Cargando…

Comparison of Elution Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Biantibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement for Spacers: Copal® Spacem with Gentamicin and Vancomycin versus Palacos® R+G with Vancomycin

PURPOSE: Copal® spacem is a new PMMA bone cement for fabricating spacers. This study compares elution of gentamicin, elution of vancomycin, and compressive strength of Copal® spacem and of Palacos® R+G at different vancomycin loadings in the powder of the cements. We hypothesized that antibiotic elu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boelch, Sebastian P., Rueckl, Kilian, Fuchs, Clara, Jordan, Martin, Knauer, Markus, Steinert, Andre, Rudert, Maximilian, Luedemann, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4323518
_version_ 1783366367394660352
author Boelch, Sebastian P.
Rueckl, Kilian
Fuchs, Clara
Jordan, Martin
Knauer, Markus
Steinert, Andre
Rudert, Maximilian
Luedemann, Martin
author_facet Boelch, Sebastian P.
Rueckl, Kilian
Fuchs, Clara
Jordan, Martin
Knauer, Markus
Steinert, Andre
Rudert, Maximilian
Luedemann, Martin
author_sort Boelch, Sebastian P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Copal® spacem is a new PMMA bone cement for fabricating spacers. This study compares elution of gentamicin, elution of vancomycin, and compressive strength of Copal® spacem and of Palacos® R+G at different vancomycin loadings in the powder of the cements. We hypothesized that antibiotic elution of Copal® spacem is superior at comparable compressive strength. METHODS: Compression test specimens were fabricated using Copal® spacem manually loaded with 0.5 g gentamicin and additionally 2 g, 4 g, and 6 g of vancomycin per 40 g of cement powder (COP specimens) and using 0.5 g gentamicin premixed Palacos® R+G manually loaded with 2 g, 4 g, and 6 g of vancomycin per 40 g of cement powder (PAL specimens). These specimens were used for determination of gentamicin and vancomycin elution (in fetal calf serum, at 22°C) and for determination of compressive strength both prior and following the elution tests. RESULTS: Cumulative gentamicin concentrations (p < 0.005) and gentamicin concentration after 28 days (p ≤ 0.043) were significantly lower for COP specimens compared to PAL specimens. Cumulative vancomycin concentrations were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.043) for COP specimens after the second day. Vancomycin concentrations after 28 days were not significantly higher for the Copal specimens loaded with 2 g and 4 g of vancomycin. Compressive strength was not significantly different between COP specimens and PAL specimens before elution tests. Compressive strength after the elution tests was significantly lower (p = 0.005) for COP specimens loaded with 2 g of vancomycin. CONCLUSION: We could not demonstrate consistent superior antibiotic elution from Copal® spacem compared to Palacos® R+G for fabricating gentamicin and vancomycin loaded spacers. The results do not favor Copal® spacem over Palacos® R+G for the use as a gentamicin and vancomycin biantibiotic-loaded spacer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6206524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62065242018-11-08 Comparison of Elution Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Biantibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement for Spacers: Copal® Spacem with Gentamicin and Vancomycin versus Palacos® R+G with Vancomycin Boelch, Sebastian P. Rueckl, Kilian Fuchs, Clara Jordan, Martin Knauer, Markus Steinert, Andre Rudert, Maximilian Luedemann, Martin Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: Copal® spacem is a new PMMA bone cement for fabricating spacers. This study compares elution of gentamicin, elution of vancomycin, and compressive strength of Copal® spacem and of Palacos® R+G at different vancomycin loadings in the powder of the cements. We hypothesized that antibiotic elution of Copal® spacem is superior at comparable compressive strength. METHODS: Compression test specimens were fabricated using Copal® spacem manually loaded with 0.5 g gentamicin and additionally 2 g, 4 g, and 6 g of vancomycin per 40 g of cement powder (COP specimens) and using 0.5 g gentamicin premixed Palacos® R+G manually loaded with 2 g, 4 g, and 6 g of vancomycin per 40 g of cement powder (PAL specimens). These specimens were used for determination of gentamicin and vancomycin elution (in fetal calf serum, at 22°C) and for determination of compressive strength both prior and following the elution tests. RESULTS: Cumulative gentamicin concentrations (p < 0.005) and gentamicin concentration after 28 days (p ≤ 0.043) were significantly lower for COP specimens compared to PAL specimens. Cumulative vancomycin concentrations were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.043) for COP specimens after the second day. Vancomycin concentrations after 28 days were not significantly higher for the Copal specimens loaded with 2 g and 4 g of vancomycin. Compressive strength was not significantly different between COP specimens and PAL specimens before elution tests. Compressive strength after the elution tests was significantly lower (p = 0.005) for COP specimens loaded with 2 g of vancomycin. CONCLUSION: We could not demonstrate consistent superior antibiotic elution from Copal® spacem compared to Palacos® R+G for fabricating gentamicin and vancomycin loaded spacers. The results do not favor Copal® spacem over Palacos® R+G for the use as a gentamicin and vancomycin biantibiotic-loaded spacer. Hindawi 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6206524/ /pubmed/30410931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4323518 Text en Copyright © 2018 Sebastian P. Boelch et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boelch, Sebastian P.
Rueckl, Kilian
Fuchs, Clara
Jordan, Martin
Knauer, Markus
Steinert, Andre
Rudert, Maximilian
Luedemann, Martin
Comparison of Elution Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Biantibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement for Spacers: Copal® Spacem with Gentamicin and Vancomycin versus Palacos® R+G with Vancomycin
title Comparison of Elution Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Biantibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement for Spacers: Copal® Spacem with Gentamicin and Vancomycin versus Palacos® R+G with Vancomycin
title_full Comparison of Elution Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Biantibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement for Spacers: Copal® Spacem with Gentamicin and Vancomycin versus Palacos® R+G with Vancomycin
title_fullStr Comparison of Elution Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Biantibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement for Spacers: Copal® Spacem with Gentamicin and Vancomycin versus Palacos® R+G with Vancomycin
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Elution Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Biantibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement for Spacers: Copal® Spacem with Gentamicin and Vancomycin versus Palacos® R+G with Vancomycin
title_short Comparison of Elution Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Biantibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement for Spacers: Copal® Spacem with Gentamicin and Vancomycin versus Palacos® R+G with Vancomycin
title_sort comparison of elution characteristics and compressive strength of biantibiotic-loaded pmma bone cement for spacers: copal® spacem with gentamicin and vancomycin versus palacos® r+g with vancomycin
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4323518
work_keys_str_mv AT boelchsebastianp comparisonofelutioncharacteristicsandcompressivestrengthofbiantibioticloadedpmmabonecementforspacerscopalspacemwithgentamicinandvancomycinversuspalacosrgwithvancomycin
AT ruecklkilian comparisonofelutioncharacteristicsandcompressivestrengthofbiantibioticloadedpmmabonecementforspacerscopalspacemwithgentamicinandvancomycinversuspalacosrgwithvancomycin
AT fuchsclara comparisonofelutioncharacteristicsandcompressivestrengthofbiantibioticloadedpmmabonecementforspacerscopalspacemwithgentamicinandvancomycinversuspalacosrgwithvancomycin
AT jordanmartin comparisonofelutioncharacteristicsandcompressivestrengthofbiantibioticloadedpmmabonecementforspacerscopalspacemwithgentamicinandvancomycinversuspalacosrgwithvancomycin
AT knauermarkus comparisonofelutioncharacteristicsandcompressivestrengthofbiantibioticloadedpmmabonecementforspacerscopalspacemwithgentamicinandvancomycinversuspalacosrgwithvancomycin
AT steinertandre comparisonofelutioncharacteristicsandcompressivestrengthofbiantibioticloadedpmmabonecementforspacerscopalspacemwithgentamicinandvancomycinversuspalacosrgwithvancomycin
AT rudertmaximilian comparisonofelutioncharacteristicsandcompressivestrengthofbiantibioticloadedpmmabonecementforspacerscopalspacemwithgentamicinandvancomycinversuspalacosrgwithvancomycin
AT luedemannmartin comparisonofelutioncharacteristicsandcompressivestrengthofbiantibioticloadedpmmabonecementforspacerscopalspacemwithgentamicinandvancomycinversuspalacosrgwithvancomycin