Cargando…

A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes with single tablet regimens (STR) versus multi-tablet regimens (MTR) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment using published data. DESIGN: Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of literature on approved and investigational HIV regimens. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clay, Patrick G., Yuet, Wei C., Moecklinghoff, Christiane H., Duchesne, Inge, Tronczyński, Krzysztof L., Shah, Sandip, Shao, Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30373620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-018-0204-0
_version_ 1783366392743985152
author Clay, Patrick G.
Yuet, Wei C.
Moecklinghoff, Christiane H.
Duchesne, Inge
Tronczyński, Krzysztof L.
Shah, Sandip
Shao, Dong
author_facet Clay, Patrick G.
Yuet, Wei C.
Moecklinghoff, Christiane H.
Duchesne, Inge
Tronczyński, Krzysztof L.
Shah, Sandip
Shao, Dong
author_sort Clay, Patrick G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes with single tablet regimens (STR) versus multi-tablet regimens (MTR) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment using published data. DESIGN: Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of literature on approved and investigational HIV regimens. METHODS: The research followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Single or un-blinded studies reporting a direct comparison between STR and MTR were eligible for the meta-analysis. Double-blinded studies were excluded due to lack of difference in pill burden between cohorts. The key outcomes of interest included: adherence rates/proportion meeting target, efficacy, safety/tolerability, non-clinical and economic outcomes. RESULTS: After screening 63 full-text articles and posters, 14 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. The analysis showed that patients taking STR had improved outcomes over those taking MTR. Patients were significantly more adherent regardless of daily dosing frequency (odds ratio [OR]: 1.96, p < 0.001) and were more likely to achieve virological suppression (relative risk [RR]: 1.05, p = 0.002). There was a trend toward a lower discontinuation risk in the STR cohort, together with reported higher therapy satisfaction, better symptom control, improved health status, reduced healthcare resource utilization and demonstrated cost-effectiveness compared to MTR. There were no differences in CD4 cell count increase (at 48 weeks) or safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study confirm previously reported preliminary findings of the advantages of STR over MTR for HIV treatment in adherence, therapy continuation, viral suppression, tolerability, quality of life improvement, cost-effectiveness and healthcare resource utilization. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12981-018-0204-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6206661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62066612018-10-31 A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV Clay, Patrick G. Yuet, Wei C. Moecklinghoff, Christiane H. Duchesne, Inge Tronczyński, Krzysztof L. Shah, Sandip Shao, Dong AIDS Res Ther Research OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes with single tablet regimens (STR) versus multi-tablet regimens (MTR) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment using published data. DESIGN: Systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of literature on approved and investigational HIV regimens. METHODS: The research followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Single or un-blinded studies reporting a direct comparison between STR and MTR were eligible for the meta-analysis. Double-blinded studies were excluded due to lack of difference in pill burden between cohorts. The key outcomes of interest included: adherence rates/proportion meeting target, efficacy, safety/tolerability, non-clinical and economic outcomes. RESULTS: After screening 63 full-text articles and posters, 14 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. The analysis showed that patients taking STR had improved outcomes over those taking MTR. Patients were significantly more adherent regardless of daily dosing frequency (odds ratio [OR]: 1.96, p < 0.001) and were more likely to achieve virological suppression (relative risk [RR]: 1.05, p = 0.002). There was a trend toward a lower discontinuation risk in the STR cohort, together with reported higher therapy satisfaction, better symptom control, improved health status, reduced healthcare resource utilization and demonstrated cost-effectiveness compared to MTR. There were no differences in CD4 cell count increase (at 48 weeks) or safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study confirm previously reported preliminary findings of the advantages of STR over MTR for HIV treatment in adherence, therapy continuation, viral suppression, tolerability, quality of life improvement, cost-effectiveness and healthcare resource utilization. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12981-018-0204-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6206661/ /pubmed/30373620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-018-0204-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Clay, Patrick G.
Yuet, Wei C.
Moecklinghoff, Christiane H.
Duchesne, Inge
Tronczyński, Krzysztof L.
Shah, Sandip
Shao, Dong
A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV
title A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV
title_full A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV
title_fullStr A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV
title_short A meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with HIV
title_sort meta-analysis comparing 48-week treatment outcomes of single and multi-tablet antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of people living with hiv
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30373620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12981-018-0204-0
work_keys_str_mv AT claypatrickg ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT yuetweic ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT moecklinghoffchristianeh ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT duchesneinge ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT tronczynskikrzysztofl ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT shahsandip ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT shaodong ametaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT claypatrickg metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT yuetweic metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT moecklinghoffchristianeh metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT duchesneinge metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT tronczynskikrzysztofl metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT shahsandip metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv
AT shaodong metaanalysiscomparing48weektreatmentoutcomesofsingleandmultitabletantiretroviralregimensforthetreatmentofpeoplelivingwithhiv