Cargando…
A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site
OBJECTIVES: Fractal analysis of the radiographic pattern of bone has been used to evaluate its quantitative properties. However, the relation between initial implant stability and quality of bone remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate RFA values in relation to the fractal dimen...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4357627 |
_version_ | 1783366142309433344 |
---|---|
author | Kulczyk, Tomasz Czajka-Jakubowska, Agata Przystańska, Agnieszka |
author_facet | Kulczyk, Tomasz Czajka-Jakubowska, Agata Przystańska, Agnieszka |
author_sort | Kulczyk, Tomasz |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Fractal analysis of the radiographic pattern of bone has been used to evaluate its quantitative properties. However, the relation between initial implant stability and quality of bone remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate RFA values in relation to the fractal dimension of bone where the implant was inserted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 50 two-stage dental implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible of 32 patients. After implant placement, an implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured in two perpendicular planes. On intraoral digital periapical radiographs, three 35x35 pixels' regions of interest (ROIs) were chosen covering the bone adjacent to the neck (ROI 1), middle (ROI 2), and apical (ROI 3) part of the implant, respectively. For every ROI, a fractal dimension (FD) was calculated. A linear correlation, as well as a logistic regression analysis, was used to identify a possible relation between the ISQ and FD values for every ROI in the maxilla and mandible. RESULTS: The ISQ and FD values were found to be correlated at ROI 1 for the maxilla. There was no linear correlation between ISQ and FD values in any of the three ROIs in the mandible. However, logistic regression analysis showed that in ROI 1 and ROI 3 the values of FD and ISQ are statistically important and may be used to express the difference between maxilla and mandible. CONCLUSION: The fractal dimension of alveolar bone measured from intraoral digital radiographs alone may be an insufficient parameter to determine initial implant stability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6205094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62050942018-11-08 A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site Kulczyk, Tomasz Czajka-Jakubowska, Agata Przystańska, Agnieszka Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVES: Fractal analysis of the radiographic pattern of bone has been used to evaluate its quantitative properties. However, the relation between initial implant stability and quality of bone remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate RFA values in relation to the fractal dimension of bone where the implant was inserted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 50 two-stage dental implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible of 32 patients. After implant placement, an implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured in two perpendicular planes. On intraoral digital periapical radiographs, three 35x35 pixels' regions of interest (ROIs) were chosen covering the bone adjacent to the neck (ROI 1), middle (ROI 2), and apical (ROI 3) part of the implant, respectively. For every ROI, a fractal dimension (FD) was calculated. A linear correlation, as well as a logistic regression analysis, was used to identify a possible relation between the ISQ and FD values for every ROI in the maxilla and mandible. RESULTS: The ISQ and FD values were found to be correlated at ROI 1 for the maxilla. There was no linear correlation between ISQ and FD values in any of the three ROIs in the mandible. However, logistic regression analysis showed that in ROI 1 and ROI 3 the values of FD and ISQ are statistically important and may be used to express the difference between maxilla and mandible. CONCLUSION: The fractal dimension of alveolar bone measured from intraoral digital radiographs alone may be an insufficient parameter to determine initial implant stability. Hindawi 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6205094/ /pubmed/30410933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4357627 Text en Copyright © 2018 Tomasz Kulczyk et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kulczyk, Tomasz Czajka-Jakubowska, Agata Przystańska, Agnieszka A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site |
title | A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site |
title_full | A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site |
title_fullStr | A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site |
title_short | A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site |
title_sort | comparison between the implant stability quotient and the fractal dimension of alveolar bone at the implant site |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4357627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kulczyktomasz acomparisonbetweentheimplantstabilityquotientandthefractaldimensionofalveolarboneattheimplantsite AT czajkajakubowskaagata acomparisonbetweentheimplantstabilityquotientandthefractaldimensionofalveolarboneattheimplantsite AT przystanskaagnieszka acomparisonbetweentheimplantstabilityquotientandthefractaldimensionofalveolarboneattheimplantsite AT kulczyktomasz comparisonbetweentheimplantstabilityquotientandthefractaldimensionofalveolarboneattheimplantsite AT czajkajakubowskaagata comparisonbetweentheimplantstabilityquotientandthefractaldimensionofalveolarboneattheimplantsite AT przystanskaagnieszka comparisonbetweentheimplantstabilityquotientandthefractaldimensionofalveolarboneattheimplantsite |