Cargando…

Single versus Double Skin Preparation for Infection Prevention in Proximal Humeral Fracture Surgery

Preoperative skin preparation plays a major role in preventing postoperative infections. This study aims to compare a single skin preparation (povidone iodine) with a double skin preparation (chlorhexidine gluconate followed by povidone iodine). Forty patients affected by proximal humeral fracture w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blonna, Davide, Allizond, Valeria, Bellato, Enrico, Banche, Giuliana, Cuffini, Anna Maria, Castoldi, Filippo, Rossi, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8509527
_version_ 1783365998656618496
author Blonna, Davide
Allizond, Valeria
Bellato, Enrico
Banche, Giuliana
Cuffini, Anna Maria
Castoldi, Filippo
Rossi, Roberto
author_facet Blonna, Davide
Allizond, Valeria
Bellato, Enrico
Banche, Giuliana
Cuffini, Anna Maria
Castoldi, Filippo
Rossi, Roberto
author_sort Blonna, Davide
collection PubMed
description Preoperative skin preparation plays a major role in preventing postoperative infections. This study aims to compare a single skin preparation (povidone iodine) with a double skin preparation (chlorhexidine gluconate followed by povidone iodine). Forty patients affected by proximal humeral fracture were included in the study. The day of surgery the two skin preparation strategies were performed in the same shoulder, divided into two areas, at the level of the deltopectoral approach. Skin swabs were collected from each area and subjected to microbiological analysis. Both skin preparations significantly reduced the positive culture rate. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) dropped from 92.5% to 40% and to 7.5% after the single and double skin preparation (p<0.001), respectively. The positivity rate was reduced from 50% to 17.5% (p=0.002) and from 27.5% to 0% (p= 0.001) for Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively, with no difference between the two preparations. The double skin preparation had a more significant effect on bacterial load against CoNS compared to the single skin preparation (p<0.001 versus p= 0.015). In conclusion, both the approaches reduced S. aureus and P. acnes skin load, whereas the double skin preparation is more effective than the single one against CoNS. In light of our findings, preoperative strategies able to reduce bacterial load could potentially increase the final efficacy of perioperative traditional skin preparations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62041592018-11-07 Single versus Double Skin Preparation for Infection Prevention in Proximal Humeral Fracture Surgery Blonna, Davide Allizond, Valeria Bellato, Enrico Banche, Giuliana Cuffini, Anna Maria Castoldi, Filippo Rossi, Roberto Biomed Res Int Research Article Preoperative skin preparation plays a major role in preventing postoperative infections. This study aims to compare a single skin preparation (povidone iodine) with a double skin preparation (chlorhexidine gluconate followed by povidone iodine). Forty patients affected by proximal humeral fracture were included in the study. The day of surgery the two skin preparation strategies were performed in the same shoulder, divided into two areas, at the level of the deltopectoral approach. Skin swabs were collected from each area and subjected to microbiological analysis. Both skin preparations significantly reduced the positive culture rate. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) dropped from 92.5% to 40% and to 7.5% after the single and double skin preparation (p<0.001), respectively. The positivity rate was reduced from 50% to 17.5% (p=0.002) and from 27.5% to 0% (p= 0.001) for Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively, with no difference between the two preparations. The double skin preparation had a more significant effect on bacterial load against CoNS compared to the single skin preparation (p<0.001 versus p= 0.015). In conclusion, both the approaches reduced S. aureus and P. acnes skin load, whereas the double skin preparation is more effective than the single one against CoNS. In light of our findings, preoperative strategies able to reduce bacterial load could potentially increase the final efficacy of perioperative traditional skin preparations. Hindawi 2018-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6204159/ /pubmed/30406143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8509527 Text en Copyright © 2018 Davide Blonna et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blonna, Davide
Allizond, Valeria
Bellato, Enrico
Banche, Giuliana
Cuffini, Anna Maria
Castoldi, Filippo
Rossi, Roberto
Single versus Double Skin Preparation for Infection Prevention in Proximal Humeral Fracture Surgery
title Single versus Double Skin Preparation for Infection Prevention in Proximal Humeral Fracture Surgery
title_full Single versus Double Skin Preparation for Infection Prevention in Proximal Humeral Fracture Surgery
title_fullStr Single versus Double Skin Preparation for Infection Prevention in Proximal Humeral Fracture Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Single versus Double Skin Preparation for Infection Prevention in Proximal Humeral Fracture Surgery
title_short Single versus Double Skin Preparation for Infection Prevention in Proximal Humeral Fracture Surgery
title_sort single versus double skin preparation for infection prevention in proximal humeral fracture surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8509527
work_keys_str_mv AT blonnadavide singleversusdoubleskinpreparationforinfectionpreventioninproximalhumeralfracturesurgery
AT allizondvaleria singleversusdoubleskinpreparationforinfectionpreventioninproximalhumeralfracturesurgery
AT bellatoenrico singleversusdoubleskinpreparationforinfectionpreventioninproximalhumeralfracturesurgery
AT banchegiuliana singleversusdoubleskinpreparationforinfectionpreventioninproximalhumeralfracturesurgery
AT cuffiniannamaria singleversusdoubleskinpreparationforinfectionpreventioninproximalhumeralfracturesurgery
AT castoldifilippo singleversusdoubleskinpreparationforinfectionpreventioninproximalhumeralfracturesurgery
AT rossiroberto singleversusdoubleskinpreparationforinfectionpreventioninproximalhumeralfracturesurgery