Cargando…
Routine MRCP in the management of patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience
OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency of choledocolithiasis and the role of preoperative laboratory findings, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of choledocolithiasis in patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy. METHODS: A consecut...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29978345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0640-3 |
_version_ | 1783366356734836736 |
---|---|
author | Virzì, Valentina Ognibene, Noemi Maria Giovanna Sciortino, Antonio Salvatore Culmone, Glenda Virzì, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Virzì, Valentina Ognibene, Noemi Maria Giovanna Sciortino, Antonio Salvatore Culmone, Glenda Virzì, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Virzì, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency of choledocolithiasis and the role of preoperative laboratory findings, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of choledocolithiasis in patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 104 patients underwent MRCP prior to cholecystectomy. The patients were classified into different groups on the basis of the risk of choledocolithiasis. A specialised doctor with more 10 years of experience performed the US interpretation and a radiologist performed the MRCP interpretation blinded to US or aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/alkaline phosphatase (ALP) results. A chi-square (χ(2)) test was performed to assess the statistical significance of differences in the frequency of choledocolithiasis based on laboratory findings, choledocal diameter on US and group risk. RESULTS: MRCP showed calculi in 7 out of 104 patients (6.7%), with no statistically significant differences between the high/moderate risk and low/no risk groups and between the patients with normal and altered laboratory findings or choledocal diameter on preoperative US. The sensitivity and specificity of AST/ALT [positive predictive value (PPV): 12%; negative predictive value (NPV): 94%], ALP (PPV: 7%; NPV: 94%), total serum bilirubin (PPV: 6%; NPV: 93%) and choledocal diameter (PPV: 20%; NPV: 94%) were, respectively, 28.6 and 94.8%, 85.7 and 17.5%, 14.3 and 93.8%, and 14.3 and 95.9%. CONCLUSIONS: MRCP is a reliable evaluation for the detection of common bile duct (CBD) stones, reducing the misdiagnosis of retained choledocholithiasis with normal biochemical predictors and US examination. MAIN MESSAGES: • MRCP is a non-invasive method for the detection of CBD stones. • Preoperative MRCP reduces the misdiagnosis of retained choledocholithiasis. • Detection of choledocholithiasis is mandatory prior to cholecystectomy to avoid surgical morbidity |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6206385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62063852018-11-06 Routine MRCP in the management of patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience Virzì, Valentina Ognibene, Noemi Maria Giovanna Sciortino, Antonio Salvatore Culmone, Glenda Virzì, Giuseppe Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency of choledocolithiasis and the role of preoperative laboratory findings, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of choledocolithiasis in patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 104 patients underwent MRCP prior to cholecystectomy. The patients were classified into different groups on the basis of the risk of choledocolithiasis. A specialised doctor with more 10 years of experience performed the US interpretation and a radiologist performed the MRCP interpretation blinded to US or aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/alkaline phosphatase (ALP) results. A chi-square (χ(2)) test was performed to assess the statistical significance of differences in the frequency of choledocolithiasis based on laboratory findings, choledocal diameter on US and group risk. RESULTS: MRCP showed calculi in 7 out of 104 patients (6.7%), with no statistically significant differences between the high/moderate risk and low/no risk groups and between the patients with normal and altered laboratory findings or choledocal diameter on preoperative US. The sensitivity and specificity of AST/ALT [positive predictive value (PPV): 12%; negative predictive value (NPV): 94%], ALP (PPV: 7%; NPV: 94%), total serum bilirubin (PPV: 6%; NPV: 93%) and choledocal diameter (PPV: 20%; NPV: 94%) were, respectively, 28.6 and 94.8%, 85.7 and 17.5%, 14.3 and 93.8%, and 14.3 and 95.9%. CONCLUSIONS: MRCP is a reliable evaluation for the detection of common bile duct (CBD) stones, reducing the misdiagnosis of retained choledocholithiasis with normal biochemical predictors and US examination. MAIN MESSAGES: • MRCP is a non-invasive method for the detection of CBD stones. • Preoperative MRCP reduces the misdiagnosis of retained choledocholithiasis. • Detection of choledocholithiasis is mandatory prior to cholecystectomy to avoid surgical morbidity Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6206385/ /pubmed/29978345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0640-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Virzì, Valentina Ognibene, Noemi Maria Giovanna Sciortino, Antonio Salvatore Culmone, Glenda Virzì, Giuseppe Routine MRCP in the management of patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience |
title | Routine MRCP in the management of patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience |
title_full | Routine MRCP in the management of patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience |
title_fullStr | Routine MRCP in the management of patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Routine MRCP in the management of patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience |
title_short | Routine MRCP in the management of patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience |
title_sort | routine mrcp in the management of patients with gallbladder stones awaiting cholecystectomy: a single-centre experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29978345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0640-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT virzivalentina routinemrcpinthemanagementofpatientswithgallbladderstonesawaitingcholecystectomyasinglecentreexperience AT ognibenenoemimariagiovanna routinemrcpinthemanagementofpatientswithgallbladderstonesawaitingcholecystectomyasinglecentreexperience AT sciortinoantoniosalvatore routinemrcpinthemanagementofpatientswithgallbladderstonesawaitingcholecystectomyasinglecentreexperience AT culmoneglenda routinemrcpinthemanagementofpatientswithgallbladderstonesawaitingcholecystectomyasinglecentreexperience AT virzigiuseppe routinemrcpinthemanagementofpatientswithgallbladderstonesawaitingcholecystectomyasinglecentreexperience |