Cargando…
Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
Six years after the launch of Systematic Reviews by Biomed Central, this article is part of the celebration of the journal. It contains personal reflections on the past, present and future of systematic reviews, using examples relevant to the role of systematic reviews in cataloguing and analysing r...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30368251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3 |
| _version_ | 1783366018712731648 |
|---|---|
| author | Clarke, Mike |
| author_facet | Clarke, Mike |
| author_sort | Clarke, Mike |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | Six years after the launch of Systematic Reviews by Biomed Central, this article is part of the celebration of the journal. It contains personal reflections on the past, present and future of systematic reviews, using examples relevant to the role of systematic reviews in cataloguing and analysing research, assessing quality and planning new studies. The focus is on the most common of the various types of systematic review in health and social care, namely those assessing the effects of interventions. |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-6204283 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-62042832018-10-31 Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews Clarke, Mike Syst Rev Commentary Six years after the launch of Systematic Reviews by Biomed Central, this article is part of the celebration of the journal. It contains personal reflections on the past, present and future of systematic reviews, using examples relevant to the role of systematic reviews in cataloguing and analysing research, assessing quality and planning new studies. The focus is on the most common of the various types of systematic review in health and social care, namely those assessing the effects of interventions. BioMed Central 2018-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6204283/ /pubmed/30368251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
| spellingShingle | Commentary Clarke, Mike Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews |
| title | Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews |
| title_full | Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews |
| title_fullStr | Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews |
| title_full_unstemmed | Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews |
| title_short | Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews |
| title_sort | partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews |
| topic | Commentary |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30368251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkemike partiallysystematicthoughtsonthehistoryofsystematicreviews |