Cargando…

The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization

The aim of this study was to illuminate risks factors of residual lesions, and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive margin who underwent cervical conization. A retrospective cohort study of 218 patients with positive margin after conization, inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jun-yu, Wang, Zhi-ling, Wang, Zhao-yang, Yang, Xing-sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30313104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012792
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of this study was to illuminate risks factors of residual lesions, and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive margin who underwent cervical conization. A retrospective cohort study of 218 patients with positive margin after conization, including cold knife conization (CKC) and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP), and follow-up from 2013 through 2016. The diagnosis of residual disease and recurrence were established and confirmed by biopsy. We evaluate the correlations among residual rate, recurrence rate, and clinical parameters, such as age, menopausal status, gravity, parity, glandular involvement, thinprep cytologic test (TCT), and human papillomavirus (HPV) results. We also detect the difference between CKC and LEEP. There was statistical difference between the positive margin rate of CKC group and LEEP regarding the surgery methods (5.8% and 12.09% separately, P < .001). Residual disease was found in 53.66% cases where 41 patients received second surgery after conization. Besides, age (P = .027), menopausal status (P = .006), and HPV infection (P = 0.018) were significantly associated with residual lesion. Among 177 cases with histopathologic follow-up, 15.91% women relapsed from 4 to 27 months. As for recurrence we found it was more frequent with HPV infection and glandular involvement (P < .001). TCT was also an independent factor in patients with recurrence of lesion. No evidence shows difference between CKC and LEEP for recurrence rate (P = .918). The factors related to rate of residual lesion were age, menopausal status, and HPV infection. HPV infection, TCT, and glandular involvement were associated with HSIL recurrence. LEEP was as effective as CKC with regard to recurrence rate. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm our findings.