Cargando…

Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models

In xenograft models, orthotopic (ORT) engraftment is thought to provide a different tumor microenvironment compared with subcutaneous (SC) engraftment. We attempted to characterize the biological difference between OE19 (adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction) SC and ORT models by pathologi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakano, Kiyotaka, Nishizawa, Takashi, Komura, Daisuke, Fujii, Etsuko, Monnai, Makoto, Kato, Atsuhiko, Funahashi, Shin-ichi, Ishikawa, Shumpei, Suzuki, Masami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30393433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1293/tox.2018-0020
_version_ 1783366342614712320
author Nakano, Kiyotaka
Nishizawa, Takashi
Komura, Daisuke
Fujii, Etsuko
Monnai, Makoto
Kato, Atsuhiko
Funahashi, Shin-ichi
Ishikawa, Shumpei
Suzuki, Masami
author_facet Nakano, Kiyotaka
Nishizawa, Takashi
Komura, Daisuke
Fujii, Etsuko
Monnai, Makoto
Kato, Atsuhiko
Funahashi, Shin-ichi
Ishikawa, Shumpei
Suzuki, Masami
author_sort Nakano, Kiyotaka
collection PubMed
description In xenograft models, orthotopic (ORT) engraftment is thought to provide a different tumor microenvironment compared with subcutaneous (SC) engraftment. We attempted to characterize the biological difference between OE19 (adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction) SC and ORT models by pathological analysis and CASTIN (CAncer-STromal INteractome) analysis, which is a novel method developed to analyze the tumor-stroma interactome framework. In SC models, SCID mice were inoculated subcutaneously with OE19 cells, and tumor tissues were sampled at 3 weeks. In ORT models, SCID mice were inoculated under the serosal membrane of the stomach wall, and tumor tissues were sampled at 3 and 6 weeks after engraftment. Results from the two models were then compared. Histopathologically, the SC tumors were well circumscribed from the adjacent tissue, with scant stroma and the formation of large ductal structures. In contrast, the ORT tumors were less circumscribed, with small ductal structures invading into abundant stroma. Then we compared the transcriptome profiles of human tumor cells with the mouse stromal cells of each model by species-specific RNA sequencing. With CASTIN analysis, we successfully identified several interactions that are known to affect the tumor microenvironment as being selectively enhanced in the ORT model. In conclusion, pathological analysis and CASTIN analysis revealed that ORT models of OE19 cells have a more invasive character and enhanced interaction with stromal cells compared with SC models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6206286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62062862018-11-02 Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models Nakano, Kiyotaka Nishizawa, Takashi Komura, Daisuke Fujii, Etsuko Monnai, Makoto Kato, Atsuhiko Funahashi, Shin-ichi Ishikawa, Shumpei Suzuki, Masami J Toxicol Pathol Original Article In xenograft models, orthotopic (ORT) engraftment is thought to provide a different tumor microenvironment compared with subcutaneous (SC) engraftment. We attempted to characterize the biological difference between OE19 (adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction) SC and ORT models by pathological analysis and CASTIN (CAncer-STromal INteractome) analysis, which is a novel method developed to analyze the tumor-stroma interactome framework. In SC models, SCID mice were inoculated subcutaneously with OE19 cells, and tumor tissues were sampled at 3 weeks. In ORT models, SCID mice were inoculated under the serosal membrane of the stomach wall, and tumor tissues were sampled at 3 and 6 weeks after engraftment. Results from the two models were then compared. Histopathologically, the SC tumors were well circumscribed from the adjacent tissue, with scant stroma and the formation of large ductal structures. In contrast, the ORT tumors were less circumscribed, with small ductal structures invading into abundant stroma. Then we compared the transcriptome profiles of human tumor cells with the mouse stromal cells of each model by species-specific RNA sequencing. With CASTIN analysis, we successfully identified several interactions that are known to affect the tumor microenvironment as being selectively enhanced in the ORT model. In conclusion, pathological analysis and CASTIN analysis revealed that ORT models of OE19 cells have a more invasive character and enhanced interaction with stromal cells compared with SC models. Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology 2018-08-13 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6206286/ /pubmed/30393433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1293/tox.2018-0020 Text en ©2018 The Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nakano, Kiyotaka
Nishizawa, Takashi
Komura, Daisuke
Fujii, Etsuko
Monnai, Makoto
Kato, Atsuhiko
Funahashi, Shin-ichi
Ishikawa, Shumpei
Suzuki, Masami
Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models
title Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models
title_full Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models
title_fullStr Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models
title_full_unstemmed Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models
title_short Difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models
title_sort difference in morphology and interactome profiles between orthotopic and subcutaneous gastric cancer xenograft models
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30393433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1293/tox.2018-0020
work_keys_str_mv AT nakanokiyotaka differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels
AT nishizawatakashi differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels
AT komuradaisuke differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels
AT fujiietsuko differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels
AT monnaimakoto differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels
AT katoatsuhiko differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels
AT funahashishinichi differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels
AT ishikawashumpei differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels
AT suzukimasami differenceinmorphologyandinteractomeprofilesbetweenorthotopicandsubcutaneousgastriccancerxenograftmodels