduce the POP recurrence rate, achieve a safer apical support and thereby better functional outcomes, we attached PIVS tape to the sacrospinous ligament bilaterally and compared the anatomical and functional outcomes for our modified technique versus the original PIVS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 368 patients, with a symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in various grades, who had undergone a total pelvic floor reconstruction. Seventy-seven of 368 (21%) patients underwent the original PIVS, 291 (79%) patients were treated by the modified PIVS. When necessary, the following procedures were added: anterior transobturator mesh, posterior wall repair, perineal body repair and suburethral transobturator sling. All had follow-up checks for at least one year. The primary outcome was an objective cure, defined as grade 0 or grade 1 according to Baden-Walker. Secondary outcomes were prolapse recurrence, symptoms, visual analogue scales for satisfaction, quality of life, recommendation, reoperation rates and presence of complications. RESULTS: The total reconstructions we made, using each technique, were successful. We achieved an apical success rate of 97 to 96%, on average, with the modified and original IVS respectively. We found a statistically significant improvement in urge incontinence and frequency symptoms than the original PIVS with our modified technique. CONCLUSIONS: Modified PIVS in combination with concomitant procedures generates high anatomical and functional cure rates with low complications and recurrences. Polish Urological Association 2018-06-25 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6202626/ /pubmed/30386655 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2018.1685 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Caliskan, Alpaslan
Ozeren, Mehmet
Goeschen, Klaus
Modified posterior intravaginal slingplasty: does the additional bilateral tape attachment to the sacrospinous ligament improve the results?
title Modified posterior intravaginal slingplasty: does the additional bilateral tape attachment to the sacrospinous ligament improve the results?
title_full Modified posterior intravaginal slingplasty: does the additional bilateral tape attachment to the sacrospinous ligament improve the results?
title_fullStr Modified posterior intravaginal slingplasty: does the additional bilateral tape attachment to the sacrospinous ligament improve the results?
title_full_unstemmed Modified posterior intravaginal slingplasty: does the additional bilateral tape attachment to the sacrospinous ligament improve the results?
title_short Modified posterior intravaginal slingplasty: does the additional bilateral tape attachment to the sacrospinous ligament improve the results?
title_sort modified posterior intravaginal slingplasty: does the additional bilateral tape attachment to the sacrospinous ligament improve the results?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386655
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2018.1685
work_keys_str_mv AT caliskanalpaslan modifiedposteriorintravaginalslingplastydoestheadditionalbilateraltapeattachmenttothesacrospinousligamentimprovetheresults
AT ozerenmehmet modifiedposteriorintravaginalslingplastydoestheadditionalbilateraltapeattachmenttothesacrospinousligamentimprovetheresults
AT goeschenklaus modifiedposteriorintravaginalslingplastydoestheadditionalbilateraltapeattachmenttothesacrospinousligamentimprovetheresults