Cargando…

Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory

Evidence from dual-task studies suggests that working memory supports the retention and implementation of verbal instructions. One key finding that is not readily accommodated by existing models of working memory is that participants are consistently more accurate at physically performing rather tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J, Gathercole, Susan E, Holmes, Joni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30362404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021817743492
_version_ 1783366075800354816
author Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J
Gathercole, Susan E
Holmes, Joni
author_facet Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J
Gathercole, Susan E
Holmes, Joni
author_sort Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J
collection PubMed
description Evidence from dual-task studies suggests that working memory supports the retention and implementation of verbal instructions. One key finding that is not readily accommodated by existing models of working memory is that participants are consistently more accurate at physically performing rather than verbally repeating a sequence of commands. This action advantage has no obvious source within the multi-component model of working memory and has been proposed to be driven by an as yet undetected limited-capacity store dedicated to the temporary maintenance of spatial, motoric, and temporal features of intended movements. To test this hypothesis, we sought to selectively disrupt the action advantage with concurrent motor suppression. In three dual-task experiments, young adults’ immediate memory for sequences of spoken instructions was assessed by both action-based and spoken recall. In addition to classic interference tasks known to tax the phonological loop and central executive, motor suppression tasks designed to impair the encoding and retention of motoric representations were included. These required participants to produce repetitive sequences of either fine motor gestures (Experiment 1, N = 16) or more basic ones (Experiments 2, N = 16, and 3, N = 16). The benefit of action-based recall was reduced following the production of basic gestures but remained intact under all other interference conditions. These results suggest that the mnemonic advantage of enacted recall depends on a cognitive system dedicated to the temporary maintenance of motoric representations of planned action sequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62046482018-11-21 Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J Gathercole, Susan E Holmes, Joni Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles Evidence from dual-task studies suggests that working memory supports the retention and implementation of verbal instructions. One key finding that is not readily accommodated by existing models of working memory is that participants are consistently more accurate at physically performing rather than verbally repeating a sequence of commands. This action advantage has no obvious source within the multi-component model of working memory and has been proposed to be driven by an as yet undetected limited-capacity store dedicated to the temporary maintenance of spatial, motoric, and temporal features of intended movements. To test this hypothesis, we sought to selectively disrupt the action advantage with concurrent motor suppression. In three dual-task experiments, young adults’ immediate memory for sequences of spoken instructions was assessed by both action-based and spoken recall. In addition to classic interference tasks known to tax the phonological loop and central executive, motor suppression tasks designed to impair the encoding and retention of motoric representations were included. These required participants to produce repetitive sequences of either fine motor gestures (Experiment 1, N = 16) or more basic ones (Experiments 2, N = 16, and 3, N = 16). The benefit of action-based recall was reduced following the production of basic gestures but remained intact under all other interference conditions. These results suggest that the mnemonic advantage of enacted recall depends on a cognitive system dedicated to the temporary maintenance of motoric representations of planned action sequences. SAGE Publications 2018-01-01 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6204648/ /pubmed/30362404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021817743492 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jaroslawska, Agnieszka J
Gathercole, Susan E
Holmes, Joni
Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory
title Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory
title_full Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory
title_fullStr Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory
title_full_unstemmed Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory
title_short Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory
title_sort following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30362404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021817743492
work_keys_str_mv AT jaroslawskaagnieszkaj followinginstructionsinadualtaskparadigmevidenceforatemporarymotorstoreinworkingmemory
AT gathercolesusane followinginstructionsinadualtaskparadigmevidenceforatemporarymotorstoreinworkingmemory
AT holmesjoni followinginstructionsinadualtaskparadigmevidenceforatemporarymotorstoreinworkingmemory