Cargando…

Improving communication of patient issues on transfer out of intensive care

The written medical handover document is frequently poor in quality and highly variable which raises concerns about patient safety. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients have complex medical and social issues which increases the risk of errors during ongoing hospital treatment. Our project team of four...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Jessica Caroline, Johnston-Walker, Lizzie, Parker, Kim, Townend, Katherine, Bickley, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30397660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000385
_version_ 1783365795518087168
author Roberts, Jessica Caroline
Johnston-Walker, Lizzie
Parker, Kim
Townend, Katherine
Bickley, James
author_facet Roberts, Jessica Caroline
Johnston-Walker, Lizzie
Parker, Kim
Townend, Katherine
Bickley, James
author_sort Roberts, Jessica Caroline
collection PubMed
description The written medical handover document is frequently poor in quality and highly variable which raises concerns about patient safety. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients have complex medical and social issues which increases the risk of errors during ongoing hospital treatment. Our project team of four doctors and two nurses aimed to improve the documentation of patient problems as they leave the ICU. A literature review and process mapping of both medical and nursing transfer documentation helped in understanding the current process. Current problems (CP) were defined as any patient issues which require ongoing thought, management or follow-up. Our progress was tracked using a measure of the number of CPs listed in the free-text field titled ‘Current Problems’ in 50 medical transfer documents. This was graphed on a control chart showing a process in statistical control. Means and control limits were recalculated whenever a process shift occurred. There was no relationship between the number of CPs listed and length of ICU stay, age of patient, or severity of illness on presentation (Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II score). An inter-relationship graph identified the key drivers which were amenable to change: (1) the doctors completing the clinical summary at the time of discharge did not have all the information readily available to them and (2) the doctors were uncertain of the types of problem which should be communicated. Improvements were designed and trialled using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to address these two key drivers. At baseline, the average number of CPs per patient was 1.8. After implementation of a paper problem list at the patient bedside, with supporting education, the average increased to 2.7. This was further improved by the addition of a checklist of common patient problems. This increased the average to 3.85. These improvements were permanently implemented and ongoing audits have shown sustained improvement using statistical process control methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62030082018-11-05 Improving communication of patient issues on transfer out of intensive care Roberts, Jessica Caroline Johnston-Walker, Lizzie Parker, Kim Townend, Katherine Bickley, James BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement report The written medical handover document is frequently poor in quality and highly variable which raises concerns about patient safety. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients have complex medical and social issues which increases the risk of errors during ongoing hospital treatment. Our project team of four doctors and two nurses aimed to improve the documentation of patient problems as they leave the ICU. A literature review and process mapping of both medical and nursing transfer documentation helped in understanding the current process. Current problems (CP) were defined as any patient issues which require ongoing thought, management or follow-up. Our progress was tracked using a measure of the number of CPs listed in the free-text field titled ‘Current Problems’ in 50 medical transfer documents. This was graphed on a control chart showing a process in statistical control. Means and control limits were recalculated whenever a process shift occurred. There was no relationship between the number of CPs listed and length of ICU stay, age of patient, or severity of illness on presentation (Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II score). An inter-relationship graph identified the key drivers which were amenable to change: (1) the doctors completing the clinical summary at the time of discharge did not have all the information readily available to them and (2) the doctors were uncertain of the types of problem which should be communicated. Improvements were designed and trialled using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to address these two key drivers. At baseline, the average number of CPs per patient was 1.8. After implementation of a paper problem list at the patient bedside, with supporting education, the average increased to 2.7. This was further improved by the addition of a checklist of common patient problems. This increased the average to 3.85. These improvements were permanently implemented and ongoing audits have shown sustained improvement using statistical process control methods. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6203008/ /pubmed/30397660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000385 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement report
Roberts, Jessica Caroline
Johnston-Walker, Lizzie
Parker, Kim
Townend, Katherine
Bickley, James
Improving communication of patient issues on transfer out of intensive care
title Improving communication of patient issues on transfer out of intensive care
title_full Improving communication of patient issues on transfer out of intensive care
title_fullStr Improving communication of patient issues on transfer out of intensive care
title_full_unstemmed Improving communication of patient issues on transfer out of intensive care
title_short Improving communication of patient issues on transfer out of intensive care
title_sort improving communication of patient issues on transfer out of intensive care
topic BMJ Quality Improvement report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30397660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000385
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsjessicacaroline improvingcommunicationofpatientissuesontransferoutofintensivecare
AT johnstonwalkerlizzie improvingcommunicationofpatientissuesontransferoutofintensivecare
AT parkerkim improvingcommunicationofpatientissuesontransferoutofintensivecare
AT townendkatherine improvingcommunicationofpatientissuesontransferoutofintensivecare
AT bickleyjames improvingcommunicationofpatientissuesontransferoutofintensivecare