Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels

Many surgeons use quadriceps tendon (QT) graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery; however, despite excellent clinical results, the QT has not achieved universal acceptance for primary ACL reconstruction. One of the reasons for this may be that the QT is technically demanding to h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fink, Christian, Lawton, Robert, Förschner, Felix, Gföller, Peter, Herbort, Mirco, Hoser, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.06.012
_version_ 1783365912785584128
author Fink, Christian
Lawton, Robert
Förschner, Felix
Gföller, Peter
Herbort, Mirco
Hoser, Christian
author_facet Fink, Christian
Lawton, Robert
Förschner, Felix
Gföller, Peter
Herbort, Mirco
Hoser, Christian
author_sort Fink, Christian
collection PubMed
description Many surgeons use quadriceps tendon (QT) graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery; however, despite excellent clinical results, the QT has not achieved universal acceptance for primary ACL reconstruction. One of the reasons for this may be that the QT is technically demanding to harvest and the scar from open harvesting techniques is less cosmetically favorable than that from hamstring tendon techniques. Recent evidence has suggested that broad flat QT grafts may more closely mimic native ACL “ribbon-like” morphology than hamstring tendon grafts. Furthermore, rectangular bone tunnels may more accurately re-create native ACL attachments, allowing grafts to simulate native ACL rotation during knee flexion and potentially improving biomechanics. Rectangular tunnels have further advantages in revision cases, in which—in comparison with round tunnels—they have reduced overlap with pre-existing transtibial tunnels, increasing the chance of bypassing primary tunnels during revision surgery. Finally, instrumentation for minimally invasive QT harvesting has reduced technical difficulty and improved cosmetic results. Hence, technical and cosmetic concerns are no longer barriers to QT use. These anatomic and biomechanical advantages and technical developments make the QT an increasingly attractive option for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62036912018-10-30 Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels Fink, Christian Lawton, Robert Förschner, Felix Gföller, Peter Herbort, Mirco Hoser, Christian Arthrosc Tech Technical Note Many surgeons use quadriceps tendon (QT) graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery; however, despite excellent clinical results, the QT has not achieved universal acceptance for primary ACL reconstruction. One of the reasons for this may be that the QT is technically demanding to harvest and the scar from open harvesting techniques is less cosmetically favorable than that from hamstring tendon techniques. Recent evidence has suggested that broad flat QT grafts may more closely mimic native ACL “ribbon-like” morphology than hamstring tendon grafts. Furthermore, rectangular bone tunnels may more accurately re-create native ACL attachments, allowing grafts to simulate native ACL rotation during knee flexion and potentially improving biomechanics. Rectangular tunnels have further advantages in revision cases, in which—in comparison with round tunnels—they have reduced overlap with pre-existing transtibial tunnels, increasing the chance of bypassing primary tunnels during revision surgery. Finally, instrumentation for minimally invasive QT harvesting has reduced technical difficulty and improved cosmetic results. Hence, technical and cosmetic concerns are no longer barriers to QT use. These anatomic and biomechanical advantages and technical developments make the QT an increasingly attractive option for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction. Elsevier 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6203691/ /pubmed/30377585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.06.012 Text en © 2018 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Technical Note
Fink, Christian
Lawton, Robert
Förschner, Felix
Gföller, Peter
Herbort, Mirco
Hoser, Christian
Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels
title Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels
title_full Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels
title_short Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels
title_sort minimally invasive quadriceps tendon single-bundle, arthroscopic, anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with rectangular bone tunnels
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.06.012
work_keys_str_mv AT finkchristian minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels
AT lawtonrobert minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels
AT forschnerfelix minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels
AT gfollerpeter minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels
AT herbortmirco minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels
AT hoserchristian minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels