Cargando…

Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders

AIM: To assess changes in the craniocervical structure and in hyoid bone position in skeletal Class II subjects with and without temporomandibular disorders (TMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cephalometric analysis of 59 subjects with skeletal Class II was evaluated and compared. The measurements con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Giacomo, Paola, Ferrara, Valeria, Accivile, Ettore, Ferrato, Giacomo, Polimeni, Antonella, Di Paolo, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4286796
_version_ 1783366369867202560
author Di Giacomo, Paola
Ferrara, Valeria
Accivile, Ettore
Ferrato, Giacomo
Polimeni, Antonella
Di Paolo, Carlo
author_facet Di Giacomo, Paola
Ferrara, Valeria
Accivile, Ettore
Ferrato, Giacomo
Polimeni, Antonella
Di Paolo, Carlo
author_sort Di Giacomo, Paola
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess changes in the craniocervical structure and in hyoid bone position in skeletal Class II subjects with and without temporomandibular disorders (TMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cephalometric analysis of 59 subjects with skeletal Class II was evaluated and compared. The measurements considered were ANB as a parameter of Class II and C0-C1 distance, C1-C2 distance, craniocervical angle, and hyoid bone position for the cervical spine analysis. Patients were divided into patients with TMD (group A) and patients without TMD (group B). TMD were evaluated with Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). Descriptive statistics and Pearson's and Spearman's correlation analysis, with p value <0,005, were performed. RESULTS: C0-C1 and C1-C2 distance values and hyoid bone position resulted within the normal range in the majority of patients examined. Craniocervical angle was altered in 33 patients. The reduction of this angle with the increase of the ANB value resulted to be statistically significant in group A, according to Pearson's correlation index. No other data were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The significant relationship between skeletal Class II and cervical spine cannot be highlighted. The alteration of craniocervical angle seems to be mildly present, with backward counterclockwise rotation of the head upon the neck in the sample (groups A and B). The presence of TMD as a key factor of changes in neck posture could explain the different result between the two groups about the relationship between ANB and craniocervical angle. This result should be further analyzed in order to better understand if cervical spine changes could be related to mandibular postural ones in the craniocervical space or to temporomandibular joint retropositioning, more recognizable in Class II with TMD, which could determine functional changes in other structures of this unit; neck posture could be the result of a compensatory/antalgic mechanism in response to TMD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6206553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62065532018-11-08 Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders Di Giacomo, Paola Ferrara, Valeria Accivile, Ettore Ferrato, Giacomo Polimeni, Antonella Di Paolo, Carlo Pain Res Manag Research Article AIM: To assess changes in the craniocervical structure and in hyoid bone position in skeletal Class II subjects with and without temporomandibular disorders (TMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cephalometric analysis of 59 subjects with skeletal Class II was evaluated and compared. The measurements considered were ANB as a parameter of Class II and C0-C1 distance, C1-C2 distance, craniocervical angle, and hyoid bone position for the cervical spine analysis. Patients were divided into patients with TMD (group A) and patients without TMD (group B). TMD were evaluated with Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (DC/TMD). Descriptive statistics and Pearson's and Spearman's correlation analysis, with p value <0,005, were performed. RESULTS: C0-C1 and C1-C2 distance values and hyoid bone position resulted within the normal range in the majority of patients examined. Craniocervical angle was altered in 33 patients. The reduction of this angle with the increase of the ANB value resulted to be statistically significant in group A, according to Pearson's correlation index. No other data were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The significant relationship between skeletal Class II and cervical spine cannot be highlighted. The alteration of craniocervical angle seems to be mildly present, with backward counterclockwise rotation of the head upon the neck in the sample (groups A and B). The presence of TMD as a key factor of changes in neck posture could explain the different result between the two groups about the relationship between ANB and craniocervical angle. This result should be further analyzed in order to better understand if cervical spine changes could be related to mandibular postural ones in the craniocervical space or to temporomandibular joint retropositioning, more recognizable in Class II with TMD, which could determine functional changes in other structures of this unit; neck posture could be the result of a compensatory/antalgic mechanism in response to TMD. Hindawi 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6206553/ /pubmed/30410638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4286796 Text en Copyright © 2018 Paola Di Giacomo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Di Giacomo, Paola
Ferrara, Valeria
Accivile, Ettore
Ferrato, Giacomo
Polimeni, Antonella
Di Paolo, Carlo
Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders
title Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders
title_full Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders
title_fullStr Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders
title_short Relationship between Cervical Spine and Skeletal Class II in Subjects with and without Temporomandibular Disorders
title_sort relationship between cervical spine and skeletal class ii in subjects with and without temporomandibular disorders
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4286796
work_keys_str_mv AT digiacomopaola relationshipbetweencervicalspineandskeletalclassiiinsubjectswithandwithouttemporomandibulardisorders
AT ferraravaleria relationshipbetweencervicalspineandskeletalclassiiinsubjectswithandwithouttemporomandibulardisorders
AT accivileettore relationshipbetweencervicalspineandskeletalclassiiinsubjectswithandwithouttemporomandibulardisorders
AT ferratogiacomo relationshipbetweencervicalspineandskeletalclassiiinsubjectswithandwithouttemporomandibulardisorders
AT polimeniantonella relationshipbetweencervicalspineandskeletalclassiiinsubjectswithandwithouttemporomandibulardisorders
AT dipaolocarlo relationshipbetweencervicalspineandskeletalclassiiinsubjectswithandwithouttemporomandibulardisorders