Cargando…

Transferability of biotic interactions: Temporal consistency of arctic plant–rodent relationships is poor

Variability in biotic interaction strength is an integral part of food web functioning. However, the consequences of the spatial and temporal variability of biotic interactions are poorly known, in particular for predicting species abundance and distribution. The amplitude of rodent population cycle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soininen, Eeva M., Henden, John‐Andre, Ravolainen, Virve T., Yoccoz, Nigel G., Bråthen, Kari Anne, Killengreen, Siw T., Ims, Rolf A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4399
_version_ 1783365737904078848
author Soininen, Eeva M.
Henden, John‐Andre
Ravolainen, Virve T.
Yoccoz, Nigel G.
Bråthen, Kari Anne
Killengreen, Siw T.
Ims, Rolf A.
author_facet Soininen, Eeva M.
Henden, John‐Andre
Ravolainen, Virve T.
Yoccoz, Nigel G.
Bråthen, Kari Anne
Killengreen, Siw T.
Ims, Rolf A.
author_sort Soininen, Eeva M.
collection PubMed
description Variability in biotic interaction strength is an integral part of food web functioning. However, the consequences of the spatial and temporal variability of biotic interactions are poorly known, in particular for predicting species abundance and distribution. The amplitude of rodent population cycles (i.e., peak‐phase abundances) has been hypothesized to be determined by vegetation properties in tundra ecosystems. We assessed the spatial and temporal predictability of food and shelter plants effects on peak‐phase small rodent abundance during two consecutive rodent population peaks. Rodent abundance was related to both food and shelter biomass during the first peak, and spatial transferability was mostly good. Yet, the temporal transferability of our models to the next population peak was poorer. Plant–rodent interactions are thus temporally variable and likely more complex than simple one‐directional (bottom‐up) relationships or variably overruled by other biotic interactions and abiotic factors. We propose that parametrizing a more complete set of functional links within food webs across abiotic and biotic contexts would improve transferability of biotic interaction models. Such attempts are currently constrained by the lack of data with replicated estimates of key players in food webs. Enhanced collaboration between researchers whose main research interests lay in different parts of the food web could ameliorate this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6202721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62027212018-11-01 Transferability of biotic interactions: Temporal consistency of arctic plant–rodent relationships is poor Soininen, Eeva M. Henden, John‐Andre Ravolainen, Virve T. Yoccoz, Nigel G. Bråthen, Kari Anne Killengreen, Siw T. Ims, Rolf A. Ecol Evol Original Research Variability in biotic interaction strength is an integral part of food web functioning. However, the consequences of the spatial and temporal variability of biotic interactions are poorly known, in particular for predicting species abundance and distribution. The amplitude of rodent population cycles (i.e., peak‐phase abundances) has been hypothesized to be determined by vegetation properties in tundra ecosystems. We assessed the spatial and temporal predictability of food and shelter plants effects on peak‐phase small rodent abundance during two consecutive rodent population peaks. Rodent abundance was related to both food and shelter biomass during the first peak, and spatial transferability was mostly good. Yet, the temporal transferability of our models to the next population peak was poorer. Plant–rodent interactions are thus temporally variable and likely more complex than simple one‐directional (bottom‐up) relationships or variably overruled by other biotic interactions and abiotic factors. We propose that parametrizing a more complete set of functional links within food webs across abiotic and biotic contexts would improve transferability of biotic interaction models. Such attempts are currently constrained by the lack of data with replicated estimates of key players in food webs. Enhanced collaboration between researchers whose main research interests lay in different parts of the food web could ameliorate this. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6202721/ /pubmed/30386568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4399 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Soininen, Eeva M.
Henden, John‐Andre
Ravolainen, Virve T.
Yoccoz, Nigel G.
Bråthen, Kari Anne
Killengreen, Siw T.
Ims, Rolf A.
Transferability of biotic interactions: Temporal consistency of arctic plant–rodent relationships is poor
title Transferability of biotic interactions: Temporal consistency of arctic plant–rodent relationships is poor
title_full Transferability of biotic interactions: Temporal consistency of arctic plant–rodent relationships is poor
title_fullStr Transferability of biotic interactions: Temporal consistency of arctic plant–rodent relationships is poor
title_full_unstemmed Transferability of biotic interactions: Temporal consistency of arctic plant–rodent relationships is poor
title_short Transferability of biotic interactions: Temporal consistency of arctic plant–rodent relationships is poor
title_sort transferability of biotic interactions: temporal consistency of arctic plant–rodent relationships is poor
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4399
work_keys_str_mv AT soinineneevam transferabilityofbioticinteractionstemporalconsistencyofarcticplantrodentrelationshipsispoor
AT hendenjohnandre transferabilityofbioticinteractionstemporalconsistencyofarcticplantrodentrelationshipsispoor
AT ravolainenvirvet transferabilityofbioticinteractionstemporalconsistencyofarcticplantrodentrelationshipsispoor
AT yoccoznigelg transferabilityofbioticinteractionstemporalconsistencyofarcticplantrodentrelationshipsispoor
AT brathenkarianne transferabilityofbioticinteractionstemporalconsistencyofarcticplantrodentrelationshipsispoor
AT killengreensiwt transferabilityofbioticinteractionstemporalconsistencyofarcticplantrodentrelationshipsispoor
AT imsrolfa transferabilityofbioticinteractionstemporalconsistencyofarcticplantrodentrelationshipsispoor