Cargando…

Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND: Treating proximal humerus fractures can be challenging because of large metaphyseal defects that conceal anatomical landmarks. In such cases, medial cortical support with, for example, calcar screws, is mandatory. Nevertheless, varus dislocations and implant failures in patients with imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Theopold, Jan, Schleifenbaum, Stefan, Müller, Mirijam, Werner, Michael, Hammer, Niels, Josten, Christoph, Hepp, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30372476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206349
_version_ 1783366240362823680
author Theopold, Jan
Schleifenbaum, Stefan
Müller, Mirijam
Werner, Michael
Hammer, Niels
Josten, Christoph
Hepp, Pierre
author_facet Theopold, Jan
Schleifenbaum, Stefan
Müller, Mirijam
Werner, Michael
Hammer, Niels
Josten, Christoph
Hepp, Pierre
author_sort Theopold, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treating proximal humerus fractures can be challenging because of large metaphyseal defects that conceal anatomical landmarks. In such cases, medial cortical support with, for example, calcar screws, is mandatory. Nevertheless, varus dislocations and implant failures in patients with impaired bone quality persist. Thus, the need for effective treatment of these patients exists. Hybrid double plate osteosynthesis was introduced as an alternative, yielding similar results as calcar screws. However, a biomechanical comparison of the stability of these two techniques is pending. METHODS: Cadaveric humeral specimens were treated with plate osteosynthesis and calcar screws (group 1, n = 9) or hybrid double plate osteosynthesis (group 2, n = 9) using a proximal humerus fracture model with a two-part fracture. Displacement, stiffness, failure mode, and ultimate load were examined biomechanically in a cyclic compressive-loading scenario. RESULTS: Although the hybrid double plate osteosynthesis (group 2) tended to confer higher stiffnesses than the medial support screws at higher cycles (group 1), this trend was below the level of significance. The displacement revealed non-significantly lower values for group 1 as compared with group 2 for cycles 50 and 2000, but at 5000 cycles, group 2 offered non-significantly lower displacement values than group 1. The ultimate load tended to be non-significantly higher in the hybrid double plate osteosynthesis group (group 2: 1342±369 N, group 1: 855±408 N). Both groups yielded similar failure rates, with the majority of failures in group 2 being gap closures (n = 8), whereas those in group 1 being plate dislocations (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an additive plate osteosynthesis in the region of the bicipital groove may be a potential alternative to the previously-established method of using calcar screws. The biomechanical data obtained in this study suggests that hybrid double plate osteosynthesis is as rigid and robust as calcar screws.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6205804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62058042018-11-19 Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures Theopold, Jan Schleifenbaum, Stefan Müller, Mirijam Werner, Michael Hammer, Niels Josten, Christoph Hepp, Pierre PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Treating proximal humerus fractures can be challenging because of large metaphyseal defects that conceal anatomical landmarks. In such cases, medial cortical support with, for example, calcar screws, is mandatory. Nevertheless, varus dislocations and implant failures in patients with impaired bone quality persist. Thus, the need for effective treatment of these patients exists. Hybrid double plate osteosynthesis was introduced as an alternative, yielding similar results as calcar screws. However, a biomechanical comparison of the stability of these two techniques is pending. METHODS: Cadaveric humeral specimens were treated with plate osteosynthesis and calcar screws (group 1, n = 9) or hybrid double plate osteosynthesis (group 2, n = 9) using a proximal humerus fracture model with a two-part fracture. Displacement, stiffness, failure mode, and ultimate load were examined biomechanically in a cyclic compressive-loading scenario. RESULTS: Although the hybrid double plate osteosynthesis (group 2) tended to confer higher stiffnesses than the medial support screws at higher cycles (group 1), this trend was below the level of significance. The displacement revealed non-significantly lower values for group 1 as compared with group 2 for cycles 50 and 2000, but at 5000 cycles, group 2 offered non-significantly lower displacement values than group 1. The ultimate load tended to be non-significantly higher in the hybrid double plate osteosynthesis group (group 2: 1342±369 N, group 1: 855±408 N). Both groups yielded similar failure rates, with the majority of failures in group 2 being gap closures (n = 8), whereas those in group 1 being plate dislocations (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an additive plate osteosynthesis in the region of the bicipital groove may be a potential alternative to the previously-established method of using calcar screws. The biomechanical data obtained in this study suggests that hybrid double plate osteosynthesis is as rigid and robust as calcar screws. Public Library of Science 2018-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6205804/ /pubmed/30372476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206349 Text en © 2018 Theopold et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Theopold, Jan
Schleifenbaum, Stefan
Müller, Mirijam
Werner, Michael
Hammer, Niels
Josten, Christoph
Hepp, Pierre
Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
title Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
title_full Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
title_fullStr Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
title_short Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30372476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206349
work_keys_str_mv AT theopoldjan biomechanicalevaluationofhybriddoubleplateosteosynthesisusingalockingplateandaninvertedthirdtubularplateforthetreatmentofproximalhumeralfractures
AT schleifenbaumstefan biomechanicalevaluationofhybriddoubleplateosteosynthesisusingalockingplateandaninvertedthirdtubularplateforthetreatmentofproximalhumeralfractures
AT mullermirijam biomechanicalevaluationofhybriddoubleplateosteosynthesisusingalockingplateandaninvertedthirdtubularplateforthetreatmentofproximalhumeralfractures
AT wernermichael biomechanicalevaluationofhybriddoubleplateosteosynthesisusingalockingplateandaninvertedthirdtubularplateforthetreatmentofproximalhumeralfractures
AT hammerniels biomechanicalevaluationofhybriddoubleplateosteosynthesisusingalockingplateandaninvertedthirdtubularplateforthetreatmentofproximalhumeralfractures
AT jostenchristoph biomechanicalevaluationofhybriddoubleplateosteosynthesisusingalockingplateandaninvertedthirdtubularplateforthetreatmentofproximalhumeralfractures
AT hepppierre biomechanicalevaluationofhybriddoubleplateosteosynthesisusingalockingplateandaninvertedthirdtubularplateforthetreatmentofproximalhumeralfractures