Cargando…
Ongoing, rational calibration of reward-driven perceptual biases
Decision-making is often interpreted in terms of normative computations that maximize a particular reward function for stable, average behaviors. Aberrations from the reward-maximizing solutions, either across subjects or across different sessions for the same subject, are often interpreted as refle...
Autores principales: | Fan, Yunshu, Gold, Joshua I, Ding, Long |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30303484 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36018 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Frontal eye field and caudate neurons make different contributions to reward-biased perceptual decisions
por: Fan, Yunshu, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The caudate nucleus contributes causally to decisions that balance reward and uncertain visual information
por: Doi, Takahiro, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Affective bias as a rational response to the statistics of rewards and punishments
por: Pulcu, Erdem, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Correction: Affective bias as a rational response to the statistics of rewards and punishments
por: Pulcu, Erdem, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Multisensory Perceptual Biases for Social and Reward Associations
por: Stolte, Moritz, et al.
Publicado: (2021)