Cargando…

Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions

BACKGROUND: Many public health interventions cannot be evaluated using randomised controlled trials so they rely on the assessment of observational data. Techniques for evaluating public health interventions using observational data include interrupted time series analysis, panel data regression-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouttell, Janet, Craig, Peter, Lewsey, James, Robinson, Mark, Popham, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-210106
_version_ 1783366121088352256
author Bouttell, Janet
Craig, Peter
Lewsey, James
Robinson, Mark
Popham, Frank
author_facet Bouttell, Janet
Craig, Peter
Lewsey, James
Robinson, Mark
Popham, Frank
author_sort Bouttell, Janet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many public health interventions cannot be evaluated using randomised controlled trials so they rely on the assessment of observational data. Techniques for evaluating public health interventions using observational data include interrupted time series analysis, panel data regression-based approaches, regression discontinuity and instrumental variable approaches. The inclusion of a counterfactual improves causal inference for approaches based on time series analysis, but the selection of a suitable counterfactual or control area can be problematic. The synthetic control method builds a counterfactual using a weighted combination of potential control units. METHODS: We explain the synthetic control method, summarise its use in health research to date, set out its advantages, assumptions and limitations and describe its implementation through a case study of life expectancy following German reunification. RESULTS: Advantages of the synthetic control method are that it offers an approach suitable when there is a small number of treated units and control units and it does not rely on parallel preimplementation trends like difference in difference methods. The credibility of the result relies on achieving a good preimplementation fit for the outcome of interest between treated unit and synthetic control. If a good preimplementation fit is established over an extended period of time, a discrepancy in the outcome variable following the intervention can be interpreted as an intervention effect. It is critical that the synthetic control is built from a pool of potential controls that are similar to the treated unit. There is currently no consensus on what constitutes a ‘good fit’ or how to judge similarity. Traditional statistical inference is not appropriate with this approach, although alternatives are available. From our review, we noted that the synthetic control method has been underused in public health. CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic control methods are a valuable addition to the range of approaches for evaluating public health interventions when randomisation is impractical. They deserve to be more widely applied, ideally in combination with other methods so that the dependence of findings on particular assumptions can be assessed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6204967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62049672018-11-08 Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions Bouttell, Janet Craig, Peter Lewsey, James Robinson, Mark Popham, Frank J Epidemiol Community Health Theory and Methods BACKGROUND: Many public health interventions cannot be evaluated using randomised controlled trials so they rely on the assessment of observational data. Techniques for evaluating public health interventions using observational data include interrupted time series analysis, panel data regression-based approaches, regression discontinuity and instrumental variable approaches. The inclusion of a counterfactual improves causal inference for approaches based on time series analysis, but the selection of a suitable counterfactual or control area can be problematic. The synthetic control method builds a counterfactual using a weighted combination of potential control units. METHODS: We explain the synthetic control method, summarise its use in health research to date, set out its advantages, assumptions and limitations and describe its implementation through a case study of life expectancy following German reunification. RESULTS: Advantages of the synthetic control method are that it offers an approach suitable when there is a small number of treated units and control units and it does not rely on parallel preimplementation trends like difference in difference methods. The credibility of the result relies on achieving a good preimplementation fit for the outcome of interest between treated unit and synthetic control. If a good preimplementation fit is established over an extended period of time, a discrepancy in the outcome variable following the intervention can be interpreted as an intervention effect. It is critical that the synthetic control is built from a pool of potential controls that are similar to the treated unit. There is currently no consensus on what constitutes a ‘good fit’ or how to judge similarity. Traditional statistical inference is not appropriate with this approach, although alternatives are available. From our review, we noted that the synthetic control method has been underused in public health. CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic control methods are a valuable addition to the range of approaches for evaluating public health interventions when randomisation is impractical. They deserve to be more widely applied, ideally in combination with other methods so that the dependence of findings on particular assumptions can be assessed. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08 2018-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6204967/ /pubmed/29653993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-210106 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Theory and Methods
Bouttell, Janet
Craig, Peter
Lewsey, James
Robinson, Mark
Popham, Frank
Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions
title Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions
title_full Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions
title_fullStr Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions
title_full_unstemmed Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions
title_short Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions
title_sort synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions
topic Theory and Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-210106
work_keys_str_mv AT bouttelljanet syntheticcontrolmethodologyasatoolforevaluatingpopulationlevelhealthinterventions
AT craigpeter syntheticcontrolmethodologyasatoolforevaluatingpopulationlevelhealthinterventions
AT lewseyjames syntheticcontrolmethodologyasatoolforevaluatingpopulationlevelhealthinterventions
AT robinsonmark syntheticcontrolmethodologyasatoolforevaluatingpopulationlevelhealthinterventions
AT pophamfrank syntheticcontrolmethodologyasatoolforevaluatingpopulationlevelhealthinterventions