Cargando…

An Adaptive Seismocardiography (SCG)-ECG Multimodal Framework for Cardiac Gating Using Artificial Neural Networks

To more accurately trigger data acquisition and reduce radiation exposure of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), a multimodal framework utilizing both electrocardiography (ECG) and seismocardiography (SCG) for CCTA prospective gating is presented. Relying upon a three-layer artificial n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IEEE 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2869141
_version_ 1783366110900387840
collection PubMed
description To more accurately trigger data acquisition and reduce radiation exposure of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), a multimodal framework utilizing both electrocardiography (ECG) and seismocardiography (SCG) for CCTA prospective gating is presented. Relying upon a three-layer artificial neural network that adaptively fuses individual ECG- and SCG-based quiescence predictions on a beat-by-beat basis, this framework yields a personalized quiescence prediction for each cardiac cycle. This framework was tested on seven healthy subjects (age: 22-48; m/f: 4/3) and eleven cardiac patients (age: 31-78; m/f: 6/5). Seventeen out of 18 benefited from the fusion-based prediction as compared to the ECG-only-based prediction, the traditional prospective gating method. Only one patient whose SCG was compromised by noise was more suitable for ECG-only-based prediction. On average, our fused ECG-SCG-based method improves cardiac quiescence prediction by 47% over ECG-only-based method; with both compared against the gold standard, B-mode echocardiography. Fusion-based prediction is also more resistant to heart rate variability than ECG-only- or SCG-only-based prediction. To assess the clinical value, the diagnostic quality of the CCTA reconstructed volumes from the quiescence derived from ECG-, SCG- and fusion-based predictions were graded by a board-certified radiologist using a Likert response format. Grading results indicated the fusion-based prediction improved diagnostic quality. ECG may be a sub-optimal modality for quiescence prediction and can be enhanced by the multimodal framework. The combination of ECG and SCG signals for quiescence prediction bears promise for a more personalized and reliable approach than ECG-only-based method to predict cardiac quiescence for prospective CCTA gating.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher IEEE
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62049242018-11-07 An Adaptive Seismocardiography (SCG)-ECG Multimodal Framework for Cardiac Gating Using Artificial Neural Networks IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Article To more accurately trigger data acquisition and reduce radiation exposure of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), a multimodal framework utilizing both electrocardiography (ECG) and seismocardiography (SCG) for CCTA prospective gating is presented. Relying upon a three-layer artificial neural network that adaptively fuses individual ECG- and SCG-based quiescence predictions on a beat-by-beat basis, this framework yields a personalized quiescence prediction for each cardiac cycle. This framework was tested on seven healthy subjects (age: 22-48; m/f: 4/3) and eleven cardiac patients (age: 31-78; m/f: 6/5). Seventeen out of 18 benefited from the fusion-based prediction as compared to the ECG-only-based prediction, the traditional prospective gating method. Only one patient whose SCG was compromised by noise was more suitable for ECG-only-based prediction. On average, our fused ECG-SCG-based method improves cardiac quiescence prediction by 47% over ECG-only-based method; with both compared against the gold standard, B-mode echocardiography. Fusion-based prediction is also more resistant to heart rate variability than ECG-only- or SCG-only-based prediction. To assess the clinical value, the diagnostic quality of the CCTA reconstructed volumes from the quiescence derived from ECG-, SCG- and fusion-based predictions were graded by a board-certified radiologist using a Likert response format. Grading results indicated the fusion-based prediction improved diagnostic quality. ECG may be a sub-optimal modality for quiescence prediction and can be enhanced by the multimodal framework. The combination of ECG and SCG signals for quiescence prediction bears promise for a more personalized and reliable approach than ECG-only-based method to predict cardiac quiescence for prospective CCTA gating. IEEE 2018-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6204924/ /pubmed/30405976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2869141 Text en 2168-2372 © 2018 IEEE. Translations and content mining are permitted for academic research only. Personal use is also permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
spellingShingle Article
An Adaptive Seismocardiography (SCG)-ECG Multimodal Framework for Cardiac Gating Using Artificial Neural Networks
title An Adaptive Seismocardiography (SCG)-ECG Multimodal Framework for Cardiac Gating Using Artificial Neural Networks
title_full An Adaptive Seismocardiography (SCG)-ECG Multimodal Framework for Cardiac Gating Using Artificial Neural Networks
title_fullStr An Adaptive Seismocardiography (SCG)-ECG Multimodal Framework for Cardiac Gating Using Artificial Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed An Adaptive Seismocardiography (SCG)-ECG Multimodal Framework for Cardiac Gating Using Artificial Neural Networks
title_short An Adaptive Seismocardiography (SCG)-ECG Multimodal Framework for Cardiac Gating Using Artificial Neural Networks
title_sort adaptive seismocardiography (scg)-ecg multimodal framework for cardiac gating using artificial neural networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2869141
work_keys_str_mv AT anadaptiveseismocardiographyscgecgmultimodalframeworkforcardiacgatingusingartificialneuralnetworks
AT anadaptiveseismocardiographyscgecgmultimodalframeworkforcardiacgatingusingartificialneuralnetworks
AT anadaptiveseismocardiographyscgecgmultimodalframeworkforcardiacgatingusingartificialneuralnetworks
AT anadaptiveseismocardiographyscgecgmultimodalframeworkforcardiacgatingusingartificialneuralnetworks
AT anadaptiveseismocardiographyscgecgmultimodalframeworkforcardiacgatingusingartificialneuralnetworks
AT adaptiveseismocardiographyscgecgmultimodalframeworkforcardiacgatingusingartificialneuralnetworks
AT adaptiveseismocardiographyscgecgmultimodalframeworkforcardiacgatingusingartificialneuralnetworks
AT adaptiveseismocardiographyscgecgmultimodalframeworkforcardiacgatingusingartificialneuralnetworks
AT adaptiveseismocardiographyscgecgmultimodalframeworkforcardiacgatingusingartificialneuralnetworks
AT adaptiveseismocardiographyscgecgmultimodalframeworkforcardiacgatingusingartificialneuralnetworks