Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of GeneXpert and LED-FM for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Early and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis is a priority for TB programs globally to initiate treatment early and improve treatment outcomes. Currently, Ziehl–Neelsen (ZN) stain-based microscopy, GeneXpert and Light Emitting Diode-Fluorescence Microscopy (LED-FM) are used for diagnosin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30372436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205233 |
_version_ | 1783366209250525184 |
---|---|
author | Sagili, Karuna D. Muniyandi, Malaisamy Nilgiriwala, Kayzad Soli Shringarpure, Kalpita S. Satyanarayana, Srinath Kirubakaran, Richard Chadha, Sarabjit S. Tharyan, Prathap |
author_facet | Sagili, Karuna D. Muniyandi, Malaisamy Nilgiriwala, Kayzad Soli Shringarpure, Kalpita S. Satyanarayana, Srinath Kirubakaran, Richard Chadha, Sarabjit S. Tharyan, Prathap |
author_sort | Sagili, Karuna D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis is a priority for TB programs globally to initiate treatment early and improve treatment outcomes. Currently, Ziehl–Neelsen (ZN) stain-based microscopy, GeneXpert and Light Emitting Diode-Fluorescence Microscopy (LED-FM) are used for diagnosing pulmonary drug sensitive tuberculosis. Published evidence synthesising the cost-effectiveness of these diagnostic tools is scarce. METHODOLOGY: PubMed, EMBASE and Cost-effectiveness analysis registry were searched for studies that reported on the cost-effectiveness of GeneXpert and LED-FM, compared to ZN microscopy for diagnosing pulmonary TB. Risk of bias was assessed independently by four authors using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) extended checklist. The data variables included the study settings, population, type of intervention, type of comparator, year of study, duration of study, type of study design, costs for the test and the comparator and effectiveness indicators. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used for assessing the relative cost-effectiveness in this review. RESULTS: Of the 496 studies identified by the search, thirteen studies were included after removing duplicates and studies that did not fulfil inclusion criteria. Four studies compared LED-FM with ZN and nine studies compared GeneXpert with ZN. Three studies used patient cohorts and eight were modelling studies with hypothetical cohorts used to evaluate cost-effectiveness. All these studies were conducted from a health system perspective, with four studies utilising cost utility analysis. There were considerable variations in costing parameters and effectiveness indicators that precluded meta-analysis. The key findings from the included studies suggest that LED-FM and GeneXpert may be cost effective for pulmonary TB diagnosis from a health system perspective. CONCLUSION: Our review identifies a consistent trend of the cost effectiveness of LED-FM and GeneXpert for pulmonary TB diagnosis in different countries with diverse context of socio-economic condition, HIV burden and geographical distribution. However, all the studies used different parameters to estimate the impact of these tools and this underscores the need for improving the methodological issues related to the conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6205591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62055912018-11-19 Cost-effectiveness of GeneXpert and LED-FM for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review Sagili, Karuna D. Muniyandi, Malaisamy Nilgiriwala, Kayzad Soli Shringarpure, Kalpita S. Satyanarayana, Srinath Kirubakaran, Richard Chadha, Sarabjit S. Tharyan, Prathap PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Early and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis is a priority for TB programs globally to initiate treatment early and improve treatment outcomes. Currently, Ziehl–Neelsen (ZN) stain-based microscopy, GeneXpert and Light Emitting Diode-Fluorescence Microscopy (LED-FM) are used for diagnosing pulmonary drug sensitive tuberculosis. Published evidence synthesising the cost-effectiveness of these diagnostic tools is scarce. METHODOLOGY: PubMed, EMBASE and Cost-effectiveness analysis registry were searched for studies that reported on the cost-effectiveness of GeneXpert and LED-FM, compared to ZN microscopy for diagnosing pulmonary TB. Risk of bias was assessed independently by four authors using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) extended checklist. The data variables included the study settings, population, type of intervention, type of comparator, year of study, duration of study, type of study design, costs for the test and the comparator and effectiveness indicators. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used for assessing the relative cost-effectiveness in this review. RESULTS: Of the 496 studies identified by the search, thirteen studies were included after removing duplicates and studies that did not fulfil inclusion criteria. Four studies compared LED-FM with ZN and nine studies compared GeneXpert with ZN. Three studies used patient cohorts and eight were modelling studies with hypothetical cohorts used to evaluate cost-effectiveness. All these studies were conducted from a health system perspective, with four studies utilising cost utility analysis. There were considerable variations in costing parameters and effectiveness indicators that precluded meta-analysis. The key findings from the included studies suggest that LED-FM and GeneXpert may be cost effective for pulmonary TB diagnosis from a health system perspective. CONCLUSION: Our review identifies a consistent trend of the cost effectiveness of LED-FM and GeneXpert for pulmonary TB diagnosis in different countries with diverse context of socio-economic condition, HIV burden and geographical distribution. However, all the studies used different parameters to estimate the impact of these tools and this underscores the need for improving the methodological issues related to the conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness studies. Public Library of Science 2018-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6205591/ /pubmed/30372436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205233 Text en © 2018 Sagili et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sagili, Karuna D. Muniyandi, Malaisamy Nilgiriwala, Kayzad Soli Shringarpure, Kalpita S. Satyanarayana, Srinath Kirubakaran, Richard Chadha, Sarabjit S. Tharyan, Prathap Cost-effectiveness of GeneXpert and LED-FM for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review |
title | Cost-effectiveness of GeneXpert and LED-FM for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of GeneXpert and LED-FM for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of GeneXpert and LED-FM for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of GeneXpert and LED-FM for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of GeneXpert and LED-FM for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of genexpert and led-fm for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30372436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sagilikarunad costeffectivenessofgenexpertandledfmfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreview AT muniyandimalaisamy costeffectivenessofgenexpertandledfmfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreview AT nilgiriwalakayzadsoli costeffectivenessofgenexpertandledfmfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreview AT shringarpurekalpitas costeffectivenessofgenexpertandledfmfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreview AT satyanarayanasrinath costeffectivenessofgenexpertandledfmfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreview AT kirubakaranrichard costeffectivenessofgenexpertandledfmfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreview AT chadhasarabjits costeffectivenessofgenexpertandledfmfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreview AT tharyanprathap costeffectivenessofgenexpertandledfmfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreview |