Cargando…

Use of and disparities in access to adaptive devices among U.S. adults with age-related eye diseases()

This paper examines adaptive device use among two samples of U.S. adults aged 40 years and older with age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma or cataracts from the 2008 and 2016 waves of the nationally-representative cross-sectional National Health Interview Survey (n = 2875...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gibson, Diane M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.005
_version_ 1783365726400151552
author Gibson, Diane M.
author_facet Gibson, Diane M.
author_sort Gibson, Diane M.
collection PubMed
description This paper examines adaptive device use among two samples of U.S. adults aged 40 years and older with age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma or cataracts from the 2008 and 2016 waves of the nationally-representative cross-sectional National Health Interview Survey (n = 2875 and n = 6233 respectively). Individuals who replied affirmatively to the question, “do you use any adaptive devices such as telescopic or other prescriptive lenses, magnifiers, large print or talking materials, CCTV, white cane or guide dogs?” were defined as adaptive device users. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models of adaptive device use were estimated. The main regression models used 2008 data and included explanatory variables for vision-related limitations, other functional limitations, sociodemographic characteristics and the local availability of ophthalmologists and optometrists. 6.1% of the 2008 sample and 4.2% of the 2016 sample used adaptive devices, these percentages were significantly different. 31.4% of the 2008 sample and 24.0% of 2016 sample with multiple vision-related limitations used adaptive devices, these percentages were not significantly different. Based on previous research, adaptive device use among the subgroups with multiple vision-related limitations would be expected to improve functional ability. In the regression models, the likelihood of adaptive device use increased significantly with the number of vision-related limitations, family income and local ophthalmologist availability. The regression results provide evidence of socioeconomic and geographic disparities in adaptive device use in the U.S. Together the descriptive statistics and regression results suggest that public health strategies to increase access to adaptive devices are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6202662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62026622018-10-26 Use of and disparities in access to adaptive devices among U.S. adults with age-related eye diseases() Gibson, Diane M. Prev Med Rep Regular Article This paper examines adaptive device use among two samples of U.S. adults aged 40 years and older with age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma or cataracts from the 2008 and 2016 waves of the nationally-representative cross-sectional National Health Interview Survey (n = 2875 and n = 6233 respectively). Individuals who replied affirmatively to the question, “do you use any adaptive devices such as telescopic or other prescriptive lenses, magnifiers, large print or talking materials, CCTV, white cane or guide dogs?” were defined as adaptive device users. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models of adaptive device use were estimated. The main regression models used 2008 data and included explanatory variables for vision-related limitations, other functional limitations, sociodemographic characteristics and the local availability of ophthalmologists and optometrists. 6.1% of the 2008 sample and 4.2% of the 2016 sample used adaptive devices, these percentages were significantly different. 31.4% of the 2008 sample and 24.0% of 2016 sample with multiple vision-related limitations used adaptive devices, these percentages were not significantly different. Based on previous research, adaptive device use among the subgroups with multiple vision-related limitations would be expected to improve functional ability. In the regression models, the likelihood of adaptive device use increased significantly with the number of vision-related limitations, family income and local ophthalmologist availability. The regression results provide evidence of socioeconomic and geographic disparities in adaptive device use in the U.S. Together the descriptive statistics and regression results suggest that public health strategies to increase access to adaptive devices are needed. Elsevier 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6202662/ /pubmed/30370211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.005 Text en © 2018 The Author http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Gibson, Diane M.
Use of and disparities in access to adaptive devices among U.S. adults with age-related eye diseases()
title Use of and disparities in access to adaptive devices among U.S. adults with age-related eye diseases()
title_full Use of and disparities in access to adaptive devices among U.S. adults with age-related eye diseases()
title_fullStr Use of and disparities in access to adaptive devices among U.S. adults with age-related eye diseases()
title_full_unstemmed Use of and disparities in access to adaptive devices among U.S. adults with age-related eye diseases()
title_short Use of and disparities in access to adaptive devices among U.S. adults with age-related eye diseases()
title_sort use of and disparities in access to adaptive devices among u.s. adults with age-related eye diseases()
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.005
work_keys_str_mv AT gibsondianem useofanddisparitiesinaccesstoadaptivedevicesamongusadultswithagerelatedeyediseases