Cargando…

Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo—A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study

INTRODUCTION: Peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) seems to be more pronounced in the first year of loading despite all the studies and changes implemented to reduce it. Among the different causes, the presence of a microgap makes the interface between fixture and abutment colonizable by bacteria,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinjari, Bruna, D'Addazio, Gianmaria, De Tullio, Ilaria, Traini, Tonino, Caputi, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5326340
_version_ 1783366374346719232
author Sinjari, Bruna
D'Addazio, Gianmaria
De Tullio, Ilaria
Traini, Tonino
Caputi, Sergio
author_facet Sinjari, Bruna
D'Addazio, Gianmaria
De Tullio, Ilaria
Traini, Tonino
Caputi, Sergio
author_sort Sinjari, Bruna
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) seems to be more pronounced in the first year of loading despite all the studies and changes implemented to reduce it. Among the different causes, the presence of a microgap makes the interface between fixture and abutment colonizable by bacteria, causing an inflammatory response and consequent bone resorption. To reduce this several local antiseptics like chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) were used after surgical procedures. AIM: The objective was to radiologically compare the MBL when a 0.20% CHX gel or a placebo gel was applied to the implant-abutment interface during all surgical and prosthetic phases and for a follow-up period up to 12 months. METHOD: 32 patients (16 for each Group A and B) were enrolled and rehabilitated with a single implant (Cortex classic, Cortex, Shalomi, Israel). During each of the clinical stages a gel containing 0.20% CHX (Plak ®Gel; Polifarma Wellness Srl, Rome, Italy) or a placebo gel (Placebo, Polifarma Wellness Srl, Rome, Italy) was used as indicated by the randomization chart. In order to compare radiographic modification intraoral radiographs was taken. Also, clinical data regarding implant or prosthetic failure and gingival index were recorded. Data were presented as means and standard deviations (SD) and used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: All implants showed no bleeding on probing and a very small plaque score at the 1 year of follow-up. MBL was statistically significantly different between the groups in every stage. CONCLUSION: Results obtained showed that the use of CHX gel inside the connection significantly reduces MBL during the first year. A rigid disinfection protocol with 0.20% CHX from the time of implant insertion to crown delivery is recommended to reduce host inflammatory response and consequently MBL. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: (Registration Number: NCT03431766).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6206572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62065722018-11-08 Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo—A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study Sinjari, Bruna D'Addazio, Gianmaria De Tullio, Ilaria Traini, Tonino Caputi, Sergio Biomed Res Int Clinical Study INTRODUCTION: Peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) seems to be more pronounced in the first year of loading despite all the studies and changes implemented to reduce it. Among the different causes, the presence of a microgap makes the interface between fixture and abutment colonizable by bacteria, causing an inflammatory response and consequent bone resorption. To reduce this several local antiseptics like chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) were used after surgical procedures. AIM: The objective was to radiologically compare the MBL when a 0.20% CHX gel or a placebo gel was applied to the implant-abutment interface during all surgical and prosthetic phases and for a follow-up period up to 12 months. METHOD: 32 patients (16 for each Group A and B) were enrolled and rehabilitated with a single implant (Cortex classic, Cortex, Shalomi, Israel). During each of the clinical stages a gel containing 0.20% CHX (Plak ®Gel; Polifarma Wellness Srl, Rome, Italy) or a placebo gel (Placebo, Polifarma Wellness Srl, Rome, Italy) was used as indicated by the randomization chart. In order to compare radiographic modification intraoral radiographs was taken. Also, clinical data regarding implant or prosthetic failure and gingival index were recorded. Data were presented as means and standard deviations (SD) and used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: All implants showed no bleeding on probing and a very small plaque score at the 1 year of follow-up. MBL was statistically significantly different between the groups in every stage. CONCLUSION: Results obtained showed that the use of CHX gel inside the connection significantly reduces MBL during the first year. A rigid disinfection protocol with 0.20% CHX from the time of implant insertion to crown delivery is recommended to reduce host inflammatory response and consequently MBL. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: (Registration Number: NCT03431766). Hindawi 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6206572/ /pubmed/30410934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5326340 Text en Copyright © 2018 Bruna Sinjari et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Sinjari, Bruna
D'Addazio, Gianmaria
De Tullio, Ilaria
Traini, Tonino
Caputi, Sergio
Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo—A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study
title Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo—A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study
title_full Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo—A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study
title_fullStr Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo—A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study
title_full_unstemmed Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo—A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study
title_short Peri-Implant Bone Resorption during Healing Abutment Placement: The Effect of a 0.20% Chlorhexidine Gel vs. Placebo—A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Human Study
title_sort peri-implant bone resorption during healing abutment placement: the effect of a 0.20% chlorhexidine gel vs. placebo—a randomized double blind controlled human study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5326340
work_keys_str_mv AT sinjaribruna periimplantboneresorptionduringhealingabutmentplacementtheeffectofa020chlorhexidinegelvsplaceboarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledhumanstudy
AT daddaziogianmaria periimplantboneresorptionduringhealingabutmentplacementtheeffectofa020chlorhexidinegelvsplaceboarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledhumanstudy
AT detullioilaria periimplantboneresorptionduringhealingabutmentplacementtheeffectofa020chlorhexidinegelvsplaceboarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledhumanstudy
AT trainitonino periimplantboneresorptionduringhealingabutmentplacementtheeffectofa020chlorhexidinegelvsplaceboarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledhumanstudy
AT caputisergio periimplantboneresorptionduringhealingabutmentplacementtheeffectofa020chlorhexidinegelvsplaceboarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledhumanstudy