Cargando…
Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making
BACKGROUND: A relational approach to autonomy refers to the way in which social conditions and relationships shape a person’s self-identity and capacity in decision-making. This article provides an empirical account of how treatment choices for women undergoing breast diseases care are fostered with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8 |
_version_ | 1783365771646205952 |
---|---|
author | Shih, Patti Rapport, Frances Hogden, Anne Bierbaum, Mia Hsu, Jeremy Boyages, John Braithwaite, Jeffrey |
author_facet | Shih, Patti Rapport, Frances Hogden, Anne Bierbaum, Mia Hsu, Jeremy Boyages, John Braithwaite, Jeffrey |
author_sort | Shih, Patti |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A relational approach to autonomy refers to the way in which social conditions and relationships shape a person’s self-identity and capacity in decision-making. This article provides an empirical account of how treatment choices for women undergoing breast diseases care are fostered within the dynamics of their relationships with clinicians, family members, and other aspects of their social environment. METHODS: This qualitative study recruited ten women undergoing treatment at a breast programme, and eight clinicians supporting their care, in a private teaching hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Fourteen patient-clinician consultation observations and 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Schema analysis of interview transcripts were undertaken by a team of researchers and corroborated by observational fieldnotes. RESULTS: Relational identities of patients influenced the rationale for treatment decision-making. Patients drew on supportive resources from family and medical advice from clinicians to progress with treatment goals. While clinicians held much social power over patients as the medical experts, patients highlighted the need for clinicians to earn their trust through demonstrated professionalism. Information exchange created a communicative space for clinicians and patients to negotiate shared values, promoting greater patient ownership of treatment decisions. As treatment progressed, patients’ personal experiences of illness and treatment became a source of self-reflection, with a transformative impact on self-confidence and assertiveness. CONCLUSION: Patients’ confidence and self-trust can be fostered by opportunities for communicative engagement and self-reflection over the course of treatment in breast disease, and better integration of their self-identity and social values in treatment decisions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6202865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62028652018-11-01 Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making Shih, Patti Rapport, Frances Hogden, Anne Bierbaum, Mia Hsu, Jeremy Boyages, John Braithwaite, Jeffrey BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A relational approach to autonomy refers to the way in which social conditions and relationships shape a person’s self-identity and capacity in decision-making. This article provides an empirical account of how treatment choices for women undergoing breast diseases care are fostered within the dynamics of their relationships with clinicians, family members, and other aspects of their social environment. METHODS: This qualitative study recruited ten women undergoing treatment at a breast programme, and eight clinicians supporting their care, in a private teaching hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Fourteen patient-clinician consultation observations and 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Schema analysis of interview transcripts were undertaken by a team of researchers and corroborated by observational fieldnotes. RESULTS: Relational identities of patients influenced the rationale for treatment decision-making. Patients drew on supportive resources from family and medical advice from clinicians to progress with treatment goals. While clinicians held much social power over patients as the medical experts, patients highlighted the need for clinicians to earn their trust through demonstrated professionalism. Information exchange created a communicative space for clinicians and patients to negotiate shared values, promoting greater patient ownership of treatment decisions. As treatment progressed, patients’ personal experiences of illness and treatment became a source of self-reflection, with a transformative impact on self-confidence and assertiveness. CONCLUSION: Patients’ confidence and self-trust can be fostered by opportunities for communicative engagement and self-reflection over the course of treatment in breast disease, and better integration of their self-identity and social values in treatment decisions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6202865/ /pubmed/30359251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shih, Patti Rapport, Frances Hogden, Anne Bierbaum, Mia Hsu, Jeremy Boyages, John Braithwaite, Jeffrey Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making |
title | Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making |
title_full | Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making |
title_fullStr | Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making |
title_full_unstemmed | Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making |
title_short | Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making |
title_sort | relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shihpatti relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking AT rapportfrances relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking AT hogdenanne relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking AT bierbaummia relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking AT hsujeremy relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking AT boyagesjohn relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking AT braithwaitejeffrey relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking |