Cargando…

Clinical application of the pedicle in vitro restorer in percutaneous kyphoplasty

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is widely applied for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and has achieved satisfactory clinical results. With the accumulation of clinical cases and prolonged follow-up times, the inability to reconstruct vertebral height...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Yimin, Zeng, Yiwen, Wang, Dalin, Sui, Jisheng, Wang, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0978-8
_version_ 1783365854557110272
author Qi, Yimin
Zeng, Yiwen
Wang, Dalin
Sui, Jisheng
Wang, Qiang
author_facet Qi, Yimin
Zeng, Yiwen
Wang, Dalin
Sui, Jisheng
Wang, Qiang
author_sort Qi, Yimin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is widely applied for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and has achieved satisfactory clinical results. With the accumulation of clinical cases and prolonged follow-up times, the inability to reconstruct vertebral height defects has attracted more and more attention. A comparison of clinical effects was retrospectively reviewed in 72 patients who underwent simple PKP or pedicle in vitro restorer (PIVR) combined with PKP to discuss the clinical application of self-developed PIVR used in PKP. METHODS: From August 2013 to August 2016, 72 patients with OVCFs were treated surgically, with 30 patients undergoing PKP (group A) and 42 undergoing PIVR combined with PKP (group B). Operation-related situations, radiological data, and related scores were compared between the two groups by corresponding statistical methods. RESULTS: Bone cement was successfully injected into 72 vertebral bodies. Sixty-three cases were followed up for an average of 14 months. There were significant differences between the two groups in the improvement of the height of the vertebral body, sagittal Cobb angle, and visual analogue scale (VAS) 1 week after the operation (P < 0.05), and the improvements of group B were better than those in group A. The cement leakage ratio was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at last follow-up was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent vertebral fractures between the two groups at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PIVR combined with PKP can overcome the limitations of PKP alone, that is, hardly restoring vertebral height and height being easily lost again with balloon removal. The combined method can also restore the vertebral fractures to a satisfactory height and effectively maintain the stability of the spine, which improves the long-term quality of life of patients. Thus, PIVR combined with PKP is a better choice for patients with OVCFs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62032892018-11-01 Clinical application of the pedicle in vitro restorer in percutaneous kyphoplasty Qi, Yimin Zeng, Yiwen Wang, Dalin Sui, Jisheng Wang, Qiang J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is widely applied for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and has achieved satisfactory clinical results. With the accumulation of clinical cases and prolonged follow-up times, the inability to reconstruct vertebral height defects has attracted more and more attention. A comparison of clinical effects was retrospectively reviewed in 72 patients who underwent simple PKP or pedicle in vitro restorer (PIVR) combined with PKP to discuss the clinical application of self-developed PIVR used in PKP. METHODS: From August 2013 to August 2016, 72 patients with OVCFs were treated surgically, with 30 patients undergoing PKP (group A) and 42 undergoing PIVR combined with PKP (group B). Operation-related situations, radiological data, and related scores were compared between the two groups by corresponding statistical methods. RESULTS: Bone cement was successfully injected into 72 vertebral bodies. Sixty-three cases were followed up for an average of 14 months. There were significant differences between the two groups in the improvement of the height of the vertebral body, sagittal Cobb angle, and visual analogue scale (VAS) 1 week after the operation (P < 0.05), and the improvements of group B were better than those in group A. The cement leakage ratio was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at last follow-up was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent vertebral fractures between the two groups at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PIVR combined with PKP can overcome the limitations of PKP alone, that is, hardly restoring vertebral height and height being easily lost again with balloon removal. The combined method can also restore the vertebral fractures to a satisfactory height and effectively maintain the stability of the spine, which improves the long-term quality of life of patients. Thus, PIVR combined with PKP is a better choice for patients with OVCFs. BioMed Central 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6203289/ /pubmed/30359276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0978-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qi, Yimin
Zeng, Yiwen
Wang, Dalin
Sui, Jisheng
Wang, Qiang
Clinical application of the pedicle in vitro restorer in percutaneous kyphoplasty
title Clinical application of the pedicle in vitro restorer in percutaneous kyphoplasty
title_full Clinical application of the pedicle in vitro restorer in percutaneous kyphoplasty
title_fullStr Clinical application of the pedicle in vitro restorer in percutaneous kyphoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Clinical application of the pedicle in vitro restorer in percutaneous kyphoplasty
title_short Clinical application of the pedicle in vitro restorer in percutaneous kyphoplasty
title_sort clinical application of the pedicle in vitro restorer in percutaneous kyphoplasty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30359276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0978-8
work_keys_str_mv AT qiyimin clinicalapplicationofthepedicleinvitrorestorerinpercutaneouskyphoplasty
AT zengyiwen clinicalapplicationofthepedicleinvitrorestorerinpercutaneouskyphoplasty
AT wangdalin clinicalapplicationofthepedicleinvitrorestorerinpercutaneouskyphoplasty
AT suijisheng clinicalapplicationofthepedicleinvitrorestorerinpercutaneouskyphoplasty
AT wangqiang clinicalapplicationofthepedicleinvitrorestorerinpercutaneouskyphoplasty