Cargando…

Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers

This study presents a comparison between the performances of two Finite Element (FE) solvers for the modeling of the poroelastic behavior of highly hydrated collagen hydrogels. Characterization of collagen hydrogels has been a widespread challenge since this is one of the most used natural biomateri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castro, André P. G., Yao, Jiang, Battisti, Tom, Lacroix, Damien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00142
_version_ 1783366265139625984
author Castro, André P. G.
Yao, Jiang
Battisti, Tom
Lacroix, Damien
author_facet Castro, André P. G.
Yao, Jiang
Battisti, Tom
Lacroix, Damien
author_sort Castro, André P. G.
collection PubMed
description This study presents a comparison between the performances of two Finite Element (FE) solvers for the modeling of the poroelastic behavior of highly hydrated collagen hydrogels. Characterization of collagen hydrogels has been a widespread challenge since this is one of the most used natural biomaterials for Tissue Engineering (TE) applications. V-Biomech® is a free custom FE solver oriented to soft tissue modeling, while Abaqus® is a general-purpose commercial FE package which is widely used for biomechanics computational modeling. Poroelastic simulations with both solvers were compared to two experimental protocols performed by Busby et al. (2013) and Chandran and Barocas (2004), also using different implementations of the frequently used Neo-Hookean hyperelastic model. The average differences between solvers outputs were under 5% throughout the different tests and hydrogel properties. Thus, differences were small enough to be considered negligible and within the variability found experimentally from one sample to another. This work demonstrates that constitutive modeling of soft tissues, such as collagen hydrogels can be achieved with either V-Biomech or Abaqus standard options (without user-subroutine), which is important for the biomechanics and biomaterials research community. V-Biomech has shown its potential for the validation of biomechanical characterization of soft tissues, while Abaqus' versatility is useful for the modeling and analysis of TE applications where other complex phenomena may also need to be captured.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6205953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62059532018-11-07 Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers Castro, André P. G. Yao, Jiang Battisti, Tom Lacroix, Damien Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology This study presents a comparison between the performances of two Finite Element (FE) solvers for the modeling of the poroelastic behavior of highly hydrated collagen hydrogels. Characterization of collagen hydrogels has been a widespread challenge since this is one of the most used natural biomaterials for Tissue Engineering (TE) applications. V-Biomech® is a free custom FE solver oriented to soft tissue modeling, while Abaqus® is a general-purpose commercial FE package which is widely used for biomechanics computational modeling. Poroelastic simulations with both solvers were compared to two experimental protocols performed by Busby et al. (2013) and Chandran and Barocas (2004), also using different implementations of the frequently used Neo-Hookean hyperelastic model. The average differences between solvers outputs were under 5% throughout the different tests and hydrogel properties. Thus, differences were small enough to be considered negligible and within the variability found experimentally from one sample to another. This work demonstrates that constitutive modeling of soft tissues, such as collagen hydrogels can be achieved with either V-Biomech or Abaqus standard options (without user-subroutine), which is important for the biomechanics and biomaterials research community. V-Biomech has shown its potential for the validation of biomechanical characterization of soft tissues, while Abaqus' versatility is useful for the modeling and analysis of TE applications where other complex phenomena may also need to be captured. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6205953/ /pubmed/30406091 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00142 Text en Copyright © 2018 Castro, Yao, Battisti and Lacroix. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Castro, André P. G.
Yao, Jiang
Battisti, Tom
Lacroix, Damien
Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers
title Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers
title_full Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers
title_fullStr Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers
title_full_unstemmed Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers
title_short Poroelastic Modeling of Highly Hydrated Collagen Hydrogels: Experimental Results vs. Numerical Simulation With Custom and Commercial Finite Element Solvers
title_sort poroelastic modeling of highly hydrated collagen hydrogels: experimental results vs. numerical simulation with custom and commercial finite element solvers
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00142
work_keys_str_mv AT castroandrepg poroelasticmodelingofhighlyhydratedcollagenhydrogelsexperimentalresultsvsnumericalsimulationwithcustomandcommercialfiniteelementsolvers
AT yaojiang poroelasticmodelingofhighlyhydratedcollagenhydrogelsexperimentalresultsvsnumericalsimulationwithcustomandcommercialfiniteelementsolvers
AT battistitom poroelasticmodelingofhighlyhydratedcollagenhydrogelsexperimentalresultsvsnumericalsimulationwithcustomandcommercialfiniteelementsolvers
AT lacroixdamien poroelasticmodelingofhighlyhydratedcollagenhydrogelsexperimentalresultsvsnumericalsimulationwithcustomandcommercialfiniteelementsolvers