Cargando…

Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index

Aesthetic appraisal is rarely included in the objective assessment of outcome studies of impacted maxillary canines treatment. The present study aimed to validate a new index for assessing the aesthetic appearance of maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues. The Department of Oral and Maxillofaci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grisar, Koenraad, Claeys, Gilles, Raes, Margot, Albdour, Emad Ali, Willems, Guy, Politis, Constantinus, Jacobs, Reinhilde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.133
_version_ 1783365942586114048
author Grisar, Koenraad
Claeys, Gilles
Raes, Margot
Albdour, Emad Ali
Willems, Guy
Politis, Constantinus
Jacobs, Reinhilde
author_facet Grisar, Koenraad
Claeys, Gilles
Raes, Margot
Albdour, Emad Ali
Willems, Guy
Politis, Constantinus
Jacobs, Reinhilde
author_sort Grisar, Koenraad
collection PubMed
description Aesthetic appraisal is rarely included in the objective assessment of outcome studies of impacted maxillary canines treatment. The present study aimed to validate a new index for assessing the aesthetic appearance of maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues. The Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at University Hospitals Leuven. Four oral‐maxillofacial surgeons, two orthodontists, two prosthodontists, and two lay persons rated 11 maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues according to the new index. Each of the examiners repeated the examination three times with a 2‐week interval. Twelve relevant aesthetic variables were selected on the basis of the anatomic form, color, and surface characteristics of the canine crown and on the basis of the anatomic form, color, and surface characteristics of the adjacent soft tissues. Intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient and Fleiss' kappa statistics were performed to analyze the intrarater and interrater agreement. The index proofed to be a reliable assessment tool. Considering the cumulative assessment of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index (MCAI), the mean ICC value for the interrater agreement of the 10 examiners was 0.71, representing a good agreement. Intrarater agreement ranged from 0.10 to 0.91. Interrater agreement (Fleiss' kappa statistics) calculated for each variable ranged from 0.08 to 0.98. The MCAI is a tool in rating aesthetic outcome of impacted canine treatment and adjacent soft tissues. The MCAI can be used to evaluate the aesthetic outcome after surgical exposure or transalveolar transplantation of maxillary canines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62038262018-11-01 Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index Grisar, Koenraad Claeys, Gilles Raes, Margot Albdour, Emad Ali Willems, Guy Politis, Constantinus Jacobs, Reinhilde Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles Aesthetic appraisal is rarely included in the objective assessment of outcome studies of impacted maxillary canines treatment. The present study aimed to validate a new index for assessing the aesthetic appearance of maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues. The Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at University Hospitals Leuven. Four oral‐maxillofacial surgeons, two orthodontists, two prosthodontists, and two lay persons rated 11 maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues according to the new index. Each of the examiners repeated the examination three times with a 2‐week interval. Twelve relevant aesthetic variables were selected on the basis of the anatomic form, color, and surface characteristics of the canine crown and on the basis of the anatomic form, color, and surface characteristics of the adjacent soft tissues. Intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient and Fleiss' kappa statistics were performed to analyze the intrarater and interrater agreement. The index proofed to be a reliable assessment tool. Considering the cumulative assessment of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index (MCAI), the mean ICC value for the interrater agreement of the 10 examiners was 0.71, representing a good agreement. Intrarater agreement ranged from 0.10 to 0.91. Interrater agreement (Fleiss' kappa statistics) calculated for each variable ranged from 0.08 to 0.98. The MCAI is a tool in rating aesthetic outcome of impacted canine treatment and adjacent soft tissues. The MCAI can be used to evaluate the aesthetic outcome after surgical exposure or transalveolar transplantation of maxillary canines. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6203826/ /pubmed/30386643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.133 Text en ©2018 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Grisar, Koenraad
Claeys, Gilles
Raes, Margot
Albdour, Emad Ali
Willems, Guy
Politis, Constantinus
Jacobs, Reinhilde
Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index
title Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index
title_full Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index
title_fullStr Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index
title_short Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index
title_sort development and validation of the maxillary canine aesthetic index
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.133
work_keys_str_mv AT grisarkoenraad developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex
AT claeysgilles developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex
AT raesmargot developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex
AT albdouremadali developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex
AT willemsguy developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex
AT politisconstantinus developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex
AT jacobsreinhilde developmentandvalidationofthemaxillarycanineaestheticindex