Cargando…

Cats Parallel Great Apes and Corvids in Motor Self-Regulation – Not Brain but Material Size Matters

The inhibition of unproductive motor movements is regarded as a fundamental cognitive mechanism. Recently it has been shown that species with large absolute brain size or high numbers of pallial neurons, like great apes and corvids, show the highest performance on a task purportedly measuring this m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bobrowicz, Katarzyna, Osvath, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01995
_version_ 1783366027257577472
author Bobrowicz, Katarzyna
Osvath, Mathias
author_facet Bobrowicz, Katarzyna
Osvath, Mathias
author_sort Bobrowicz, Katarzyna
collection PubMed
description The inhibition of unproductive motor movements is regarded as a fundamental cognitive mechanism. Recently it has been shown that species with large absolute brain size or high numbers of pallial neurons, like great apes and corvids, show the highest performance on a task purportedly measuring this mechanism: the cylinder task. In this task the subject must detour a perpendicularly oriented transparent cylinder to reach a reward through a side opening, instead of directly reaching for it and bumping into the front, which is regarded as an inhibitory failure. Here we test domestic cats, for the first time, and show that they can reach the same levels as great apes and corvids on this task, despite having much smaller brains. We tested subjects with apparatuses that varied in size (cylinder length and diameter) and material (glass or plastic), and found that subjects performed best on the large cylinders. As numbers of successes decreased significantly when the cylinders were smaller, we conducted additionally two experiments to discern which properties (length of the transparent surface, goal distance from the surface, size of the side opening) affects performance. We conclude that sensorimotor requirements, which differ between species, may have large impact on the results in such seemingly simple and apparently comparable tests. However, we also conclude that cats have comparably high levels of motor self-regulation, despite the differences between tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62043712018-11-07 Cats Parallel Great Apes and Corvids in Motor Self-Regulation – Not Brain but Material Size Matters Bobrowicz, Katarzyna Osvath, Mathias Front Psychol Psychology The inhibition of unproductive motor movements is regarded as a fundamental cognitive mechanism. Recently it has been shown that species with large absolute brain size or high numbers of pallial neurons, like great apes and corvids, show the highest performance on a task purportedly measuring this mechanism: the cylinder task. In this task the subject must detour a perpendicularly oriented transparent cylinder to reach a reward through a side opening, instead of directly reaching for it and bumping into the front, which is regarded as an inhibitory failure. Here we test domestic cats, for the first time, and show that they can reach the same levels as great apes and corvids on this task, despite having much smaller brains. We tested subjects with apparatuses that varied in size (cylinder length and diameter) and material (glass or plastic), and found that subjects performed best on the large cylinders. As numbers of successes decreased significantly when the cylinders were smaller, we conducted additionally two experiments to discern which properties (length of the transparent surface, goal distance from the surface, size of the side opening) affects performance. We conclude that sensorimotor requirements, which differ between species, may have large impact on the results in such seemingly simple and apparently comparable tests. However, we also conclude that cats have comparably high levels of motor self-regulation, despite the differences between tests. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6204371/ /pubmed/30405485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01995 Text en Copyright © 2018 Bobrowicz and Osvath. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bobrowicz, Katarzyna
Osvath, Mathias
Cats Parallel Great Apes and Corvids in Motor Self-Regulation – Not Brain but Material Size Matters
title Cats Parallel Great Apes and Corvids in Motor Self-Regulation – Not Brain but Material Size Matters
title_full Cats Parallel Great Apes and Corvids in Motor Self-Regulation – Not Brain but Material Size Matters
title_fullStr Cats Parallel Great Apes and Corvids in Motor Self-Regulation – Not Brain but Material Size Matters
title_full_unstemmed Cats Parallel Great Apes and Corvids in Motor Self-Regulation – Not Brain but Material Size Matters
title_short Cats Parallel Great Apes and Corvids in Motor Self-Regulation – Not Brain but Material Size Matters
title_sort cats parallel great apes and corvids in motor self-regulation – not brain but material size matters
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01995
work_keys_str_mv AT bobrowiczkatarzyna catsparallelgreatapesandcorvidsinmotorselfregulationnotbrainbutmaterialsizematters
AT osvathmathias catsparallelgreatapesandcorvidsinmotorselfregulationnotbrainbutmaterialsizematters