Cargando…

Comparative Genomics and in vitro Infection of Field Clonal Isolates of Brucella melitensis Biovar 3 Did Not Identify Signature of Host Adaptation

Brucella spp. are responsible for brucellosis, a widespread zoonosis causing reproductive disorders in animals. Species-classification within this monophyletic genus is based on bacteriological and biochemical phenotyping. Traditionally, Brucella species are reported to have a preferential, but not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holzapfel, Marion, Girault, Guillaume, Keriel, Anne, Ponsart, Claire, O’Callaghan, David, Mick, Virginie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02505
_version_ 1783366032971268096
author Holzapfel, Marion
Girault, Guillaume
Keriel, Anne
Ponsart, Claire
O’Callaghan, David
Mick, Virginie
author_facet Holzapfel, Marion
Girault, Guillaume
Keriel, Anne
Ponsart, Claire
O’Callaghan, David
Mick, Virginie
author_sort Holzapfel, Marion
collection PubMed
description Brucella spp. are responsible for brucellosis, a widespread zoonosis causing reproductive disorders in animals. Species-classification within this monophyletic genus is based on bacteriological and biochemical phenotyping. Traditionally, Brucella species are reported to have a preferential, but not exclusive mammalian host. However, this concept can be challenged since many Brucella species infect a wide range of animal species. Adaptation to a specific host can be a driver of pathogen variation. It is generally thought that Brucella species have highly stable and conserved genomes, however the degree of genomic variation during natural infection has not been documented. Here, we investigated potential genetic diversity and virulence of Brucella melitensis biovar 3 field isolates obtained from a single outbreak but from different host species (human, bovine, small ruminants). A unique MLVA-16 pattern suggested all isolates were clonal. Comparative genomic analyses showed an almost non-existent genetic diversity among isolates (only one SNP; no architectural rearrangements) and did not highlight any signature specific to host adaptation. Similarly, the strains showed identical capacities to enter and replicate in an in vitro model of macrophage infection. In our study, the absence of genomic variability and similar virulence underline that B. melitensis biovar 3 is a broad-host-range pathogen without the need to adapt to different hosts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62043952018-11-07 Comparative Genomics and in vitro Infection of Field Clonal Isolates of Brucella melitensis Biovar 3 Did Not Identify Signature of Host Adaptation Holzapfel, Marion Girault, Guillaume Keriel, Anne Ponsart, Claire O’Callaghan, David Mick, Virginie Front Microbiol Microbiology Brucella spp. are responsible for brucellosis, a widespread zoonosis causing reproductive disorders in animals. Species-classification within this monophyletic genus is based on bacteriological and biochemical phenotyping. Traditionally, Brucella species are reported to have a preferential, but not exclusive mammalian host. However, this concept can be challenged since many Brucella species infect a wide range of animal species. Adaptation to a specific host can be a driver of pathogen variation. It is generally thought that Brucella species have highly stable and conserved genomes, however the degree of genomic variation during natural infection has not been documented. Here, we investigated potential genetic diversity and virulence of Brucella melitensis biovar 3 field isolates obtained from a single outbreak but from different host species (human, bovine, small ruminants). A unique MLVA-16 pattern suggested all isolates were clonal. Comparative genomic analyses showed an almost non-existent genetic diversity among isolates (only one SNP; no architectural rearrangements) and did not highlight any signature specific to host adaptation. Similarly, the strains showed identical capacities to enter and replicate in an in vitro model of macrophage infection. In our study, the absence of genomic variability and similar virulence underline that B. melitensis biovar 3 is a broad-host-range pathogen without the need to adapt to different hosts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6204395/ /pubmed/30405566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02505 Text en Copyright © 2018 Holzapfel, Girault, Keriel, Ponsart, O’Callaghan and Mick. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Holzapfel, Marion
Girault, Guillaume
Keriel, Anne
Ponsart, Claire
O’Callaghan, David
Mick, Virginie
Comparative Genomics and in vitro Infection of Field Clonal Isolates of Brucella melitensis Biovar 3 Did Not Identify Signature of Host Adaptation
title Comparative Genomics and in vitro Infection of Field Clonal Isolates of Brucella melitensis Biovar 3 Did Not Identify Signature of Host Adaptation
title_full Comparative Genomics and in vitro Infection of Field Clonal Isolates of Brucella melitensis Biovar 3 Did Not Identify Signature of Host Adaptation
title_fullStr Comparative Genomics and in vitro Infection of Field Clonal Isolates of Brucella melitensis Biovar 3 Did Not Identify Signature of Host Adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Genomics and in vitro Infection of Field Clonal Isolates of Brucella melitensis Biovar 3 Did Not Identify Signature of Host Adaptation
title_short Comparative Genomics and in vitro Infection of Field Clonal Isolates of Brucella melitensis Biovar 3 Did Not Identify Signature of Host Adaptation
title_sort comparative genomics and in vitro infection of field clonal isolates of brucella melitensis biovar 3 did not identify signature of host adaptation
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02505
work_keys_str_mv AT holzapfelmarion comparativegenomicsandinvitroinfectionoffieldclonalisolatesofbrucellamelitensisbiovar3didnotidentifysignatureofhostadaptation
AT giraultguillaume comparativegenomicsandinvitroinfectionoffieldclonalisolatesofbrucellamelitensisbiovar3didnotidentifysignatureofhostadaptation
AT kerielanne comparativegenomicsandinvitroinfectionoffieldclonalisolatesofbrucellamelitensisbiovar3didnotidentifysignatureofhostadaptation
AT ponsartclaire comparativegenomicsandinvitroinfectionoffieldclonalisolatesofbrucellamelitensisbiovar3didnotidentifysignatureofhostadaptation
AT ocallaghandavid comparativegenomicsandinvitroinfectionoffieldclonalisolatesofbrucellamelitensisbiovar3didnotidentifysignatureofhostadaptation
AT mickvirginie comparativegenomicsandinvitroinfectionoffieldclonalisolatesofbrucellamelitensisbiovar3didnotidentifysignatureofhostadaptation