Cargando…

Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication‐class of response in complex patients

OBJECTIVE: This study determined the clinical utility of an fMRI classification algorithm predicting medication‐class of response in patients with challenging mood diagnoses. METHODS: Ninety‐nine 16–27‐year‐olds underwent resting state fMRI scans in three groups—BD, MDD and healthy controls. A predi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osuch, E., Gao, S., Wammes, M., Théberge, J., Williamson, P., Neufeld, R. J., Du, Y., Sui, J., Calhoun, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30084192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acps.12945
_version_ 1783365993468264448
author Osuch, E.
Gao, S.
Wammes, M.
Théberge, J.
Williamson, P.
Neufeld, R. J.
Du, Y.
Sui, J.
Calhoun, V.
author_facet Osuch, E.
Gao, S.
Wammes, M.
Théberge, J.
Williamson, P.
Neufeld, R. J.
Du, Y.
Sui, J.
Calhoun, V.
author_sort Osuch, E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study determined the clinical utility of an fMRI classification algorithm predicting medication‐class of response in patients with challenging mood diagnoses. METHODS: Ninety‐nine 16–27‐year‐olds underwent resting state fMRI scans in three groups—BD, MDD and healthy controls. A predictive algorithm was trained and cross‐validated on the known‐diagnosis patients using maximally spatially independent components (ICs), constructing a similarity matrix among subjects, partitioning the matrix in kernel space and optimizing support vector machine classifiers and IC combinations. This classifier was also applied to each of 12 new individual patients with unclear mood disorder diagnoses. RESULTS: Classification within the known‐diagnosis group was approximately 92.4% accurate. The five maximally contributory ICs were identified. Applied to the complicated patients, the algorithm diagnosis was consistent with optimal medication‐class of response to sustained recovery in 11 of 12 cases (i.e., almost 92% accuracy). CONCLUSION: This classification algorithm performed well for the know‐diagnosis but also predicted medication‐class of response in difficult‐to‐diagnose patients. Further research can enhance this approach and extend these findings to be more clinically accessible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62040762018-12-11 Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication‐class of response in complex patients Osuch, E. Gao, S. Wammes, M. Théberge, J. Williamson, P. Neufeld, R. J. Du, Y. Sui, J. Calhoun, V. Acta Psychiatr Scand Original Articles OBJECTIVE: This study determined the clinical utility of an fMRI classification algorithm predicting medication‐class of response in patients with challenging mood diagnoses. METHODS: Ninety‐nine 16–27‐year‐olds underwent resting state fMRI scans in three groups—BD, MDD and healthy controls. A predictive algorithm was trained and cross‐validated on the known‐diagnosis patients using maximally spatially independent components (ICs), constructing a similarity matrix among subjects, partitioning the matrix in kernel space and optimizing support vector machine classifiers and IC combinations. This classifier was also applied to each of 12 new individual patients with unclear mood disorder diagnoses. RESULTS: Classification within the known‐diagnosis group was approximately 92.4% accurate. The five maximally contributory ICs were identified. Applied to the complicated patients, the algorithm diagnosis was consistent with optimal medication‐class of response to sustained recovery in 11 of 12 cases (i.e., almost 92% accuracy). CONCLUSION: This classification algorithm performed well for the know‐diagnosis but also predicted medication‐class of response in difficult‐to‐diagnose patients. Further research can enhance this approach and extend these findings to be more clinically accessible. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-06 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6204076/ /pubmed/30084192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acps.12945 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Osuch, E.
Gao, S.
Wammes, M.
Théberge, J.
Williamson, P.
Neufeld, R. J.
Du, Y.
Sui, J.
Calhoun, V.
Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication‐class of response in complex patients
title Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication‐class of response in complex patients
title_full Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication‐class of response in complex patients
title_fullStr Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication‐class of response in complex patients
title_full_unstemmed Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication‐class of response in complex patients
title_short Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication‐class of response in complex patients
title_sort complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fmri connectivity networks predicted medication‐class of response in complex patients
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30084192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acps.12945
work_keys_str_mv AT osuche complexityinmooddisorderdiagnosisfmriconnectivitynetworkspredictedmedicationclassofresponseincomplexpatients
AT gaos complexityinmooddisorderdiagnosisfmriconnectivitynetworkspredictedmedicationclassofresponseincomplexpatients
AT wammesm complexityinmooddisorderdiagnosisfmriconnectivitynetworkspredictedmedicationclassofresponseincomplexpatients
AT thebergej complexityinmooddisorderdiagnosisfmriconnectivitynetworkspredictedmedicationclassofresponseincomplexpatients
AT williamsonp complexityinmooddisorderdiagnosisfmriconnectivitynetworkspredictedmedicationclassofresponseincomplexpatients
AT neufeldrj complexityinmooddisorderdiagnosisfmriconnectivitynetworkspredictedmedicationclassofresponseincomplexpatients
AT duy complexityinmooddisorderdiagnosisfmriconnectivitynetworkspredictedmedicationclassofresponseincomplexpatients
AT suij complexityinmooddisorderdiagnosisfmriconnectivitynetworkspredictedmedicationclassofresponseincomplexpatients
AT calhounv complexityinmooddisorderdiagnosisfmriconnectivitynetworkspredictedmedicationclassofresponseincomplexpatients