Cargando…

Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research

Empathy has received considerable attention from the field of cognitive and social neuroscience. A significant portion of these studies used the event-related potential (ERP) technique to study the mechanisms of empathy for pain in others in different conditions and clinical populations. These show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Coll, Michel-Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30137502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy072
_version_ 1783366050259140608
author Coll, Michel-Pierre
author_facet Coll, Michel-Pierre
author_sort Coll, Michel-Pierre
collection PubMed
description Empathy has received considerable attention from the field of cognitive and social neuroscience. A significant portion of these studies used the event-related potential (ERP) technique to study the mechanisms of empathy for pain in others in different conditions and clinical populations. These show that specific ERP components measured during the observation of pain in others are modulated by several factors and altered in clinical populations. However, issues present in this literature such as analytical flexibility and lack of type 1 error control raise doubts regarding the validity and reliability of these conclusions. The current study compiled the results and methodological characteristics of 40 studies using ERP to study empathy of pain in others. The results of the meta-analysis suggest that the centro-parietal P3 and late positive potential component are sensitive to the observation of pain in others, while the early N1 and N2 components are not reliably associated with vicarious pain observation. The review of the methodological characteristics shows that the presence of selective reporting, analytical flexibility and lack of type 1 error control compromise the interpretation of these results. The implication of these results for the study of empathy and potential solutions to improve future investigations are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62044842018-10-31 Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research Coll, Michel-Pierre Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Article Empathy has received considerable attention from the field of cognitive and social neuroscience. A significant portion of these studies used the event-related potential (ERP) technique to study the mechanisms of empathy for pain in others in different conditions and clinical populations. These show that specific ERP components measured during the observation of pain in others are modulated by several factors and altered in clinical populations. However, issues present in this literature such as analytical flexibility and lack of type 1 error control raise doubts regarding the validity and reliability of these conclusions. The current study compiled the results and methodological characteristics of 40 studies using ERP to study empathy of pain in others. The results of the meta-analysis suggest that the centro-parietal P3 and late positive potential component are sensitive to the observation of pain in others, while the early N1 and N2 components are not reliably associated with vicarious pain observation. The review of the methodological characteristics shows that the presence of selective reporting, analytical flexibility and lack of type 1 error control compromise the interpretation of these results. The implication of these results for the study of empathy and potential solutions to improve future investigations are discussed. Oxford University Press 2018-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6204484/ /pubmed/30137502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy072 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Coll, Michel-Pierre
Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research
title Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research
title_full Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research
title_short Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research
title_sort meta-analysis of erp investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in erp research
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30137502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy072
work_keys_str_mv AT collmichelpierre metaanalysisoferpinvestigationsofpainempathyunderlinesmethodologicalissuesinerpresearch