Cargando…
Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
BACKGROUND: Previous models of Hospital at Home (HAH) for COPD exacerbation (ECOPD) were limited by the lack of a reliable prognostic score to guide patient selection. Approximately 50% of hospitalised patients have a low mortality risk by DECAF, thus are potentially suitable. METHODS: In a non-infe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29680821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211197 |
_version_ | 1783366118459572224 |
---|---|
author | Echevarria, Carlos Gray, Joanne Hartley, Tom Steer, John Miller, Jonathan Simpson, A John Gibson, G John Bourke, Stephen C |
author_facet | Echevarria, Carlos Gray, Joanne Hartley, Tom Steer, John Miller, Jonathan Simpson, A John Gibson, G John Bourke, Stephen C |
author_sort | Echevarria, Carlos |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous models of Hospital at Home (HAH) for COPD exacerbation (ECOPD) were limited by the lack of a reliable prognostic score to guide patient selection. Approximately 50% of hospitalised patients have a low mortality risk by DECAF, thus are potentially suitable. METHODS: In a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial, 118 patients admitted with a low-risk ECOPD (DECAF 0 or 1) were recruited to HAH or usual care (UC). The primary outcome was health and social costs at 90 days. RESULTS: Mean 90-day costs were £1016 lower in HAH, but the one-sided 95% CI crossed the non-inferiority limit of £150 (CI −2343 to 312). Savings were primarily due to reduced hospital bed days: HAH=1 (IQR 1–7), UC=5 (IQR 2–12) (P=0.001). Length of stay during the index admission in UC was only 3 days, which was 2 days shorter than expected. Based on quality-adjusted life years, the probability of HAH being cost-effective was 90%. There was one death within 90 days in each arm, readmission rates were similar and 90% of patients preferred HAH for subsequent ECOPD. CONCLUSION: HAH selected by low-risk DECAF score was safe, clinically effective, cost-effective, and preferred by most patients. Compared with earlier models, selection is simpler and approximately twice as many patients are eligible. The introduction of DECAF was associated with a fall in UC length of stay without adverse outcome, supporting use of DECAF to direct early discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered prospectively ISRCTN29082260. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6204956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62049562018-11-08 Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation Echevarria, Carlos Gray, Joanne Hartley, Tom Steer, John Miller, Jonathan Simpson, A John Gibson, G John Bourke, Stephen C Thorax Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease BACKGROUND: Previous models of Hospital at Home (HAH) for COPD exacerbation (ECOPD) were limited by the lack of a reliable prognostic score to guide patient selection. Approximately 50% of hospitalised patients have a low mortality risk by DECAF, thus are potentially suitable. METHODS: In a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial, 118 patients admitted with a low-risk ECOPD (DECAF 0 or 1) were recruited to HAH or usual care (UC). The primary outcome was health and social costs at 90 days. RESULTS: Mean 90-day costs were £1016 lower in HAH, but the one-sided 95% CI crossed the non-inferiority limit of £150 (CI −2343 to 312). Savings were primarily due to reduced hospital bed days: HAH=1 (IQR 1–7), UC=5 (IQR 2–12) (P=0.001). Length of stay during the index admission in UC was only 3 days, which was 2 days shorter than expected. Based on quality-adjusted life years, the probability of HAH being cost-effective was 90%. There was one death within 90 days in each arm, readmission rates were similar and 90% of patients preferred HAH for subsequent ECOPD. CONCLUSION: HAH selected by low-risk DECAF score was safe, clinically effective, cost-effective, and preferred by most patients. Compared with earlier models, selection is simpler and approximately twice as many patients are eligible. The introduction of DECAF was associated with a fall in UC length of stay without adverse outcome, supporting use of DECAF to direct early discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered prospectively ISRCTN29082260. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08 2018-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6204956/ /pubmed/29680821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211197 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Echevarria, Carlos Gray, Joanne Hartley, Tom Steer, John Miller, Jonathan Simpson, A John Gibson, G John Bourke, Stephen C Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
title | Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
title_full | Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
title_fullStr | Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
title_short | Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
title_sort | home treatment of copd exacerbation selected by decaf score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
topic | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29680821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT echevarriacarlos hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT grayjoanne hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT hartleytom hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT steerjohn hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT millerjonathan hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT simpsonajohn hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT gibsongjohn hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT bourkestephenc hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation |