Cargando…

A New Method for Diaphragmatic Maximum Relaxation Rate Ultrasonographic Measurement in the Assessment of Patients With Diaphragmatic Dysfunction

Measurements of ultrasound diaphragmatic motion, amplitude, force, and velocity of contraction may provide important and essential information about diaphragmatic fatigue, weakness, or paralysis. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a semi-automated analysis system for measuring the diaphragmatic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IEEE 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2868671
_version_ 1783366020672520192
collection PubMed
description Measurements of ultrasound diaphragmatic motion, amplitude, force, and velocity of contraction may provide important and essential information about diaphragmatic fatigue, weakness, or paralysis. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a semi-automated analysis system for measuring the diaphragmatic motion and estimating the maximum relaxation rate (MRR_SAUS) from ultrasound M-mode images of the diaphragmatic muscle. The system was evaluated on 27 M-mode ultrasound images of the diaphragmatic muscle [20 with no resistance (NRES) and 7 with resistance (RES)]. We computed semi-automated ultrasound MRR measurements on all NRES/RES images, using the proposed system (MRR_SAUS = 3.94 ± 0.91/4.98 ± 1.98 [1/s]), and compared them with the manual measurements made by a clinical expert (MRR_MUS = 2.36 ± 1.19/5.8 ± 2.1 [1/s],) and those made by a reference manual method (MRR_MB = 3.93 ± 0.89/3.73 ± 0.52 [1/sec], performed manually with the Biopac system. MRR_SAUS and MRR_MB measurements were not statistically significantly different for NRES and RES subjects but were significantly different with the MRR-MUS measurements made by the clinical expert. It is anticipated that the proposed system might be used in the future in the clinical practice in the assessment and follow up of patients with diaphragmatic weakness or paralysis. It may thus potentially help to understand post-operative pulmonary dysfunction or weaning failure from mechanical ventilation. Further validation and additional experimentation in a larger sample of images and different patient groups is required for further validating the proposed system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher IEEE
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62043292018-11-07 A New Method for Diaphragmatic Maximum Relaxation Rate Ultrasonographic Measurement in the Assessment of Patients With Diaphragmatic Dysfunction IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Article Measurements of ultrasound diaphragmatic motion, amplitude, force, and velocity of contraction may provide important and essential information about diaphragmatic fatigue, weakness, or paralysis. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a semi-automated analysis system for measuring the diaphragmatic motion and estimating the maximum relaxation rate (MRR_SAUS) from ultrasound M-mode images of the diaphragmatic muscle. The system was evaluated on 27 M-mode ultrasound images of the diaphragmatic muscle [20 with no resistance (NRES) and 7 with resistance (RES)]. We computed semi-automated ultrasound MRR measurements on all NRES/RES images, using the proposed system (MRR_SAUS = 3.94 ± 0.91/4.98 ± 1.98 [1/s]), and compared them with the manual measurements made by a clinical expert (MRR_MUS = 2.36 ± 1.19/5.8 ± 2.1 [1/s],) and those made by a reference manual method (MRR_MB = 3.93 ± 0.89/3.73 ± 0.52 [1/sec], performed manually with the Biopac system. MRR_SAUS and MRR_MB measurements were not statistically significantly different for NRES and RES subjects but were significantly different with the MRR-MUS measurements made by the clinical expert. It is anticipated that the proposed system might be used in the future in the clinical practice in the assessment and follow up of patients with diaphragmatic weakness or paralysis. It may thus potentially help to understand post-operative pulmonary dysfunction or weaning failure from mechanical ventilation. Further validation and additional experimentation in a larger sample of images and different patient groups is required for further validating the proposed system. IEEE 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6204329/ /pubmed/30405977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2868671 Text en 2168-2372 © 2018 IEEE. Translations and content mining are permitted for academic research only. Personal use is also permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
spellingShingle Article
A New Method for Diaphragmatic Maximum Relaxation Rate Ultrasonographic Measurement in the Assessment of Patients With Diaphragmatic Dysfunction
title A New Method for Diaphragmatic Maximum Relaxation Rate Ultrasonographic Measurement in the Assessment of Patients With Diaphragmatic Dysfunction
title_full A New Method for Diaphragmatic Maximum Relaxation Rate Ultrasonographic Measurement in the Assessment of Patients With Diaphragmatic Dysfunction
title_fullStr A New Method for Diaphragmatic Maximum Relaxation Rate Ultrasonographic Measurement in the Assessment of Patients With Diaphragmatic Dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed A New Method for Diaphragmatic Maximum Relaxation Rate Ultrasonographic Measurement in the Assessment of Patients With Diaphragmatic Dysfunction
title_short A New Method for Diaphragmatic Maximum Relaxation Rate Ultrasonographic Measurement in the Assessment of Patients With Diaphragmatic Dysfunction
title_sort new method for diaphragmatic maximum relaxation rate ultrasonographic measurement in the assessment of patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2868671
work_keys_str_mv AT anewmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT anewmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT anewmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT anewmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT anewmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT anewmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT anewmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT anewmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT newmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT newmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT newmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT newmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT newmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT newmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT newmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction
AT newmethodfordiaphragmaticmaximumrelaxationrateultrasonographicmeasurementintheassessmentofpatientswithdiaphragmaticdysfunction