Cargando…

An optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft patients

The objective was to present an optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft (OFC) patients, which might be used as an international recommendation for OFC care programs. The present radiological protocol has been structured by the OFC team of the University Hospitals Leuven based on a combined ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Mulder, Dries, Cadenas de Llano‐Pérula, Maria, Willems, Guy, Jacobs, Reinhilde, Dormaar, Jakob Titiaan, Verdonck, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.123
_version_ 1783365941800730624
author De Mulder, Dries
Cadenas de Llano‐Pérula, Maria
Willems, Guy
Jacobs, Reinhilde
Dormaar, Jakob Titiaan
Verdonck, Anna
author_facet De Mulder, Dries
Cadenas de Llano‐Pérula, Maria
Willems, Guy
Jacobs, Reinhilde
Dormaar, Jakob Titiaan
Verdonck, Anna
author_sort De Mulder, Dries
collection PubMed
description The objective was to present an optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft (OFC) patients, which might be used as an international recommendation for OFC care programs. The present radiological protocol has been structured by the OFC team of the University Hospitals Leuven based on a combined approach of clinical experience and scientific evidence. The development was based on careful monitoring of the existing needs for radiological diagnosis by the involved disciplines. Needs were revised by expert consensus and radiological optimization. Effective doses were converted to panoramic equivalents (professional conversion) and background radiation (patient conversion). At the age of 6, a panoramic radiograph is taken for the evaluation of dental anomalies. For the preoperative planning of secondary alveolar bone, grafting a low‐resolution cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) of a limited field of the maxilla is taken at the age of 7 to 9. At the age of 10, 15, and 20, a low‐resolution CBCT of both jaws with the smallest possible field is taken serving as conventional, presurgical, and end of treatment records, respectively. Two‐dimensional images are reconstructed out of 3D ones. There are currently no international guidelines concerning the imaging protocol for OFC patients. It is clear that a multidisciplinary approach plays a key role in radiation hygiene. In this article, we presented an optimized imaging protocol for OFC patients based on European guidelines to accomplish the concepts of justification and optimization, which might be used as an international recommendation for OFC care programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62038232018-11-01 An optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft patients De Mulder, Dries Cadenas de Llano‐Pérula, Maria Willems, Guy Jacobs, Reinhilde Dormaar, Jakob Titiaan Verdonck, Anna Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles The objective was to present an optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft (OFC) patients, which might be used as an international recommendation for OFC care programs. The present radiological protocol has been structured by the OFC team of the University Hospitals Leuven based on a combined approach of clinical experience and scientific evidence. The development was based on careful monitoring of the existing needs for radiological diagnosis by the involved disciplines. Needs were revised by expert consensus and radiological optimization. Effective doses were converted to panoramic equivalents (professional conversion) and background radiation (patient conversion). At the age of 6, a panoramic radiograph is taken for the evaluation of dental anomalies. For the preoperative planning of secondary alveolar bone, grafting a low‐resolution cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) of a limited field of the maxilla is taken at the age of 7 to 9. At the age of 10, 15, and 20, a low‐resolution CBCT of both jaws with the smallest possible field is taken serving as conventional, presurgical, and end of treatment records, respectively. Two‐dimensional images are reconstructed out of 3D ones. There are currently no international guidelines concerning the imaging protocol for OFC patients. It is clear that a multidisciplinary approach plays a key role in radiation hygiene. In this article, we presented an optimized imaging protocol for OFC patients based on European guidelines to accomplish the concepts of justification and optimization, which might be used as an international recommendation for OFC care programs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6203823/ /pubmed/30386636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.123 Text en ©2018 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
De Mulder, Dries
Cadenas de Llano‐Pérula, Maria
Willems, Guy
Jacobs, Reinhilde
Dormaar, Jakob Titiaan
Verdonck, Anna
An optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft patients
title An optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft patients
title_full An optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft patients
title_fullStr An optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft patients
title_full_unstemmed An optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft patients
title_short An optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft patients
title_sort optimized imaging protocol for orofacial cleft patients
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.123
work_keys_str_mv AT demulderdries anoptimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT cadenasdellanoperulamaria anoptimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT willemsguy anoptimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT jacobsreinhilde anoptimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT dormaarjakobtitiaan anoptimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT verdonckanna anoptimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT demulderdries optimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT cadenasdellanoperulamaria optimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT willemsguy optimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT jacobsreinhilde optimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT dormaarjakobtitiaan optimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients
AT verdonckanna optimizedimagingprotocolfororofacialcleftpatients