Cargando…
A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV
OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes with single tablet regimens (STR) versus multi-tablet regimens (MTR) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment using published data. DESIGN: Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of literature on approved and investigational HIV regimens. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30373620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-018-0204-0 |
_version_ | 1783366392743985152 |
---|---|
author | Clay, Patrick G. Yuet, Wei C. Moecklinghoff, Christiane H. Duchesne, Inge Tronczyński, Krzysztof L. Shah, Sandip Shao, Dong |
author_facet | Clay, Patrick G. Yuet, Wei C. Moecklinghoff, Christiane H. Duchesne, Inge Tronczyński, Krzysztof L. Shah, Sandip Shao, Dong |
author_sort | Clay, Patrick G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes with single tablet regimens (STR) versus multi-tablet regimens (MTR) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment using published data. DESIGN: Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of literature on approved and investigational HIV regimens. METHODS: The research followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Single or un-blinded studies reporting a direct comparison between STR and MTR were eligible for the meta-analysis. Double-blinded studies were excluded due to lack of difference in pill burden between cohorts. The key outcomes of interest included: adherence rates/proportion meeting target, efficacy, safety/tolerability, non-clinical and economic outcomes. RESULTS: After screening 63 full-text articles and posters, 14 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. The analysis showed that patients taking STR had improved outcomes over those taking MTR. Patients were significantly more adherent regardless of daily dosing frequency (odds ratio [OR]: 1.96, p < 0.001) and were more likely to achieve virological suppression (relative risk [RR]: 1.05, p = 0.002). There was a trend toward a lower discontinuation risk in the STR cohort, together with reported higher therapy satisfaction, better symptom control, improved health status, reduced healthcare resource utilization and demonstrated cost-effectiveness compared to MTR. There were no differences in CD4 cell count increase (at 48 weeks) or safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study confirm previously reported preliminary findings of the advantages of STR over MTR for HIV treatment in adherence, therapy continuation, viral suppression, tolerability, quality of life improvement, cost-effectiveness and healthcare resource utilization. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12981-018-0204-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6206661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62066612018-10-31 A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV Clay, Patrick G. Yuet, Wei C. Moecklinghoff, Christiane H. Duchesne, Inge Tronczyński, Krzysztof L. Shah, Sandip Shao, Dong AIDS Res Ther Research OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes with single tablet regimens (STR) versus multi-tablet regimens (MTR) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment using published data. DESIGN: Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of literature on approved and investigational HIV regimens. METHODS: The research followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Single or un-blinded studies reporting a direct comparison between STR and MTR were eligible for the meta-analysis. Double-blinded studies were excluded due to lack of difference in pill burden between cohorts. The key outcomes of interest included: adherence rates/proportion meeting target, efficacy, safety/tolerability, non-clinical and economic outcomes. RESULTS: After screening 63 full-text articles and posters, 14 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. The analysis showed that patients taking STR had improved outcomes over those taking MTR. Patients were significantly more adherent regardless of daily dosing frequency (odds ratio [OR]: 1.96, p < 0.001) and were more likely to achieve virological suppression (relative risk [RR]: 1.05, p = 0.002). There was a trend toward a lower discontinuation risk in the STR cohort, together with reported higher therapy satisfaction, better symptom control, improved health status, reduced healthcare resource utilization and demonstrated cost-effectiveness compared to MTR. There were no differences in CD4 cell count increase (at 48 weeks) or safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study confirm previously reported preliminary findings of the advantages of STR over MTR for HIV treatment in adherence, therapy continuation, viral suppression, tolerability, quality of life improvement, cost-effectiveness and healthcare resource utilization. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12981-018-0204-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6206661/ /pubmed/30373620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-018-0204-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Clay, Patrick G. Yuet, Wei C. Moecklinghoff, Christiane H. Duchesne, Inge Tronczyński, Krzysztof L. Shah, Sandip Shao, Dong A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV |
title | A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV |
title_full | A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV |
title_fullStr | A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV |
title_short | A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV |
title_sort | meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with hiv |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30373620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-018-0204-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claypatrickg ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT yuetweic ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT moecklinghoffchristianeh ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT duchesneinge ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT tronczynskikrzysztofl ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT shahsandip ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT shaodong ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT claypatrickg metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT yuetweic metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT moecklinghoffchristianeh metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT duchesneinge metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT tronczynskikrzysztofl metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT shahsandip metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv AT shaodong metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv |