Cargando…

Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify anatomical indication ranges for different lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes to support surgeons in the preoperative preparation. METHODS: 272 patients who were implanted with a FLEX(20,) FLEX(24), FLEX(28), or a custom-made device (CMD) were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timm, Max Eike, Majdani, Omid, Weller, Tobias, Windeler, Mayra, Lenarz, Thomas, Büchner, Andreas, Salcher, Rolf Benedikt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30365565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206435
_version_ 1783365868520996864
author Timm, Max Eike
Majdani, Omid
Weller, Tobias
Windeler, Mayra
Lenarz, Thomas
Büchner, Andreas
Salcher, Rolf Benedikt
author_facet Timm, Max Eike
Majdani, Omid
Weller, Tobias
Windeler, Mayra
Lenarz, Thomas
Büchner, Andreas
Salcher, Rolf Benedikt
author_sort Timm, Max Eike
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify anatomical indication ranges for different lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes to support surgeons in the preoperative preparation. METHODS: 272 patients who were implanted with a FLEX(20,) FLEX(24), FLEX(28), or a custom-made device (CMD) were included in this study. The cochlear duct length (CDL) and basal cochlear diameter (length A) were measured within preoperative imaging data. The parameter A was then employed to additionally compute CDL estimates using literature approaches. Moreover, the inserted electrode length (IEL) and insertion angle (IA) were measured in postoperative CT data. By combining the preoperative measurements with the IA data, the covered cochlea length (CCL) and relative cochlear coverage (CC) were determined for each cochlea. RESULTS: The measurements of the CDL show comparable results to previous studies. While CDL measurements and estimations cover similar ranges overall, severe deviations occur in individual cases. The electrode specific IEL and CCL are fairly consistent and increase with longer electrodes, but relatively wide ranges of electrode specific CC values were found due to the additional dependence on the respective CDL. Using the correlation of IEL and CCL across electrode arrays, CDL ranges for selected arrays were developed (FLEX(24): 31.3–34.4, FLEX(28): 36.2–40.1, FLEX(Soft): 40.6–44.9). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis shows that electrode specific CC varies due to the CDL variation. Preoperative measurement of the CDL allows for an individualized implant length selection yielding optimized stimulation and a reduced risk of intraoperative trauma. The CDL, as derived from preoperative CT imaging studies, can help the implant surgeon select the appropriate electrode array to maximize the patient’s outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62033942018-11-19 Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges Timm, Max Eike Majdani, Omid Weller, Tobias Windeler, Mayra Lenarz, Thomas Büchner, Andreas Salcher, Rolf Benedikt PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify anatomical indication ranges for different lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes to support surgeons in the preoperative preparation. METHODS: 272 patients who were implanted with a FLEX(20,) FLEX(24), FLEX(28), or a custom-made device (CMD) were included in this study. The cochlear duct length (CDL) and basal cochlear diameter (length A) were measured within preoperative imaging data. The parameter A was then employed to additionally compute CDL estimates using literature approaches. Moreover, the inserted electrode length (IEL) and insertion angle (IA) were measured in postoperative CT data. By combining the preoperative measurements with the IA data, the covered cochlea length (CCL) and relative cochlear coverage (CC) were determined for each cochlea. RESULTS: The measurements of the CDL show comparable results to previous studies. While CDL measurements and estimations cover similar ranges overall, severe deviations occur in individual cases. The electrode specific IEL and CCL are fairly consistent and increase with longer electrodes, but relatively wide ranges of electrode specific CC values were found due to the additional dependence on the respective CDL. Using the correlation of IEL and CCL across electrode arrays, CDL ranges for selected arrays were developed (FLEX(24): 31.3–34.4, FLEX(28): 36.2–40.1, FLEX(Soft): 40.6–44.9). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis shows that electrode specific CC varies due to the CDL variation. Preoperative measurement of the CDL allows for an individualized implant length selection yielding optimized stimulation and a reduced risk of intraoperative trauma. The CDL, as derived from preoperative CT imaging studies, can help the implant surgeon select the appropriate electrode array to maximize the patient’s outcomes. Public Library of Science 2018-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6203394/ /pubmed/30365565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206435 Text en © 2018 Timm et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Timm, Max Eike
Majdani, Omid
Weller, Tobias
Windeler, Mayra
Lenarz, Thomas
Büchner, Andreas
Salcher, Rolf Benedikt
Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges
title Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges
title_full Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges
title_fullStr Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges
title_full_unstemmed Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges
title_short Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges
title_sort patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30365565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206435
work_keys_str_mv AT timmmaxeike patientspecificselectionoflateralwallcochlearimplantelectrodesbasedonanatomicalindicationranges
AT majdaniomid patientspecificselectionoflateralwallcochlearimplantelectrodesbasedonanatomicalindicationranges
AT wellertobias patientspecificselectionoflateralwallcochlearimplantelectrodesbasedonanatomicalindicationranges
AT windelermayra patientspecificselectionoflateralwallcochlearimplantelectrodesbasedonanatomicalindicationranges
AT lenarzthomas patientspecificselectionoflateralwallcochlearimplantelectrodesbasedonanatomicalindicationranges
AT buchnerandreas patientspecificselectionoflateralwallcochlearimplantelectrodesbasedonanatomicalindicationranges
AT salcherrolfbenedikt patientspecificselectionoflateralwallcochlearimplantelectrodesbasedonanatomicalindicationranges