Cargando…

Percutaneous intervention for symptomatic central vein stenosis in patients with upper limb arteriovenous dialysis access

Central venous stenosis is an important hindrance to long-term maintenance of arteriovenous access in the upper extremities in dialysis patients. AIM: The present study was done to determine feasibility and clinical success of endovascular approach for the treatment of symptomatic central venous ste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AJ, Ashwal, Razak UK, Abdul, R, Padmakumar, Pai, Umesh, M, Sudhakar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30392508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.01.013
_version_ 1783366043560837120
author AJ, Ashwal
Razak UK, Abdul
R, Padmakumar
Pai, Umesh
M, Sudhakar
author_facet AJ, Ashwal
Razak UK, Abdul
R, Padmakumar
Pai, Umesh
M, Sudhakar
author_sort AJ, Ashwal
collection PubMed
description Central venous stenosis is an important hindrance to long-term maintenance of arteriovenous access in the upper extremities in dialysis patients. AIM: The present study was done to determine feasibility and clinical success of endovascular approach for the treatment of symptomatic central venous stenosis associated with significant ipsilateral limb edema in dialysis patients with vascular access in the upper limb. METHODS: A database of hemodialysis patients who underwent endovascular treatment for central venous stenosis from January 2014 to January 2017 at our institute was retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was variable. RESULTS: The study included ten patients (6 men and 4 women) with a mean age of 45.2 years, who underwent thirteen interventions during a period of 3 years. The technical success rate for endovascular treatment was 100%. One patient underwent primary PTA (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty). Seven patients underwent primary PTA and stenting. Three patients underwent secondary PTA. One among these patients underwent secondary PTA twice along with fistuloplasty. One patient underwent secondary PTA with stenting. No immediate complications were encountered during the procedure. Our study shows a primary patency rate of 67% and 33% at 6 months and 12 months for PTA with stenting. Our study also shows secondary or assisted primary patency of 75% at 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular therapy (PTA) with or without stenting for central venous stenosis is safe, with low rates of technical failure. Multiple additional interventions are the rule and long-term patency rate is not very good.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62044562019-09-01 Percutaneous intervention for symptomatic central vein stenosis in patients with upper limb arteriovenous dialysis access AJ, Ashwal Razak UK, Abdul R, Padmakumar Pai, Umesh M, Sudhakar Indian Heart J Interventional Cardiology Central venous stenosis is an important hindrance to long-term maintenance of arteriovenous access in the upper extremities in dialysis patients. AIM: The present study was done to determine feasibility and clinical success of endovascular approach for the treatment of symptomatic central venous stenosis associated with significant ipsilateral limb edema in dialysis patients with vascular access in the upper limb. METHODS: A database of hemodialysis patients who underwent endovascular treatment for central venous stenosis from January 2014 to January 2017 at our institute was retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was variable. RESULTS: The study included ten patients (6 men and 4 women) with a mean age of 45.2 years, who underwent thirteen interventions during a period of 3 years. The technical success rate for endovascular treatment was 100%. One patient underwent primary PTA (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty). Seven patients underwent primary PTA and stenting. Three patients underwent secondary PTA. One among these patients underwent secondary PTA twice along with fistuloplasty. One patient underwent secondary PTA with stenting. No immediate complications were encountered during the procedure. Our study shows a primary patency rate of 67% and 33% at 6 months and 12 months for PTA with stenting. Our study also shows secondary or assisted primary patency of 75% at 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular therapy (PTA) with or without stenting for central venous stenosis is safe, with low rates of technical failure. Multiple additional interventions are the rule and long-term patency rate is not very good. Elsevier 2018 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6204456/ /pubmed/30392508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.01.013 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cardiological Society of India. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Interventional Cardiology
AJ, Ashwal
Razak UK, Abdul
R, Padmakumar
Pai, Umesh
M, Sudhakar
Percutaneous intervention for symptomatic central vein stenosis in patients with upper limb arteriovenous dialysis access
title Percutaneous intervention for symptomatic central vein stenosis in patients with upper limb arteriovenous dialysis access
title_full Percutaneous intervention for symptomatic central vein stenosis in patients with upper limb arteriovenous dialysis access
title_fullStr Percutaneous intervention for symptomatic central vein stenosis in patients with upper limb arteriovenous dialysis access
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous intervention for symptomatic central vein stenosis in patients with upper limb arteriovenous dialysis access
title_short Percutaneous intervention for symptomatic central vein stenosis in patients with upper limb arteriovenous dialysis access
title_sort percutaneous intervention for symptomatic central vein stenosis in patients with upper limb arteriovenous dialysis access
topic Interventional Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30392508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.01.013
work_keys_str_mv AT ajashwal percutaneousinterventionforsymptomaticcentralveinstenosisinpatientswithupperlimbarteriovenousdialysisaccess
AT razakukabdul percutaneousinterventionforsymptomaticcentralveinstenosisinpatientswithupperlimbarteriovenousdialysisaccess
AT rpadmakumar percutaneousinterventionforsymptomaticcentralveinstenosisinpatientswithupperlimbarteriovenousdialysisaccess
AT paiumesh percutaneousinterventionforsymptomaticcentralveinstenosisinpatientswithupperlimbarteriovenousdialysisaccess
AT msudhakar percutaneousinterventionforsymptomaticcentralveinstenosisinpatientswithupperlimbarteriovenousdialysisaccess