Cargando…

Marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis

BACKGROUND: Implant-supported fixed restorations are considered as the standard treatment for replacement of missing teeth. These can be either screw or cement retained. The success or failure of implant restorations depend upon amount of marginal bone loss (MBL). The present study is to determine t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hameed, Muhammad-Hasan, Khan, Farhan-Raza, Ghafoor, Robia, Azam, Syed-Iqbal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386499
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55194
_version_ 1783365956785930240
author Hameed, Muhammad-Hasan
Khan, Farhan-Raza
Ghafoor, Robia
Azam, Syed-Iqbal
author_facet Hameed, Muhammad-Hasan
Khan, Farhan-Raza
Ghafoor, Robia
Azam, Syed-Iqbal
author_sort Hameed, Muhammad-Hasan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implant-supported fixed restorations are considered as the standard treatment for replacement of missing teeth. These can be either screw or cement retained. The success or failure of implant restorations depend upon amount of marginal bone loss (MBL). The present study is to determine the MBL around cement and screw-retained implant prosthesis and to determine various predictors of the MBL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective charts review was conducted at the dental clinics, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi from February 2017 to June 2017 in which 104 implants restorations were assessed using periapical radiographs. MBL was calculated at baseline and at 12 months and the difference was recorded on a proforma. SPSS version 21.0 was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics was computed. Generalized estimation equation analysis (GEE) was applied to determine the predictors of MBL. Level of significance was kept at ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were 104 implant restorations belonging to 41 patients. Screw retained prosthesis showed significantly greater MBL than cement retained prosthesis (p-value =0 .018) (irrespective of crowns or fixed partial dentures). Other factors that turned out to be significant predictors of MBL were male gender (p-value= <0.01), age >65 yrs. (p-value=0.028) and sites where bone grafting was performed (p-value=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Male patients of age >65 yrs. with sites needing bone grafts who were provided with screw retained prosthesis (irrespective of crown or fixed partial dentures) had significantly greater marginal bone loss around implants. Key words:Dental implants, dental prosthesis, implant supported dental prosthesis, alveolar bone loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62039022018-10-31 Marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis Hameed, Muhammad-Hasan Khan, Farhan-Raza Ghafoor, Robia Azam, Syed-Iqbal J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Implant-supported fixed restorations are considered as the standard treatment for replacement of missing teeth. These can be either screw or cement retained. The success or failure of implant restorations depend upon amount of marginal bone loss (MBL). The present study is to determine the MBL around cement and screw-retained implant prosthesis and to determine various predictors of the MBL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective charts review was conducted at the dental clinics, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi from February 2017 to June 2017 in which 104 implants restorations were assessed using periapical radiographs. MBL was calculated at baseline and at 12 months and the difference was recorded on a proforma. SPSS version 21.0 was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics was computed. Generalized estimation equation analysis (GEE) was applied to determine the predictors of MBL. Level of significance was kept at ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were 104 implant restorations belonging to 41 patients. Screw retained prosthesis showed significantly greater MBL than cement retained prosthesis (p-value =0 .018) (irrespective of crowns or fixed partial dentures). Other factors that turned out to be significant predictors of MBL were male gender (p-value= <0.01), age >65 yrs. (p-value=0.028) and sites where bone grafting was performed (p-value=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Male patients of age >65 yrs. with sites needing bone grafts who were provided with screw retained prosthesis (irrespective of crown or fixed partial dentures) had significantly greater marginal bone loss around implants. Key words:Dental implants, dental prosthesis, implant supported dental prosthesis, alveolar bone loss. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6203902/ /pubmed/30386499 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55194 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hameed, Muhammad-Hasan
Khan, Farhan-Raza
Ghafoor, Robia
Azam, Syed-Iqbal
Marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis
title Marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis
title_full Marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis
title_fullStr Marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis
title_short Marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis
title_sort marginal bone loss around cement and screw-retained fixed implant prosthesis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386499
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.55194
work_keys_str_mv AT hameedmuhammadhasan marginalbonelossaroundcementandscrewretainedfixedimplantprosthesis
AT khanfarhanraza marginalbonelossaroundcementandscrewretainedfixedimplantprosthesis
AT ghafoorrobia marginalbonelossaroundcementandscrewretainedfixedimplantprosthesis
AT azamsyediqbal marginalbonelossaroundcementandscrewretainedfixedimplantprosthesis