Cargando…

Novel pharmacist-led intervention secures the minimally important difference (MID) in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score: better outcomes for patients and the healthcare provider

INTRODUCTION: A key priority in asthma management is achieving control. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a validated tool showing a numerical indicator which has the potential to provide a target to drive management. A novel pharmacist-led intervention recently evaluated and introduced in the Italia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tinelli, Michela, White, John, Manfrin, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30397484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000322
_version_ 1783365805535133696
author Tinelli, Michela
White, John
Manfrin, Andrea
author_facet Tinelli, Michela
White, John
Manfrin, Andrea
author_sort Tinelli, Michela
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A key priority in asthma management is achieving control. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a validated tool showing a numerical indicator which has the potential to provide a target to drive management. A novel pharmacist-led intervention recently evaluated and introduced in the Italian setting with a cluster randomised controlled trial (C-RCT) showed effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. This paper evaluates whether the intervention is successful in securing the minimally important difference (MID) in the ACT score and provides better health outcomes and economic savings. METHODS: Clinical data were sourced from 816 adult patients with asthma participating in the C-RCT. The success of the intervention was measured looking at the proportion of patients reaching MID in the ACT score. Different levels of asthma control were grouped according to international guidelines and graded using the traffic light rating system. Asthma control levels were linked to economic (National Health Service (NHS) costs) and quality-adjusted life years outcomes using published data. RESULTS: The median ACT score was 19 (partially controlled) at baseline, and 20 and 21 (controlled) at 3-month and 6-month-follow up, respectively (p<0.01). The percentage of patients reaching MID at 3 and 6 months was 15.8% (129) and 19.9% (162), respectively. The overall annual NHS cost savings per 1000 patients attached to the shift towards the MID target were equal to €346 012 at 3 months and increased to €425 483 at 6 months. Health utility gains were equal to 35.42 and 45.12 years in full health gained, respectively. DISCUSSION: The pharmacist-led intervention secured the MID in the ACT score and provided better outcomes for both patients and providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62030662018-11-05 Novel pharmacist-led intervention secures the minimally important difference (MID) in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score: better outcomes for patients and the healthcare provider Tinelli, Michela White, John Manfrin, Andrea BMJ Open Respir Res Asthma INTRODUCTION: A key priority in asthma management is achieving control. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a validated tool showing a numerical indicator which has the potential to provide a target to drive management. A novel pharmacist-led intervention recently evaluated and introduced in the Italian setting with a cluster randomised controlled trial (C-RCT) showed effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. This paper evaluates whether the intervention is successful in securing the minimally important difference (MID) in the ACT score and provides better health outcomes and economic savings. METHODS: Clinical data were sourced from 816 adult patients with asthma participating in the C-RCT. The success of the intervention was measured looking at the proportion of patients reaching MID in the ACT score. Different levels of asthma control were grouped according to international guidelines and graded using the traffic light rating system. Asthma control levels were linked to economic (National Health Service (NHS) costs) and quality-adjusted life years outcomes using published data. RESULTS: The median ACT score was 19 (partially controlled) at baseline, and 20 and 21 (controlled) at 3-month and 6-month-follow up, respectively (p<0.01). The percentage of patients reaching MID at 3 and 6 months was 15.8% (129) and 19.9% (162), respectively. The overall annual NHS cost savings per 1000 patients attached to the shift towards the MID target were equal to €346 012 at 3 months and increased to €425 483 at 6 months. Health utility gains were equal to 35.42 and 45.12 years in full health gained, respectively. DISCUSSION: The pharmacist-led intervention secured the MID in the ACT score and provided better outcomes for both patients and providers. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6203066/ /pubmed/30397484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000322 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Asthma
Tinelli, Michela
White, John
Manfrin, Andrea
Novel pharmacist-led intervention secures the minimally important difference (MID) in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score: better outcomes for patients and the healthcare provider
title Novel pharmacist-led intervention secures the minimally important difference (MID) in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score: better outcomes for patients and the healthcare provider
title_full Novel pharmacist-led intervention secures the minimally important difference (MID) in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score: better outcomes for patients and the healthcare provider
title_fullStr Novel pharmacist-led intervention secures the minimally important difference (MID) in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score: better outcomes for patients and the healthcare provider
title_full_unstemmed Novel pharmacist-led intervention secures the minimally important difference (MID) in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score: better outcomes for patients and the healthcare provider
title_short Novel pharmacist-led intervention secures the minimally important difference (MID) in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score: better outcomes for patients and the healthcare provider
title_sort novel pharmacist-led intervention secures the minimally important difference (mid) in asthma control test (act) score: better outcomes for patients and the healthcare provider
topic Asthma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30397484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000322
work_keys_str_mv AT tinellimichela novelpharmacistledinterventionsecurestheminimallyimportantdifferencemidinasthmacontroltestactscorebetteroutcomesforpatientsandthehealthcareprovider
AT whitejohn novelpharmacistledinterventionsecurestheminimallyimportantdifferencemidinasthmacontroltestactscorebetteroutcomesforpatientsandthehealthcareprovider
AT manfrinandrea novelpharmacistledinterventionsecurestheminimallyimportantdifferencemidinasthmacontroltestactscorebetteroutcomesforpatientsandthehealthcareprovider