Cargando…

Attention Bias Test Differentiates Anxiety and Depression in Sheep

Negative affective states such as anxiety and depression pose a risk to animal welfare, however, practical tests for assessing these states in animals are limited. In humans, anxious individuals are shown to pay more attention toward threatening information than non-anxious individuals, known as an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monk, Jessica E., Belson, Sue, Colditz, Ian G., Lee, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405371
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00246
_version_ 1783366273642528768
author Monk, Jessica E.
Belson, Sue
Colditz, Ian G.
Lee, Caroline
author_facet Monk, Jessica E.
Belson, Sue
Colditz, Ian G.
Lee, Caroline
author_sort Monk, Jessica E.
collection PubMed
description Negative affective states such as anxiety and depression pose a risk to animal welfare, however, practical tests for assessing these states in animals are limited. In humans, anxious individuals are shown to pay more attention toward threatening information than non-anxious individuals, known as an attention bias. Previously, an attention bias test was developed and validated as a measure of anxious states in sheep, where more anxious sheep showed increased attention toward a threat (dog) and were more vigilant than Control animals. Studies in humans suggest that attention biases also occur in depressed individuals, with observations of attention biases toward threats, as well as biases away from positive stimuli. Given these findings, we hypothesized that an attention bias test for sheep could also be used to assess states of depression. We predicted that Merino ewes in pharmacologically induced Depressed (para-chlorophenylalanine) and Anxious (m-chlorophenylpiperazine) states would show greater attention toward a threat than Control animals (saline), but that the Depressed sheep would show relatively less interest in a positive stimulus (photograph of a conspecific). During testing, Depressed sheep paid more attention toward the threat and less toward the photograph than Control animals as predicted (Analyses of Variance, P < 0.05, n = 16 per treatment). Interestingly, Anxious sheep showed an attention bias in the opposite direction, paying more attention toward the photograph and less toward the threat than Control animals (P < 0.05). Both Anxious and Depressed sheep were more vigilant than Control animals (P = 0.002). These results suggest the attention bias test can be used to measure and differentiate states of depression and anxiety in livestock. The bidirectional nature of the attention bias identified between treatments highlights the importance of measuring multiple behaviors in the test and considering the context in which the test is applied. This will enable a clearer characterization of the affective state of an animal, as an aspect of its welfare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6205987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62059872018-11-07 Attention Bias Test Differentiates Anxiety and Depression in Sheep Monk, Jessica E. Belson, Sue Colditz, Ian G. Lee, Caroline Front Behav Neurosci Behavioral Neuroscience Negative affective states such as anxiety and depression pose a risk to animal welfare, however, practical tests for assessing these states in animals are limited. In humans, anxious individuals are shown to pay more attention toward threatening information than non-anxious individuals, known as an attention bias. Previously, an attention bias test was developed and validated as a measure of anxious states in sheep, where more anxious sheep showed increased attention toward a threat (dog) and were more vigilant than Control animals. Studies in humans suggest that attention biases also occur in depressed individuals, with observations of attention biases toward threats, as well as biases away from positive stimuli. Given these findings, we hypothesized that an attention bias test for sheep could also be used to assess states of depression. We predicted that Merino ewes in pharmacologically induced Depressed (para-chlorophenylalanine) and Anxious (m-chlorophenylpiperazine) states would show greater attention toward a threat than Control animals (saline), but that the Depressed sheep would show relatively less interest in a positive stimulus (photograph of a conspecific). During testing, Depressed sheep paid more attention toward the threat and less toward the photograph than Control animals as predicted (Analyses of Variance, P < 0.05, n = 16 per treatment). Interestingly, Anxious sheep showed an attention bias in the opposite direction, paying more attention toward the photograph and less toward the threat than Control animals (P < 0.05). Both Anxious and Depressed sheep were more vigilant than Control animals (P = 0.002). These results suggest the attention bias test can be used to measure and differentiate states of depression and anxiety in livestock. The bidirectional nature of the attention bias identified between treatments highlights the importance of measuring multiple behaviors in the test and considering the context in which the test is applied. This will enable a clearer characterization of the affective state of an animal, as an aspect of its welfare. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6205987/ /pubmed/30405371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00246 Text en Copyright © 2018 Monk, Belson, Colditz and Lee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Behavioral Neuroscience
Monk, Jessica E.
Belson, Sue
Colditz, Ian G.
Lee, Caroline
Attention Bias Test Differentiates Anxiety and Depression in Sheep
title Attention Bias Test Differentiates Anxiety and Depression in Sheep
title_full Attention Bias Test Differentiates Anxiety and Depression in Sheep
title_fullStr Attention Bias Test Differentiates Anxiety and Depression in Sheep
title_full_unstemmed Attention Bias Test Differentiates Anxiety and Depression in Sheep
title_short Attention Bias Test Differentiates Anxiety and Depression in Sheep
title_sort attention bias test differentiates anxiety and depression in sheep
topic Behavioral Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405371
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00246
work_keys_str_mv AT monkjessicae attentionbiastestdifferentiatesanxietyanddepressioninsheep
AT belsonsue attentionbiastestdifferentiatesanxietyanddepressioninsheep
AT colditziang attentionbiastestdifferentiatesanxietyanddepressioninsheep
AT leecaroline attentionbiastestdifferentiatesanxietyanddepressioninsheep