Cargando…

Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The use of inappropriate elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) has decreased over time, but hospital-level variation in the use of inappropriate PCI persists. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) guidelines may in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambert-Kerzner, Anne, Maynard, Charles, McCreight, Marina, Ladebue, Amy, Williams, Katherine M., Fehling, Kelty B., Bradley, Steven M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30103677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0901-6
_version_ 1783366155371544576
author Lambert-Kerzner, Anne
Maynard, Charles
McCreight, Marina
Ladebue, Amy
Williams, Katherine M.
Fehling, Kelty B.
Bradley, Steven M.
author_facet Lambert-Kerzner, Anne
Maynard, Charles
McCreight, Marina
Ladebue, Amy
Williams, Katherine M.
Fehling, Kelty B.
Bradley, Steven M.
author_sort Lambert-Kerzner, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of inappropriate elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) has decreased over time, but hospital-level variation in the use of inappropriate PCI persists. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) guidelines may inform efforts to improve elective PCI appropriateness. METHODS: All hospitals performing PCI in Washington State were categorized by their use of inappropriate elective PCI in 2010 to 2013. Semi-structured, qualitative telephone interviews were then conducted with 17 individual interviews at 13 sites in Washington State to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the AUC guidelines. An inductive and deductive, team-based analytical approach, drawing primarily on Matrix analysis was performed to identify factors affecting implementation of the AUC. RESULTS: Specific facilitators were identified that supported successful implementation of the AUC. These included collaborative catheterization laboratory environments that allow all staff to participate with questions and opinions; ongoing AUC education with catheterization laboratory teams and referring providers; internal AUC peer review processes; interventional cardiologist be directly involved with the pre-procedural review process; checklist-based algorithms for pre-procedural documentation; systems redesign to include insurance companies; and AUC educational information with patients. Barriers to implementation of the AUC included external pressures, such as competition for patients, and the lack of shared medical records with sites that referred patients for coronary angiography. CONCLUSIONS: The identified facilitators enabled sites to successfully implement the AUC. Catheterization laboratories struggling to successfully implement the AUC may consider utilizing these strategies to improve their processes to improve patient selection for elective PCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6205154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62051542018-10-31 Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study Lambert-Kerzner, Anne Maynard, Charles McCreight, Marina Ladebue, Amy Williams, Katherine M. Fehling, Kelty B. Bradley, Steven M. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of inappropriate elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) has decreased over time, but hospital-level variation in the use of inappropriate PCI persists. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) guidelines may inform efforts to improve elective PCI appropriateness. METHODS: All hospitals performing PCI in Washington State were categorized by their use of inappropriate elective PCI in 2010 to 2013. Semi-structured, qualitative telephone interviews were then conducted with 17 individual interviews at 13 sites in Washington State to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the AUC guidelines. An inductive and deductive, team-based analytical approach, drawing primarily on Matrix analysis was performed to identify factors affecting implementation of the AUC. RESULTS: Specific facilitators were identified that supported successful implementation of the AUC. These included collaborative catheterization laboratory environments that allow all staff to participate with questions and opinions; ongoing AUC education with catheterization laboratory teams and referring providers; internal AUC peer review processes; interventional cardiologist be directly involved with the pre-procedural review process; checklist-based algorithms for pre-procedural documentation; systems redesign to include insurance companies; and AUC educational information with patients. Barriers to implementation of the AUC included external pressures, such as competition for patients, and the lack of shared medical records with sites that referred patients for coronary angiography. CONCLUSIONS: The identified facilitators enabled sites to successfully implement the AUC. Catheterization laboratories struggling to successfully implement the AUC may consider utilizing these strategies to improve their processes to improve patient selection for elective PCI. BioMed Central 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6205154/ /pubmed/30103677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0901-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lambert-Kerzner, Anne
Maynard, Charles
McCreight, Marina
Ladebue, Amy
Williams, Katherine M.
Fehling, Kelty B.
Bradley, Steven M.
Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study
title Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study
title_full Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study
title_short Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study
title_sort assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30103677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0901-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lambertkerzneranne assessmentofbarriersandfacilitatorsintheimplementationofappropriateusecriteriaforelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsaqualitativestudy
AT maynardcharles assessmentofbarriersandfacilitatorsintheimplementationofappropriateusecriteriaforelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsaqualitativestudy
AT mccreightmarina assessmentofbarriersandfacilitatorsintheimplementationofappropriateusecriteriaforelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsaqualitativestudy
AT ladebueamy assessmentofbarriersandfacilitatorsintheimplementationofappropriateusecriteriaforelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsaqualitativestudy
AT williamskatherinem assessmentofbarriersandfacilitatorsintheimplementationofappropriateusecriteriaforelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsaqualitativestudy
AT fehlingkeltyb assessmentofbarriersandfacilitatorsintheimplementationofappropriateusecriteriaforelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsaqualitativestudy
AT bradleystevenm assessmentofbarriersandfacilitatorsintheimplementationofappropriateusecriteriaforelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsaqualitativestudy