Cargando…
A new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study
PURPOSE: Coil embolization is a minimally invasive method used to treat cerebral aneurysms. Although this endovascular treatment has a high success rate, aneurysmal re-treatment due to recanalization remains a major problem of this method. The purpose of this study was to determine a combined parame...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013433 |
_version_ | 1783366114819964928 |
---|---|
author | Fujimura, Soichiro Takao, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Takashi Dahmani, Chihebeddine Ishibashi, Toshihiro Mamori, Hiroya Yamamoto, Makoto Murayama, Yuichi |
author_facet | Fujimura, Soichiro Takao, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Takashi Dahmani, Chihebeddine Ishibashi, Toshihiro Mamori, Hiroya Yamamoto, Makoto Murayama, Yuichi |
author_sort | Fujimura, Soichiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Coil embolization is a minimally invasive method used to treat cerebral aneurysms. Although this endovascular treatment has a high success rate, aneurysmal re-treatment due to recanalization remains a major problem of this method. The purpose of this study was to determine a combined parameter that can be useful for predicting aneurysmal re-treatment due to recanalization. METHODS: Patient-specific geometries were used to retrospectively analyze the blood flow for 26 re-treated and 74 non-retreated aneurysms. Post-operatively aneurysms were evaluated at 12-month follow-up. The hemodynamic differences between the re-treatment and non-retreatment aneurysms were analyzed before and after coil embolization using computation fluid dynamics. Basic fluid characteristics, rates of change, morphological factors of aneurysms and patient-specific clinical information were examined. Multivariable analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to determine a combined parameter—re-treatment predictor (RP). RESULTS: Among examined hemodynamic, morphological, and clinical parameters, slight reduction of blood flow velocity rate in the aneurysm, slight increase of pressure rate at the aneurysmal neck and neck area, and hypertension were the main factors contributing to re-treatment. Notably, hemodynamic parameters between re-treatment and non-retreatment groups before embolization were similar: however, we observed significant differences between the groups in the post-embolization average velocity and the rate of reduction in this velocity in the aneurysmal dome. CONCLUSIONS: The combined parameter, RP, which takes into consideration hemodynamic, morphological, and clinical parameters, accurately predicts aneurysm re-treatment. Calculation of RP before embolization may be able to predict the aneurysms that will require re-treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6204940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62049402018-11-08 A new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study Fujimura, Soichiro Takao, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Takashi Dahmani, Chihebeddine Ishibashi, Toshihiro Mamori, Hiroya Yamamoto, Makoto Murayama, Yuichi J Neurointerv Surg Basic Science PURPOSE: Coil embolization is a minimally invasive method used to treat cerebral aneurysms. Although this endovascular treatment has a high success rate, aneurysmal re-treatment due to recanalization remains a major problem of this method. The purpose of this study was to determine a combined parameter that can be useful for predicting aneurysmal re-treatment due to recanalization. METHODS: Patient-specific geometries were used to retrospectively analyze the blood flow for 26 re-treated and 74 non-retreated aneurysms. Post-operatively aneurysms were evaluated at 12-month follow-up. The hemodynamic differences between the re-treatment and non-retreatment aneurysms were analyzed before and after coil embolization using computation fluid dynamics. Basic fluid characteristics, rates of change, morphological factors of aneurysms and patient-specific clinical information were examined. Multivariable analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to determine a combined parameter—re-treatment predictor (RP). RESULTS: Among examined hemodynamic, morphological, and clinical parameters, slight reduction of blood flow velocity rate in the aneurysm, slight increase of pressure rate at the aneurysmal neck and neck area, and hypertension were the main factors contributing to re-treatment. Notably, hemodynamic parameters between re-treatment and non-retreatment groups before embolization were similar: however, we observed significant differences between the groups in the post-embolization average velocity and the rate of reduction in this velocity in the aneurysmal dome. CONCLUSIONS: The combined parameter, RP, which takes into consideration hemodynamic, morphological, and clinical parameters, accurately predicts aneurysm re-treatment. Calculation of RP before embolization may be able to predict the aneurysms that will require re-treatment. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6204940/ /pubmed/29246907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013433 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Basic Science Fujimura, Soichiro Takao, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Takashi Dahmani, Chihebeddine Ishibashi, Toshihiro Mamori, Hiroya Yamamoto, Makoto Murayama, Yuichi A new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study |
title | A new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study |
title_full | A new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study |
title_fullStr | A new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study |
title_full_unstemmed | A new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study |
title_short | A new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study |
title_sort | new combined parameter predicts re-treatment for coil-embolized aneurysms: a computational fluid dynamics multivariable analysis study |
topic | Basic Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29246907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujimurasoichiro anewcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT takaohiroyuki anewcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT suzukitakashi anewcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT dahmanichihebeddine anewcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT ishibashitoshihiro anewcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT mamorihiroya anewcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT yamamotomakoto anewcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT murayamayuichi anewcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT fujimurasoichiro newcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT takaohiroyuki newcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT suzukitakashi newcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT dahmanichihebeddine newcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT ishibashitoshihiro newcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT mamorihiroya newcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT yamamotomakoto newcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy AT murayamayuichi newcombinedparameterpredictsretreatmentforcoilembolizedaneurysmsacomputationalfluiddynamicsmultivariableanalysisstudy |