Cargando…

Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making

BACKGROUND: A relational approach to autonomy refers to the way in which social conditions and relationships shape a person’s self-identity and capacity in decision-making. This article provides an empirical account of how treatment choices for women undergoing breast diseases care are fostered with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shih, Patti, Rapport, Frances, Hogden, Anne, Bierbaum, Mia, Hsu, Jeremy, Boyages, John, Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8
_version_ 1783365771646205952
author Shih, Patti
Rapport, Frances
Hogden, Anne
Bierbaum, Mia
Hsu, Jeremy
Boyages, John
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_facet Shih, Patti
Rapport, Frances
Hogden, Anne
Bierbaum, Mia
Hsu, Jeremy
Boyages, John
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_sort Shih, Patti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A relational approach to autonomy refers to the way in which social conditions and relationships shape a person’s self-identity and capacity in decision-making. This article provides an empirical account of how treatment choices for women undergoing breast diseases care are fostered within the dynamics of their relationships with clinicians, family members, and other aspects of their social environment. METHODS: This qualitative study recruited ten women undergoing treatment at a breast programme, and eight clinicians supporting their care, in a private teaching hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Fourteen patient-clinician consultation observations and 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Schema analysis of interview transcripts were undertaken by a team of researchers and corroborated by observational fieldnotes. RESULTS: Relational identities of patients influenced the rationale for treatment decision-making. Patients drew on supportive resources from family and medical advice from clinicians to progress with treatment goals. While clinicians held much social power over patients as the medical experts, patients highlighted the need for clinicians to earn their trust through demonstrated professionalism. Information exchange created a communicative space for clinicians and patients to negotiate shared values, promoting greater patient ownership of treatment decisions. As treatment progressed, patients’ personal experiences of illness and treatment became a source of self-reflection, with a transformative impact on self-confidence and assertiveness. CONCLUSION: Patients’ confidence and self-trust can be fostered by opportunities for communicative engagement and self-reflection over the course of treatment in breast disease, and better integration of their self-identity and social values in treatment decisions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6202865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62028652018-11-01 Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making Shih, Patti Rapport, Frances Hogden, Anne Bierbaum, Mia Hsu, Jeremy Boyages, John Braithwaite, Jeffrey BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A relational approach to autonomy refers to the way in which social conditions and relationships shape a person’s self-identity and capacity in decision-making. This article provides an empirical account of how treatment choices for women undergoing breast diseases care are fostered within the dynamics of their relationships with clinicians, family members, and other aspects of their social environment. METHODS: This qualitative study recruited ten women undergoing treatment at a breast programme, and eight clinicians supporting their care, in a private teaching hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Fourteen patient-clinician consultation observations and 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Schema analysis of interview transcripts were undertaken by a team of researchers and corroborated by observational fieldnotes. RESULTS: Relational identities of patients influenced the rationale for treatment decision-making. Patients drew on supportive resources from family and medical advice from clinicians to progress with treatment goals. While clinicians held much social power over patients as the medical experts, patients highlighted the need for clinicians to earn their trust through demonstrated professionalism. Information exchange created a communicative space for clinicians and patients to negotiate shared values, promoting greater patient ownership of treatment decisions. As treatment progressed, patients’ personal experiences of illness and treatment became a source of self-reflection, with a transformative impact on self-confidence and assertiveness. CONCLUSION: Patients’ confidence and self-trust can be fostered by opportunities for communicative engagement and self-reflection over the course of treatment in breast disease, and better integration of their self-identity and social values in treatment decisions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6202865/ /pubmed/30359251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shih, Patti
Rapport, Frances
Hogden, Anne
Bierbaum, Mia
Hsu, Jeremy
Boyages, John
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making
title Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making
title_full Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making
title_fullStr Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making
title_full_unstemmed Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making
title_short Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making
title_sort relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients’ capacity for decision-making
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6202865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8
work_keys_str_mv AT shihpatti relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking
AT rapportfrances relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking
AT hogdenanne relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking
AT bierbaummia relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking
AT hsujeremy relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking
AT boyagesjohn relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking
AT braithwaitejeffrey relationalautonomyinbreastdiseasescareaqualitativestudyofcontextualandsocialconditionsofpatientscapacityfordecisionmaking