Cargando…
Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models
In xenograft models, orthotopic (ORT) engraftment is thought to provide a different tumor microenvironment compared with subcutaneous (SC) engraftment. We attempted to characterize the biological difference between OE19 (adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction) SC and ORT models by pathologi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30393433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1293/tox.2018-0020 |
_version_ | 1783366342614712320 |
---|---|
author | Nakano, Kiyotaka Nishizawa, Takashi Komura, Daisuke Fujii, Etsuko Monnai, Makoto Kato, Atsuhiko Funahashi, Shin-ichi Ishikawa, Shumpei Suzuki, Masami |
author_facet | Nakano, Kiyotaka Nishizawa, Takashi Komura, Daisuke Fujii, Etsuko Monnai, Makoto Kato, Atsuhiko Funahashi, Shin-ichi Ishikawa, Shumpei Suzuki, Masami |
author_sort | Nakano, Kiyotaka |
collection | PubMed |
description | In xenograft models, orthotopic (ORT) engraftment is thought to provide a different tumor microenvironment compared with subcutaneous (SC) engraftment. We attempted to characterize the biological difference between OE19 (adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction) SC and ORT models by pathological analysis and CASTIN (CAncer-STromal INteractome) analysis, which is a novel method developed to analyze the tumor-stroma interactome framework. In SC models, SCID mice were inoculated subcutaneously with OE19 cells, and tumor tissues were sampled at 3 weeks. In ORT models, SCID mice were inoculated under the serosal membrane of the stomach wall, and tumor tissues were sampled at 3 and 6 weeks after engraftment. Results from the two models were then compared. Histopathologically, the SC tumors were well circumscribed from the adjacent tissue, with scant stroma and the formation of large ductal structures. In contrast, the ORT tumors were less circumscribed, with small ductal structures invading into abundant stroma. Then we compared the transcriptome profiles of human tumor cells with the mouse stromal cells of each model by species-specific RNA sequencing. With CASTIN analysis, we successfully identified several interactions that are known to affect the tumor microenvironment as being selectively enhanced in the ORT model. In conclusion, pathological analysis and CASTIN analysis revealed that ORT models of OE19 cells have a more invasive character and enhanced interaction with stromal cells compared with SC models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6206286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62062862018-11-02 Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models Nakano, Kiyotaka Nishizawa, Takashi Komura, Daisuke Fujii, Etsuko Monnai, Makoto Kato, Atsuhiko Funahashi, Shin-ichi Ishikawa, Shumpei Suzuki, Masami J Toxicol Pathol Original Article In xenograft models, orthotopic (ORT) engraftment is thought to provide a different tumor microenvironment compared with subcutaneous (SC) engraftment. We attempted to characterize the biological difference between OE19 (adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction) SC and ORT models by pathological analysis and CASTIN (CAncer-STromal INteractome) analysis, which is a novel method developed to analyze the tumor-stroma interactome framework. In SC models, SCID mice were inoculated subcutaneously with OE19 cells, and tumor tissues were sampled at 3 weeks. In ORT models, SCID mice were inoculated under the serosal membrane of the stomach wall, and tumor tissues were sampled at 3 and 6 weeks after engraftment. Results from the two models were then compared. Histopathologically, the SC tumors were well circumscribed from the adjacent tissue, with scant stroma and the formation of large ductal structures. In contrast, the ORT tumors were less circumscribed, with small ductal structures invading into abundant stroma. Then we compared the transcriptome profiles of human tumor cells with the mouse stromal cells of each model by species-specific RNA sequencing. With CASTIN analysis, we successfully identified several interactions that are known to affect the tumor microenvironment as being selectively enhanced in the ORT model. In conclusion, pathological analysis and CASTIN analysis revealed that ORT models of OE19 cells have a more invasive character and enhanced interaction with stromal cells compared with SC models. Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology 2018-08-13 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6206286/ /pubmed/30393433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1293/tox.2018-0020 Text en ©2018 The Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nakano, Kiyotaka Nishizawa, Takashi Komura, Daisuke Fujii, Etsuko Monnai, Makoto Kato, Atsuhiko Funahashi, Shin-ichi Ishikawa, Shumpei Suzuki, Masami Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models |
title | Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and
subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models |
title_full | Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and
subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models |
title_fullStr | Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and
subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models |
title_full_unstemmed | Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and
subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models |
title_short | Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and
subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models |
title_sort | difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and
subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30393433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1293/tox.2018-0020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakanokiyotaka differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels AT nishizawatakashi differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels AT komuradaisuke differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels AT fujiietsuko differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels AT monnaimakoto differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels AT katoatsuhiko differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels AT funahashishinichi differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels AT ishikawashumpei differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels AT suzukimasami differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels |