Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries

BACKGROUND: To compare global surgical pain under nerve block and mandibular infiltration anesthesia techniques, and to evaluate pain during drilling and the distance to the mandibular canal in posterior mandible implant surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia-Blanco, Matias, Gualtieri, Ariel-Felix, Puia, Sebastian-Ariel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386507
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54330
_version_ 1783365957721260032
author Garcia-Blanco, Matias
Gualtieri, Ariel-Felix
Puia, Sebastian-Ariel
author_facet Garcia-Blanco, Matias
Gualtieri, Ariel-Felix
Puia, Sebastian-Ariel
author_sort Garcia-Blanco, Matias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare global surgical pain under nerve block and mandibular infiltration anesthesia techniques, and to evaluate pain during drilling and the distance to the mandibular canal in posterior mandible implant surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted to compare nerve block (Group A) to mandibular infiltration (Group B) techniques for dental implant placement. Global surgical pain (VAS = visual analogue scale), pain during drilling or implant placement (MPQ = McGill pain questionnaire) and distance to the mandibular canal (Image J) were statically analyzed. Age, gender, anxiety levels, tooth to be replaced, implant size, adjacent teeth and duration of surgery were also analyzed. RESULTS: 172 patients were included and 283 dental implants were analyzed. VAS values were significantly higher in Group B (p<0.05). In Group A, 99% of the surgeries were performed painlessly during drilling and implant placement, but in Group B, 11.6% of implant placements (17 implants) felt pain during these surgical steps. Mean distance to mandibular canal (3.8 mm, range: 0.0 to 7.0) in those 17 implants placed under mandibular infiltration was clinically and statistically similar to the mean distance (3.0 mm, range: 0.0 to 9.0) of 130 implants placed painless (p=0.10). Pain during drilling under mandibular infiltration was significantly associated with the duration of surgery (p<0.05) and to both adjacent teeth being present (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although both techniques are safe and effective for placing implants in the posterior mandible, nerve block provides a more profound analgesia than mandibular infiltration. When placing implants under mandibular infiltration, as getting closer to the canal does not increase the feeling of pain, it is not recommended to use the presence of pain as a preventive resource to avoid inferior alveolar nerve injuries. Key words:Dental implant, mandibular infiltration anesthesia, nerve block, pain, nerve injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6203906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62039062018-10-31 A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries Garcia-Blanco, Matias Gualtieri, Ariel-Felix Puia, Sebastian-Ariel J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: To compare global surgical pain under nerve block and mandibular infiltration anesthesia techniques, and to evaluate pain during drilling and the distance to the mandibular canal in posterior mandible implant surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted to compare nerve block (Group A) to mandibular infiltration (Group B) techniques for dental implant placement. Global surgical pain (VAS = visual analogue scale), pain during drilling or implant placement (MPQ = McGill pain questionnaire) and distance to the mandibular canal (Image J) were statically analyzed. Age, gender, anxiety levels, tooth to be replaced, implant size, adjacent teeth and duration of surgery were also analyzed. RESULTS: 172 patients were included and 283 dental implants were analyzed. VAS values were significantly higher in Group B (p<0.05). In Group A, 99% of the surgeries were performed painlessly during drilling and implant placement, but in Group B, 11.6% of implant placements (17 implants) felt pain during these surgical steps. Mean distance to mandibular canal (3.8 mm, range: 0.0 to 7.0) in those 17 implants placed under mandibular infiltration was clinically and statistically similar to the mean distance (3.0 mm, range: 0.0 to 9.0) of 130 implants placed painless (p=0.10). Pain during drilling under mandibular infiltration was significantly associated with the duration of surgery (p<0.05) and to both adjacent teeth being present (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although both techniques are safe and effective for placing implants in the posterior mandible, nerve block provides a more profound analgesia than mandibular infiltration. When placing implants under mandibular infiltration, as getting closer to the canal does not increase the feeling of pain, it is not recommended to use the presence of pain as a preventive resource to avoid inferior alveolar nerve injuries. Key words:Dental implant, mandibular infiltration anesthesia, nerve block, pain, nerve injury. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6203906/ /pubmed/30386507 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54330 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Garcia-Blanco, Matias
Gualtieri, Ariel-Felix
Puia, Sebastian-Ariel
A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries
title A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries
title_full A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries
title_short A randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing nerve block and mandibular infiltration techniques in posterior mandible implant surgeries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6203906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386507
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54330
work_keys_str_mv AT garciablancomatias arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnerveblockandmandibularinfiltrationtechniquesinposteriormandibleimplantsurgeries
AT gualtieriarielfelix arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnerveblockandmandibularinfiltrationtechniquesinposteriormandibleimplantsurgeries
AT puiasebastianariel arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnerveblockandmandibularinfiltrationtechniquesinposteriormandibleimplantsurgeries
AT garciablancomatias randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnerveblockandmandibularinfiltrationtechniquesinposteriormandibleimplantsurgeries
AT gualtieriarielfelix randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnerveblockandmandibularinfiltrationtechniquesinposteriormandibleimplantsurgeries
AT puiasebastianariel randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingnerveblockandmandibularinfiltrationtechniquesinposteriormandibleimplantsurgeries