Cargando…

Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND: Previous models of Hospital at Home (HAH) for COPD exacerbation (ECOPD) were limited by the lack of a reliable prognostic score to guide patient selection. Approximately 50% of hospitalised patients have a low mortality risk by DECAF, thus are potentially suitable. METHODS: In a non-infe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Echevarria, Carlos, Gray, Joanne, Hartley, Tom, Steer, John, Miller, Jonathan, Simpson, A John, Gibson, G John, Bourke, Stephen C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29680821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211197
_version_ 1783366118459572224
author Echevarria, Carlos
Gray, Joanne
Hartley, Tom
Steer, John
Miller, Jonathan
Simpson, A John
Gibson, G John
Bourke, Stephen C
author_facet Echevarria, Carlos
Gray, Joanne
Hartley, Tom
Steer, John
Miller, Jonathan
Simpson, A John
Gibson, G John
Bourke, Stephen C
author_sort Echevarria, Carlos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous models of Hospital at Home (HAH) for COPD exacerbation (ECOPD) were limited by the lack of a reliable prognostic score to guide patient selection. Approximately 50% of hospitalised patients have a low mortality risk by DECAF, thus are potentially suitable. METHODS: In a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial, 118 patients admitted with a low-risk ECOPD (DECAF 0 or 1) were recruited to HAH or usual care (UC). The primary outcome was health and social costs at 90 days. RESULTS: Mean 90-day costs were £1016 lower in HAH, but the one-sided 95% CI crossed the non-inferiority limit of £150 (CI −2343 to 312). Savings were primarily due to reduced hospital bed days: HAH=1 (IQR 1–7), UC=5 (IQR 2–12) (P=0.001). Length of stay during the index admission in UC was only 3 days, which was 2 days shorter than expected. Based on quality-adjusted life years, the probability of HAH being cost-effective was 90%. There was one death within 90 days in each arm, readmission rates were similar and 90% of patients preferred HAH for subsequent ECOPD. CONCLUSION: HAH selected by low-risk DECAF score was safe, clinically effective, cost-effective, and preferred by most patients. Compared with earlier models, selection is simpler and approximately twice as many patients are eligible. The introduction of DECAF was associated with a fall in UC length of stay without adverse outcome, supporting use of DECAF to direct early discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered prospectively ISRCTN29082260.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62049562018-11-08 Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation Echevarria, Carlos Gray, Joanne Hartley, Tom Steer, John Miller, Jonathan Simpson, A John Gibson, G John Bourke, Stephen C Thorax Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease BACKGROUND: Previous models of Hospital at Home (HAH) for COPD exacerbation (ECOPD) were limited by the lack of a reliable prognostic score to guide patient selection. Approximately 50% of hospitalised patients have a low mortality risk by DECAF, thus are potentially suitable. METHODS: In a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial, 118 patients admitted with a low-risk ECOPD (DECAF 0 or 1) were recruited to HAH or usual care (UC). The primary outcome was health and social costs at 90 days. RESULTS: Mean 90-day costs were £1016 lower in HAH, but the one-sided 95% CI crossed the non-inferiority limit of £150 (CI −2343 to 312). Savings were primarily due to reduced hospital bed days: HAH=1 (IQR 1–7), UC=5 (IQR 2–12) (P=0.001). Length of stay during the index admission in UC was only 3 days, which was 2 days shorter than expected. Based on quality-adjusted life years, the probability of HAH being cost-effective was 90%. There was one death within 90 days in each arm, readmission rates were similar and 90% of patients preferred HAH for subsequent ECOPD. CONCLUSION: HAH selected by low-risk DECAF score was safe, clinically effective, cost-effective, and preferred by most patients. Compared with earlier models, selection is simpler and approximately twice as many patients are eligible. The introduction of DECAF was associated with a fall in UC length of stay without adverse outcome, supporting use of DECAF to direct early discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered prospectively ISRCTN29082260. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08 2018-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6204956/ /pubmed/29680821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211197 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Echevarria, Carlos
Gray, Joanne
Hartley, Tom
Steer, John
Miller, Jonathan
Simpson, A John
Gibson, G John
Bourke, Stephen C
Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title_full Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title_fullStr Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title_short Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title_sort home treatment of copd exacerbation selected by decaf score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
topic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29680821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211197
work_keys_str_mv AT echevarriacarlos hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT grayjoanne hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT hartleytom hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT steerjohn hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT millerjonathan hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT simpsonajohn hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT gibsongjohn hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT bourkestephenc hometreatmentofcopdexacerbationselectedbydecafscoreanoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation