Cargando…
Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index
Aesthetic appraisal is rarely included in the objective assessment of outcome studies of impacted maxillary canines treatment. The present study aimed to validate a new index for assessing the aesthetic appearance of maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues. The Department of Oral and Maxillofaci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.133 |
_version_ | 1783365942586114048 |
---|---|
author | Grisar, Koenraad Claeys, Gilles Raes, Margot Albdour, Emad Ali Willems, Guy Politis, Constantinus Jacobs, Reinhilde |
author_facet | Grisar, Koenraad Claeys, Gilles Raes, Margot Albdour, Emad Ali Willems, Guy Politis, Constantinus Jacobs, Reinhilde |
author_sort | Grisar, Koenraad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aesthetic appraisal is rarely included in the objective assessment of outcome studies of impacted maxillary canines treatment. The present study aimed to validate a new index for assessing the aesthetic appearance of maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues. The Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at University Hospitals Leuven. Four oral‐maxillofacial surgeons, two orthodontists, two prosthodontists, and two lay persons rated 11 maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues according to the new index. Each of the examiners repeated the examination three times with a 2‐week interval. Twelve relevant aesthetic variables were selected on the basis of the anatomic form, color, and surface characteristics of the canine crown and on the basis of the anatomic form, color, and surface characteristics of the adjacent soft tissues. Intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient and Fleiss' kappa statistics were performed to analyze the intrarater and interrater agreement. The index proofed to be a reliable assessment tool. Considering the cumulative assessment of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index (MCAI), the mean ICC value for the interrater agreement of the 10 examiners was 0.71, representing a good agreement. Intrarater agreement ranged from 0.10 to 0.91. Interrater agreement (Fleiss' kappa statistics) calculated for each variable ranged from 0.08 to 0.98. The MCAI is a tool in rating aesthetic outcome of impacted canine treatment and adjacent soft tissues. The MCAI can be used to evaluate the aesthetic outcome after surgical exposure or transalveolar transplantation of maxillary canines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6203826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62038262018-11-01 Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index Grisar, Koenraad Claeys, Gilles Raes, Margot Albdour, Emad Ali Willems, Guy Politis, Constantinus Jacobs, Reinhilde Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles Aesthetic appraisal is rarely included in the objective assessment of outcome studies of impacted maxillary canines treatment. The present study aimed to validate a new index for assessing the aesthetic appearance of maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues. The Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at University Hospitals Leuven. Four oral‐maxillofacial surgeons, two orthodontists, two prosthodontists, and two lay persons rated 11 maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues according to the new index. Each of the examiners repeated the examination three times with a 2‐week interval. Twelve relevant aesthetic variables were selected on the basis of the anatomic form, color, and surface characteristics of the canine crown and on the basis of the anatomic form, color, and surface characteristics of the adjacent soft tissues. Intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient and Fleiss' kappa statistics were performed to analyze the intrarater and interrater agreement. The index proofed to be a reliable assessment tool. Considering the cumulative assessment of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index (MCAI), the mean ICC value for the interrater agreement of the 10 examiners was 0.71, representing a good agreement. Intrarater agreement ranged from 0.10 to 0.91. Interrater agreement (Fleiss' kappa statistics) calculated for each variable ranged from 0.08 to 0.98. The MCAI is a tool in rating aesthetic outcome of impacted canine treatment and adjacent soft tissues. The MCAI can be used to evaluate the aesthetic outcome after surgical exposure or transalveolar transplantation of maxillary canines. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6203826/ /pubmed/30386643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.133 Text en ©2018 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Grisar, Koenraad Claeys, Gilles Raes, Margot Albdour, Emad Ali Willems, Guy Politis, Constantinus Jacobs, Reinhilde Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index |
title | Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index |
title_full | Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index |
title_short | Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index |
title_sort | development and validation of the maxillary canine aesthetic index |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grisarkoenraad developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex AT claeysgilles developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex AT raesmargot developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex AT albdouremadali developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex AT willemsguy developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex AT politisconstantinus developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex AT jacobsreinhilde developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex |