Cargando…

The Influence of a Memory Delay on Spatial Coding in the Superior Colliculus: Is Visual Always Visual and Motor Always Motor?

The memory-delay saccade task is often used to separate visual and motor responses in oculomotor structures such as the superior colliculus (SC), with the assumption that these same responses would sum with a short delay during immediate “reactive” saccades to visual stimuli. However, it is also pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadeh, Morteza, Sajad, Amirsaman, Wang, Hongying, Yan, Xiaogang, Crawford, John Douglas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2018.00074
_version_ 1783366024371896320
author Sadeh, Morteza
Sajad, Amirsaman
Wang, Hongying
Yan, Xiaogang
Crawford, John Douglas
author_facet Sadeh, Morteza
Sajad, Amirsaman
Wang, Hongying
Yan, Xiaogang
Crawford, John Douglas
author_sort Sadeh, Morteza
collection PubMed
description The memory-delay saccade task is often used to separate visual and motor responses in oculomotor structures such as the superior colliculus (SC), with the assumption that these same responses would sum with a short delay during immediate “reactive” saccades to visual stimuli. However, it is also possible that additional signals (suppression, delay) alter visual and/or motor response in the memory delay task. Here, we compared the spatiotemporal properties of visual and motor responses of the same SC neurons recorded during both the reactive and memory-delay tasks in two head-unrestrained monkeys. Comparing tasks, visual (aligned with target onset) and motor (aligned on saccade onset) responses were highly correlated across neurons, but the peak response of visual neurons and peak motor responses (of both visuomotor (VM) and motor neurons) were significantly higher in the reactive task. Receptive field organization was generally similar in both tasks. Spatial coding (along a Target-Gaze (TG) continuum) was also similar, with the exception that pure motor cells showed a stronger tendency to code future gaze location in the memory delay task, suggesting a more complete transformation. These results suggest that the introduction of a trained memory delay alters both the vigor and spatial coding of SC visual and motor responses, likely due to a combination of saccade suppression signals and greater signal noise accumulation during the delay in the memory delay task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62043592018-11-07 The Influence of a Memory Delay on Spatial Coding in the Superior Colliculus: Is Visual Always Visual and Motor Always Motor? Sadeh, Morteza Sajad, Amirsaman Wang, Hongying Yan, Xiaogang Crawford, John Douglas Front Neural Circuits Neuroscience The memory-delay saccade task is often used to separate visual and motor responses in oculomotor structures such as the superior colliculus (SC), with the assumption that these same responses would sum with a short delay during immediate “reactive” saccades to visual stimuli. However, it is also possible that additional signals (suppression, delay) alter visual and/or motor response in the memory delay task. Here, we compared the spatiotemporal properties of visual and motor responses of the same SC neurons recorded during both the reactive and memory-delay tasks in two head-unrestrained monkeys. Comparing tasks, visual (aligned with target onset) and motor (aligned on saccade onset) responses were highly correlated across neurons, but the peak response of visual neurons and peak motor responses (of both visuomotor (VM) and motor neurons) were significantly higher in the reactive task. Receptive field organization was generally similar in both tasks. Spatial coding (along a Target-Gaze (TG) continuum) was also similar, with the exception that pure motor cells showed a stronger tendency to code future gaze location in the memory delay task, suggesting a more complete transformation. These results suggest that the introduction of a trained memory delay alters both the vigor and spatial coding of SC visual and motor responses, likely due to a combination of saccade suppression signals and greater signal noise accumulation during the delay in the memory delay task. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6204359/ /pubmed/30405361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2018.00074 Text en Copyright © 2018 Sadeh, Sajad, Wang, Yan and Crawford. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sadeh, Morteza
Sajad, Amirsaman
Wang, Hongying
Yan, Xiaogang
Crawford, John Douglas
The Influence of a Memory Delay on Spatial Coding in the Superior Colliculus: Is Visual Always Visual and Motor Always Motor?
title The Influence of a Memory Delay on Spatial Coding in the Superior Colliculus: Is Visual Always Visual and Motor Always Motor?
title_full The Influence of a Memory Delay on Spatial Coding in the Superior Colliculus: Is Visual Always Visual and Motor Always Motor?
title_fullStr The Influence of a Memory Delay on Spatial Coding in the Superior Colliculus: Is Visual Always Visual and Motor Always Motor?
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of a Memory Delay on Spatial Coding in the Superior Colliculus: Is Visual Always Visual and Motor Always Motor?
title_short The Influence of a Memory Delay on Spatial Coding in the Superior Colliculus: Is Visual Always Visual and Motor Always Motor?
title_sort influence of a memory delay on spatial coding in the superior colliculus: is visual always visual and motor always motor?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2018.00074
work_keys_str_mv AT sadehmorteza theinfluenceofamemorydelayonspatialcodinginthesuperiorcolliculusisvisualalwaysvisualandmotoralwaysmotor
AT sajadamirsaman theinfluenceofamemorydelayonspatialcodinginthesuperiorcolliculusisvisualalwaysvisualandmotoralwaysmotor
AT wanghongying theinfluenceofamemorydelayonspatialcodinginthesuperiorcolliculusisvisualalwaysvisualandmotoralwaysmotor
AT yanxiaogang theinfluenceofamemorydelayonspatialcodinginthesuperiorcolliculusisvisualalwaysvisualandmotoralwaysmotor
AT crawfordjohndouglas theinfluenceofamemorydelayonspatialcodinginthesuperiorcolliculusisvisualalwaysvisualandmotoralwaysmotor
AT sadehmorteza influenceofamemorydelayonspatialcodinginthesuperiorcolliculusisvisualalwaysvisualandmotoralwaysmotor
AT sajadamirsaman influenceofamemorydelayonspatialcodinginthesuperiorcolliculusisvisualalwaysvisualandmotoralwaysmotor
AT wanghongying influenceofamemorydelayonspatialcodinginthesuperiorcolliculusisvisualalwaysvisualandmotoralwaysmotor
AT yanxiaogang influenceofamemorydelayonspatialcodinginthesuperiorcolliculusisvisualalwaysvisualandmotoralwaysmotor
AT crawfordjohndouglas influenceofamemorydelayonspatialcodinginthesuperiorcolliculusisvisualalwaysvisualandmotoralwaysmotor