Cargando…
Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department
BACKGROUND: Uncrossmatched packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is fundamental in resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock. Ready availability of uncrossmatched blood can be achieved by storing uncrossmatched blood in a blood bank refrigerator in the emergency department (ED), but could theoretically...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30402556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000184 |
_version_ | 1783365817599000576 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Charles T Totten, Michael Davenport, Daniel Ye, Zhan O’Brien, Julie Williams, Dennis Bernard, Andrew Boral, Leonard |
author_facet | Harris, Charles T Totten, Michael Davenport, Daniel Ye, Zhan O’Brien, Julie Williams, Dennis Bernard, Andrew Boral, Leonard |
author_sort | Harris, Charles T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uncrossmatched packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is fundamental in resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock. Ready availability of uncrossmatched blood can be achieved by storing uncrossmatched blood in a blood bank refrigerator in the emergency department (ED), but could theoretically lead to inappropriate uncrossmatched use. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center from January 2013 to March 2014. Possibly inappropriate transfusion was defined as patients who received at least one unit of blood from the ED refrigerator and no more than two units of PRBC in the first 24 hours. Deaths within the first 24 hours were excluded. Patients who received blood from the ED refrigerator who received ≤2 units total in 24 hours were compared with those who received >2 units. RESULTS: 158 adults received blood from the ED refrigerator. 140 (88.6%) were trauma patients. 37 (23.4%) received massive transfusion (MT). 42 (26.6%) deaths were excluded. 29 patients received ≤2 units and 87 received >2 units in the first 24 hours. The ≤2 units group had a higher systolic blood pressure (116 mm Hg vs. 102 mm Hg, p=0.042), lower base deficit (6.4 mEq/L vs. 9.4 mEq/L, p=0.032), higher hematocrit (34% vs. 30%, p=0.024), lower rate of MT protocol activation (27.6% vs. 58.6%, p=0.005), and lower rates of transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (17.2% vs. 54.0%, p=0.001) and platelets (13.8% vs. 39.1%, p=0.012). Appropriately transfused patients were more likely to have evidence of shock with active, non-compressible hemorrhage. Potentially inappropriate uses were more likely in patients either without evidence of hemorrhage or without signs of shock. DISCUSSION: Storing uncrossmatched blood in the ED is an effective way to get PRBCs transfused quickly in hemorrhaging patients and is associated with a low rate of unnecessary uncrossmatched transfusion. Provider education and good clinical judgment are imperative to prevent unnecessary use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6203135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62031352018-11-06 Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department Harris, Charles T Totten, Michael Davenport, Daniel Ye, Zhan O’Brien, Julie Williams, Dennis Bernard, Andrew Boral, Leonard Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Uncrossmatched packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is fundamental in resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock. Ready availability of uncrossmatched blood can be achieved by storing uncrossmatched blood in a blood bank refrigerator in the emergency department (ED), but could theoretically lead to inappropriate uncrossmatched use. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center from January 2013 to March 2014. Possibly inappropriate transfusion was defined as patients who received at least one unit of blood from the ED refrigerator and no more than two units of PRBC in the first 24 hours. Deaths within the first 24 hours were excluded. Patients who received blood from the ED refrigerator who received ≤2 units total in 24 hours were compared with those who received >2 units. RESULTS: 158 adults received blood from the ED refrigerator. 140 (88.6%) were trauma patients. 37 (23.4%) received massive transfusion (MT). 42 (26.6%) deaths were excluded. 29 patients received ≤2 units and 87 received >2 units in the first 24 hours. The ≤2 units group had a higher systolic blood pressure (116 mm Hg vs. 102 mm Hg, p=0.042), lower base deficit (6.4 mEq/L vs. 9.4 mEq/L, p=0.032), higher hematocrit (34% vs. 30%, p=0.024), lower rate of MT protocol activation (27.6% vs. 58.6%, p=0.005), and lower rates of transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (17.2% vs. 54.0%, p=0.001) and platelets (13.8% vs. 39.1%, p=0.012). Appropriately transfused patients were more likely to have evidence of shock with active, non-compressible hemorrhage. Potentially inappropriate uses were more likely in patients either without evidence of hemorrhage or without signs of shock. DISCUSSION: Storing uncrossmatched blood in the ED is an effective way to get PRBCs transfused quickly in hemorrhaging patients and is associated with a low rate of unnecessary uncrossmatched transfusion. Provider education and good clinical judgment are imperative to prevent unnecessary use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6203135/ /pubmed/30402556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000184 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Harris, Charles T Totten, Michael Davenport, Daniel Ye, Zhan O’Brien, Julie Williams, Dennis Bernard, Andrew Boral, Leonard Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department |
title | Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department |
title_full | Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department |
title_fullStr | Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department |
title_short | Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department |
title_sort | experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30402556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrischarlest experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment AT tottenmichael experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment AT davenportdaniel experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment AT yezhan experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment AT obrienjulie experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment AT williamsdennis experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment AT bernardandrew experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment AT boralleonard experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment |