Cargando…
How to quantify animal activity from radio‐frequency identification (RFID) recordings
Automated animal monitoring via radio‐frequency identification (RFID) technology allows efficient and extensive data sampling of individual activity levels and is therefore commonly used for ecological research. However, processing RFID data is still a largely unresolved problem, which potentially l...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30397456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4491 |
_version_ | 1783366330142949376 |
---|---|
author | Iserbyt, Arne Griffioen, Maaike Borremans, Benny Eens, Marcel Müller, Wendt |
author_facet | Iserbyt, Arne Griffioen, Maaike Borremans, Benny Eens, Marcel Müller, Wendt |
author_sort | Iserbyt, Arne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Automated animal monitoring via radio‐frequency identification (RFID) technology allows efficient and extensive data sampling of individual activity levels and is therefore commonly used for ecological research. However, processing RFID data is still a largely unresolved problem, which potentially leads to inaccurate estimates for behavioral activity. One of the major challenges during data processing is to isolate independent behavioral actions from a set of superfluous, nonindependent detections. As a case study, individual blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) were simultaneously monitored during reproduction with both video recordings and RFID technology. We demonstrated how RFID data can be processed based on the time spent in‐ and outside a nest box. We then validated the number and timing of nest visits obtained from the processed RFID dataset by calibration against video recordings. The video observations revealed a limited overlap between the time spent in‐ and outside the nest box, with the least overlap at 23 s for both sexes. We then isolated exact arrival times from redundant RFID registrations by erasing all successive registrations within 23 s after the preceding registration. After aligning the processed RFID data with the corresponding video recordings, we observed a high accuracy in three behavioral estimates of parental care (individual nest visit rates, within‐pair alternation and synchronization of nest visits). We provide a clear guideline for future studies that aim to implement RFID technology in their research. We argue that our suggested RFID data processing procedure improves the precision of behavioral estimates, despite some inevitable drawbacks inherent to the technology. Our method is useful, not only for other cavity breeding birds, but for a wide range of (in)vertebrate species that are large enough to be fitted with a tag and that regularly pass near or through a fixed antenna. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6206221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62062212018-11-05 How to quantify animal activity from radio‐frequency identification (RFID) recordings Iserbyt, Arne Griffioen, Maaike Borremans, Benny Eens, Marcel Müller, Wendt Ecol Evol Original Research Automated animal monitoring via radio‐frequency identification (RFID) technology allows efficient and extensive data sampling of individual activity levels and is therefore commonly used for ecological research. However, processing RFID data is still a largely unresolved problem, which potentially leads to inaccurate estimates for behavioral activity. One of the major challenges during data processing is to isolate independent behavioral actions from a set of superfluous, nonindependent detections. As a case study, individual blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) were simultaneously monitored during reproduction with both video recordings and RFID technology. We demonstrated how RFID data can be processed based on the time spent in‐ and outside a nest box. We then validated the number and timing of nest visits obtained from the processed RFID dataset by calibration against video recordings. The video observations revealed a limited overlap between the time spent in‐ and outside the nest box, with the least overlap at 23 s for both sexes. We then isolated exact arrival times from redundant RFID registrations by erasing all successive registrations within 23 s after the preceding registration. After aligning the processed RFID data with the corresponding video recordings, we observed a high accuracy in three behavioral estimates of parental care (individual nest visit rates, within‐pair alternation and synchronization of nest visits). We provide a clear guideline for future studies that aim to implement RFID technology in their research. We argue that our suggested RFID data processing procedure improves the precision of behavioral estimates, despite some inevitable drawbacks inherent to the technology. Our method is useful, not only for other cavity breeding birds, but for a wide range of (in)vertebrate species that are large enough to be fitted with a tag and that regularly pass near or through a fixed antenna. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6206221/ /pubmed/30397456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4491 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Iserbyt, Arne Griffioen, Maaike Borremans, Benny Eens, Marcel Müller, Wendt How to quantify animal activity from radio‐frequency identification (RFID) recordings |
title | How to quantify animal activity from radio‐frequency identification (RFID) recordings |
title_full | How to quantify animal activity from radio‐frequency identification (RFID) recordings |
title_fullStr | How to quantify animal activity from radio‐frequency identification (RFID) recordings |
title_full_unstemmed | How to quantify animal activity from radio‐frequency identification (RFID) recordings |
title_short | How to quantify animal activity from radio‐frequency identification (RFID) recordings |
title_sort | how to quantify animal activity from radio‐frequency identification (rfid) recordings |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30397456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iserbytarne howtoquantifyanimalactivityfromradiofrequencyidentificationrfidrecordings AT griffioenmaaike howtoquantifyanimalactivityfromradiofrequencyidentificationrfidrecordings AT borremansbenny howtoquantifyanimalactivityfromradiofrequencyidentificationrfidrecordings AT eensmarcel howtoquantifyanimalactivityfromradiofrequencyidentificationrfidrecordings AT mullerwendt howtoquantifyanimalactivityfromradiofrequencyidentificationrfidrecordings |