Cargando…

Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: The majority of the five million perinatal deaths worldwide take place in low-resource settings. In contrast to high-resource settings, almost 50% of stillbirths occur intrapartum. The aim of this study was to synthesise available evidence of strategies for foetal surveillance in low-res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Housseine, Natasha, Punt, Marieke C., Browne, Joyce L., Meguid, Tarek, Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin, Kwast, Barbara E., Franx, Arie, Grobbee, Diederick E., Rijken, Marcus J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30365564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206295
_version_ 1783365863039041536
author Housseine, Natasha
Punt, Marieke C.
Browne, Joyce L.
Meguid, Tarek
Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin
Kwast, Barbara E.
Franx, Arie
Grobbee, Diederick E.
Rijken, Marcus J.
author_facet Housseine, Natasha
Punt, Marieke C.
Browne, Joyce L.
Meguid, Tarek
Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin
Kwast, Barbara E.
Franx, Arie
Grobbee, Diederick E.
Rijken, Marcus J.
author_sort Housseine, Natasha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The majority of the five million perinatal deaths worldwide take place in low-resource settings. In contrast to high-resource settings, almost 50% of stillbirths occur intrapartum. The aim of this study was to synthesise available evidence of strategies for foetal surveillance in low-resource settings and associated neonatal and maternal outcomes, including barriers to their implementation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The review was registered with Prospero (CRD42016038679). Five databases were searched up to May 1(st,) 2016 for studies related to intrapartum foetal monitoring strategies and neonatal outcomes in low-resource settings. Two authors extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for each study. The outcomes were narratively synthesised. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis (SWOT) was conducted for each monitoring technique to analyse their implementation. There were 37 studies included: five intervention and 32 observational studies. Use of the partograph improved perinatal outcomes. Intermittent auscultation with Pinard was associated with lowest rates of caesarean sections (10–15%) but with comparable perinatal outcomes to hand-held Doppler and Cardiotocography (CTG). CTG was associated with the highest rates of caesarean sections (28–34%) without proven benefits for perinatal outcome. Several tests on admission (admission tests) and adjunctive tests including foetal stimulation tests improved the accuracy of foetal heart rate monitoring in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: From the available evidence, the partograph is associated with improved perinatal outcomes and is recommended for use with intermittent auscultation for intrapartum monitoring in low resource settings. CTG is associated with higher caesarean section rates without proven benefits for perinatal outcomes, and should not be recommended in low-resource settings. High-quality evidence considering implementation barriers and enablers is needed to determine the optimal foetal monitoring strategy in low-resource settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62033732018-11-19 Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review Housseine, Natasha Punt, Marieke C. Browne, Joyce L. Meguid, Tarek Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin Kwast, Barbara E. Franx, Arie Grobbee, Diederick E. Rijken, Marcus J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The majority of the five million perinatal deaths worldwide take place in low-resource settings. In contrast to high-resource settings, almost 50% of stillbirths occur intrapartum. The aim of this study was to synthesise available evidence of strategies for foetal surveillance in low-resource settings and associated neonatal and maternal outcomes, including barriers to their implementation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The review was registered with Prospero (CRD42016038679). Five databases were searched up to May 1(st,) 2016 for studies related to intrapartum foetal monitoring strategies and neonatal outcomes in low-resource settings. Two authors extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for each study. The outcomes were narratively synthesised. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis (SWOT) was conducted for each monitoring technique to analyse their implementation. There were 37 studies included: five intervention and 32 observational studies. Use of the partograph improved perinatal outcomes. Intermittent auscultation with Pinard was associated with lowest rates of caesarean sections (10–15%) but with comparable perinatal outcomes to hand-held Doppler and Cardiotocography (CTG). CTG was associated with the highest rates of caesarean sections (28–34%) without proven benefits for perinatal outcome. Several tests on admission (admission tests) and adjunctive tests including foetal stimulation tests improved the accuracy of foetal heart rate monitoring in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: From the available evidence, the partograph is associated with improved perinatal outcomes and is recommended for use with intermittent auscultation for intrapartum monitoring in low resource settings. CTG is associated with higher caesarean section rates without proven benefits for perinatal outcomes, and should not be recommended in low-resource settings. High-quality evidence considering implementation barriers and enablers is needed to determine the optimal foetal monitoring strategy in low-resource settings. Public Library of Science 2018-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6203373/ /pubmed/30365564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206295 Text en © 2018 Housseine et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Housseine, Natasha
Punt, Marieke C.
Browne, Joyce L.
Meguid, Tarek
Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin
Kwast, Barbara E.
Franx, Arie
Grobbee, Diederick E.
Rijken, Marcus J.
Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title_full Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title_fullStr Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title_short Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title_sort strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30365564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206295
work_keys_str_mv AT housseinenatasha strategiesforintrapartumfoetalsurveillanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT puntmariekec strategiesforintrapartumfoetalsurveillanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT brownejoycel strategiesforintrapartumfoetalsurveillanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT meguidtarek strategiesforintrapartumfoetalsurveillanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT klipsteingrobuschkerstin strategiesforintrapartumfoetalsurveillanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT kwastbarbarae strategiesforintrapartumfoetalsurveillanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT franxarie strategiesforintrapartumfoetalsurveillanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT grobbeediedericke strategiesforintrapartumfoetalsurveillanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT rijkenmarcusj strategiesforintrapartumfoetalsurveillanceinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview