Cargando…

Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department

BACKGROUND: Uncrossmatched packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is fundamental in resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock. Ready availability of uncrossmatched blood can be achieved by storing uncrossmatched blood in a blood bank refrigerator in the emergency department (ED), but could theoretically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Charles T, Totten, Michael, Davenport, Daniel, Ye, Zhan, O’Brien, Julie, Williams, Dennis, Bernard, Andrew, Boral, Leonard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30402556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000184
_version_ 1783365817599000576
author Harris, Charles T
Totten, Michael
Davenport, Daniel
Ye, Zhan
O’Brien, Julie
Williams, Dennis
Bernard, Andrew
Boral, Leonard
author_facet Harris, Charles T
Totten, Michael
Davenport, Daniel
Ye, Zhan
O’Brien, Julie
Williams, Dennis
Bernard, Andrew
Boral, Leonard
author_sort Harris, Charles T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uncrossmatched packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is fundamental in resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock. Ready availability of uncrossmatched blood can be achieved by storing uncrossmatched blood in a blood bank refrigerator in the emergency department (ED), but could theoretically lead to inappropriate uncrossmatched use. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center from January 2013 to March 2014. Possibly inappropriate transfusion was defined as patients who received at least one unit of blood from the ED refrigerator and no more than two units of PRBC in the first 24 hours. Deaths within the first 24 hours were excluded. Patients who received blood from the ED refrigerator who received ≤2 units total in 24 hours were compared with those who received >2 units. RESULTS: 158 adults received blood from the ED refrigerator. 140 (88.6%) were trauma patients. 37 (23.4%) received massive transfusion (MT). 42 (26.6%) deaths were excluded. 29 patients received ≤2 units and 87 received >2 units in the first 24  hours. The ≤2 units group had a higher systolic blood pressure (116  mm Hg vs. 102  mm Hg, p=0.042), lower base deficit (6.4 mEq/L vs. 9.4 mEq/L, p=0.032), higher hematocrit (34% vs. 30%, p=0.024), lower rate of MT protocol activation (27.6% vs. 58.6%, p=0.005), and lower rates of transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (17.2% vs. 54.0%, p=0.001) and platelets (13.8% vs. 39.1%, p=0.012). Appropriately transfused patients were more likely to have evidence of shock with active, non-compressible hemorrhage. Potentially inappropriate uses were more likely in patients either without evidence of hemorrhage or without signs of shock. DISCUSSION: Storing uncrossmatched blood in the ED is an effective way to get PRBCs transfused quickly in hemorrhaging patients and is associated with a low rate of unnecessary uncrossmatched transfusion. Provider education and good clinical judgment are imperative to prevent unnecessary use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62031352018-11-06 Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department Harris, Charles T Totten, Michael Davenport, Daniel Ye, Zhan O’Brien, Julie Williams, Dennis Bernard, Andrew Boral, Leonard Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Uncrossmatched packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is fundamental in resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock. Ready availability of uncrossmatched blood can be achieved by storing uncrossmatched blood in a blood bank refrigerator in the emergency department (ED), but could theoretically lead to inappropriate uncrossmatched use. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center from January 2013 to March 2014. Possibly inappropriate transfusion was defined as patients who received at least one unit of blood from the ED refrigerator and no more than two units of PRBC in the first 24 hours. Deaths within the first 24 hours were excluded. Patients who received blood from the ED refrigerator who received ≤2 units total in 24 hours were compared with those who received >2 units. RESULTS: 158 adults received blood from the ED refrigerator. 140 (88.6%) were trauma patients. 37 (23.4%) received massive transfusion (MT). 42 (26.6%) deaths were excluded. 29 patients received ≤2 units and 87 received >2 units in the first 24  hours. The ≤2 units group had a higher systolic blood pressure (116  mm Hg vs. 102  mm Hg, p=0.042), lower base deficit (6.4 mEq/L vs. 9.4 mEq/L, p=0.032), higher hematocrit (34% vs. 30%, p=0.024), lower rate of MT protocol activation (27.6% vs. 58.6%, p=0.005), and lower rates of transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (17.2% vs. 54.0%, p=0.001) and platelets (13.8% vs. 39.1%, p=0.012). Appropriately transfused patients were more likely to have evidence of shock with active, non-compressible hemorrhage. Potentially inappropriate uses were more likely in patients either without evidence of hemorrhage or without signs of shock. DISCUSSION: Storing uncrossmatched blood in the ED is an effective way to get PRBCs transfused quickly in hemorrhaging patients and is associated with a low rate of unnecessary uncrossmatched transfusion. Provider education and good clinical judgment are imperative to prevent unnecessary use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6203135/ /pubmed/30402556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000184 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Harris, Charles T
Totten, Michael
Davenport, Daniel
Ye, Zhan
O’Brien, Julie
Williams, Dennis
Bernard, Andrew
Boral, Leonard
Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department
title Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department
title_full Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department
title_fullStr Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department
title_short Experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department
title_sort experience with uncrossmatched blood refrigerator in emergency department
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30402556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000184
work_keys_str_mv AT harrischarlest experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment
AT tottenmichael experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment
AT davenportdaniel experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment
AT yezhan experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment
AT obrienjulie experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment
AT williamsdennis experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment
AT bernardandrew experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment
AT boralleonard experiencewithuncrossmatchedbloodrefrigeratorinemergencydepartment