Cargando…

Clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow-up()

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and functional results of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of one year. METHODS: Twenty-two patients submitted to shoulder reverse arthroplasty by the Surgery and Shoulder Rehabilitation Group were retrospectively evaluated with pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: França, Flávio de Oliveira, Freitas, José Marcio Alves, Godinho, Pedro Couto, Gonçalves, Dermerson Martins, Vieira, Tertuliano, Pereira, Ulisses Silva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.10.012
_version_ 1783366126827208704
author França, Flávio de Oliveira
Freitas, José Marcio Alves
Godinho, Pedro Couto
Gonçalves, Dermerson Martins
Vieira, Tertuliano
Pereira, Ulisses Silva
author_facet França, Flávio de Oliveira
Freitas, José Marcio Alves
Godinho, Pedro Couto
Gonçalves, Dermerson Martins
Vieira, Tertuliano
Pereira, Ulisses Silva
author_sort França, Flávio de Oliveira
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and functional results of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of one year. METHODS: Twenty-two patients submitted to shoulder reverse arthroplasty by the Surgery and Shoulder Rehabilitation Group were retrospectively evaluated with pre and postoperative imaging analysis, analog pain scale, range of motion, and ASES functional score. RESULTS: Out of 19 (86.3%) patients with preoperative ASES classified as poor/bad, 11 (57.9%) progress to good/excellent after intervention, showing improvement of function, ranging from a mean preoperative ASES score of 22 (± 18.8) to a postoperative mean of 64.8 (± 27.7) (p = 0.031). Regarding the pain, there was an improvement in analog pain scale, presenting a preoperative mean of 7.64 (1–10) and a postoperative mean of 2.09 (0–7; p < 0.001). Regarding mobility, of 22 patients, 15 (68.2%) had preoperative pseudoparalysis and, of these, ten (66.7%) had an active anterior elevation greater than 90° after reverse arthroplasty. In turn, patients without pseudoparalysis had no significant gain in range of motion (p = 0.002). The authors observed active anterior elevation gain, with a preoperative mean of 76° (0–160°) and a postoperative mean of 111° (0–160°; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Despite being a relatively new procedure in Brazil, reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be used effectively and safely in patients who were previously without treatment options such as rotator cuff arthropathy and revisions providing pain relief, improvement of function, and mobility of the upper limb.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6205010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62050102018-10-30 Clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow-up() França, Flávio de Oliveira Freitas, José Marcio Alves Godinho, Pedro Couto Gonçalves, Dermerson Martins Vieira, Tertuliano Pereira, Ulisses Silva Rev Bras Ortop Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and functional results of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of one year. METHODS: Twenty-two patients submitted to shoulder reverse arthroplasty by the Surgery and Shoulder Rehabilitation Group were retrospectively evaluated with pre and postoperative imaging analysis, analog pain scale, range of motion, and ASES functional score. RESULTS: Out of 19 (86.3%) patients with preoperative ASES classified as poor/bad, 11 (57.9%) progress to good/excellent after intervention, showing improvement of function, ranging from a mean preoperative ASES score of 22 (± 18.8) to a postoperative mean of 64.8 (± 27.7) (p = 0.031). Regarding the pain, there was an improvement in analog pain scale, presenting a preoperative mean of 7.64 (1–10) and a postoperative mean of 2.09 (0–7; p < 0.001). Regarding mobility, of 22 patients, 15 (68.2%) had preoperative pseudoparalysis and, of these, ten (66.7%) had an active anterior elevation greater than 90° after reverse arthroplasty. In turn, patients without pseudoparalysis had no significant gain in range of motion (p = 0.002). The authors observed active anterior elevation gain, with a preoperative mean of 76° (0–160°) and a postoperative mean of 111° (0–160°; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Despite being a relatively new procedure in Brazil, reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be used effectively and safely in patients who were previously without treatment options such as rotator cuff arthropathy and revisions providing pain relief, improvement of function, and mobility of the upper limb. Elsevier 2018-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6205010/ /pubmed/30377605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.10.012 Text en © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
França, Flávio de Oliveira
Freitas, José Marcio Alves
Godinho, Pedro Couto
Gonçalves, Dermerson Martins
Vieira, Tertuliano
Pereira, Ulisses Silva
Clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow-up()
title Clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow-up()
title_full Clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow-up()
title_fullStr Clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow-up()
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow-up()
title_short Clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow-up()
title_sort clinical and functional evaluation of patients submitted to reverse arthroplasty with minimum one year of follow-up()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30377605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.10.012
work_keys_str_mv AT francaflaviodeoliveira clinicalandfunctionalevaluationofpatientssubmittedtoreversearthroplastywithminimumoneyearoffollowup
AT freitasjosemarcioalves clinicalandfunctionalevaluationofpatientssubmittedtoreversearthroplastywithminimumoneyearoffollowup
AT godinhopedrocouto clinicalandfunctionalevaluationofpatientssubmittedtoreversearthroplastywithminimumoneyearoffollowup
AT goncalvesdermersonmartins clinicalandfunctionalevaluationofpatientssubmittedtoreversearthroplastywithminimumoneyearoffollowup
AT vieiratertuliano clinicalandfunctionalevaluationofpatientssubmittedtoreversearthroplastywithminimumoneyearoffollowup
AT pereiraulissessilva clinicalandfunctionalevaluationofpatientssubmittedtoreversearthroplastywithminimumoneyearoffollowup