Cargando…
Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels
Many surgeons use quadriceps tendon (QT) graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery; however, despite excellent clinical results, the QT has not achieved universal acceptance for primary ACL reconstruction. One of the reasons for this may be that the QT is technically demanding to h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.06.012 |
_version_ | 1783365912785584128 |
---|---|
author | Fink, Christian Lawton, Robert Förschner, Felix Gföller, Peter Herbort, Mirco Hoser, Christian |
author_facet | Fink, Christian Lawton, Robert Förschner, Felix Gföller, Peter Herbort, Mirco Hoser, Christian |
author_sort | Fink, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many surgeons use quadriceps tendon (QT) graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery; however, despite excellent clinical results, the QT has not achieved universal acceptance for primary ACL reconstruction. One of the reasons for this may be that the QT is technically demanding to harvest and the scar from open harvesting techniques is less cosmetically favorable than that from hamstring tendon techniques. Recent evidence has suggested that broad flat QT grafts may more closely mimic native ACL “ribbon-like” morphology than hamstring tendon grafts. Furthermore, rectangular bone tunnels may more accurately re-create native ACL attachments, allowing grafts to simulate native ACL rotation during knee flexion and potentially improving biomechanics. Rectangular tunnels have further advantages in revision cases, in which—in comparison with round tunnels—they have reduced overlap with pre-existing transtibial tunnels, increasing the chance of bypassing primary tunnels during revision surgery. Finally, instrumentation for minimally invasive QT harvesting has reduced technical difficulty and improved cosmetic results. Hence, technical and cosmetic concerns are no longer barriers to QT use. These anatomic and biomechanical advantages and technical developments make the QT an increasingly attractive option for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6203691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62036912018-10-30 Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels Fink, Christian Lawton, Robert Förschner, Felix Gföller, Peter Herbort, Mirco Hoser, Christian Arthrosc Tech Technical Note Many surgeons use quadriceps tendon (QT) graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery; however, despite excellent clinical results, the QT has not achieved universal acceptance for primary ACL reconstruction. One of the reasons for this may be that the QT is technically demanding to harvest and the scar from open harvesting techniques is less cosmetically favorable than that from hamstring tendon techniques. Recent evidence has suggested that broad flat QT grafts may more closely mimic native ACL “ribbon-like” morphology than hamstring tendon grafts. Furthermore, rectangular bone tunnels may more accurately re-create native ACL attachments, allowing grafts to simulate native ACL rotation during knee flexion and potentially improving biomechanics. Rectangular tunnels have further advantages in revision cases, in which—in comparison with round tunnels—they have reduced overlap with pre-existing transtibial tunnels, increasing the chance of bypassing primary tunnels during revision surgery. Finally, instrumentation for minimally invasive QT harvesting has reduced technical difficulty and improved cosmetic results. Hence, technical and cosmetic concerns are no longer barriers to QT use. These anatomic and biomechanical advantages and technical developments make the QT an increasingly attractive option for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction. Elsevier 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6203691/ /pubmed/30377585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.06.012 Text en © 2018 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Fink, Christian Lawton, Robert Förschner, Felix Gföller, Peter Herbort, Mirco Hoser, Christian Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels |
title | Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels |
title_full | Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels |
title_fullStr | Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels |
title_short | Minimally Invasive Quadriceps Tendon Single-Bundle, Arthroscopic, Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Rectangular Bone Tunnels |
title_sort | minimally invasive quadriceps tendon single-bundle, arthroscopic, anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with rectangular bone tunnels |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.06.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finkchristian minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels AT lawtonrobert minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels AT forschnerfelix minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels AT gfollerpeter minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels AT herbortmirco minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels AT hoserchristian minimallyinvasivequadricepstendonsinglebundlearthroscopicanatomicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithrectangularbonetunnels |