Cargando…

Comparing diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene promoter methylation panels in tissue biopsies and urines of prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers among men worldwide. Current screening methods for PCa display limited sensitivity and specificity, not stratifying for disease aggressiveness. Hence, development and validation of new molecular markers is needed. Aberrant gene prom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreira-Barbosa, Catarina, Barros-Silva, Daniela, Costa-Pinheiro, Pedro, Torres-Ferreira, Jorge, Constâncio, Vera, Freitas, Rui, Oliveira, Jorge, Antunes, Luís, Henrique, Rui, Jerónimo, Carmen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30373654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0564-2
_version_ 1783366440539127808
author Moreira-Barbosa, Catarina
Barros-Silva, Daniela
Costa-Pinheiro, Pedro
Torres-Ferreira, Jorge
Constâncio, Vera
Freitas, Rui
Oliveira, Jorge
Antunes, Luís
Henrique, Rui
Jerónimo, Carmen
author_facet Moreira-Barbosa, Catarina
Barros-Silva, Daniela
Costa-Pinheiro, Pedro
Torres-Ferreira, Jorge
Constâncio, Vera
Freitas, Rui
Oliveira, Jorge
Antunes, Luís
Henrique, Rui
Jerónimo, Carmen
author_sort Moreira-Barbosa, Catarina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers among men worldwide. Current screening methods for PCa display limited sensitivity and specificity, not stratifying for disease aggressiveness. Hence, development and validation of new molecular markers is needed. Aberrant gene promoter methylation is common in PCa and has shown promise as clinical biomarker. Herein, we assessed and compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene panel promoter methylation in the same sample sets. METHODS: Promoter methylation of panel #1 (singleplex-miR-34b/c and miR-193b) and panel #2 (multiplex-APC, GSTP1, and RARβ2) was evaluated using MethyLight methodology in two different cohorts [prostate biopsy (#1) and urine sediment (#2)]. Biomarkers’ diagnostic (validity estimates) and prognostic (disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and progression-free survival) performance was assessed. RESULTS: Promoter methylation levels of both panels showed the highest levels in PCa samples in both cohorts. In tissue samples, methylation panel #1 and panel #2 detected PCa with AUC of 0.9775 and 1.0, respectively, whereas in urine samples, panel #2 demonstrated superior performance although a combination of miR-34b/c, miR-193b, APC, and RARβ2 disclosed the best results (AUC = 0.9817). Furthermore, higher mir-34b/c and panel #2 methylation independently predicted for shorter DSS. Furthermore, time-dependent ROC curves showed that both miR-34b/c and GSTP1 methylation levels identify with impressive performance patients that relapse up to 15 years after diagnosis (AUC = 0.751 and AUC = 0.765, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that quantitative gene panel promoter methylation might be a clinically useful tool for PCa non-invasive detection and risk stratification for disease aggressiveness in both tissue biopsies and urines. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-018-0564-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6206889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62068892018-10-31 Comparing diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene promoter methylation panels in tissue biopsies and urines of prostate cancer patients Moreira-Barbosa, Catarina Barros-Silva, Daniela Costa-Pinheiro, Pedro Torres-Ferreira, Jorge Constâncio, Vera Freitas, Rui Oliveira, Jorge Antunes, Luís Henrique, Rui Jerónimo, Carmen Clin Epigenetics Research BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers among men worldwide. Current screening methods for PCa display limited sensitivity and specificity, not stratifying for disease aggressiveness. Hence, development and validation of new molecular markers is needed. Aberrant gene promoter methylation is common in PCa and has shown promise as clinical biomarker. Herein, we assessed and compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene panel promoter methylation in the same sample sets. METHODS: Promoter methylation of panel #1 (singleplex-miR-34b/c and miR-193b) and panel #2 (multiplex-APC, GSTP1, and RARβ2) was evaluated using MethyLight methodology in two different cohorts [prostate biopsy (#1) and urine sediment (#2)]. Biomarkers’ diagnostic (validity estimates) and prognostic (disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and progression-free survival) performance was assessed. RESULTS: Promoter methylation levels of both panels showed the highest levels in PCa samples in both cohorts. In tissue samples, methylation panel #1 and panel #2 detected PCa with AUC of 0.9775 and 1.0, respectively, whereas in urine samples, panel #2 demonstrated superior performance although a combination of miR-34b/c, miR-193b, APC, and RARβ2 disclosed the best results (AUC = 0.9817). Furthermore, higher mir-34b/c and panel #2 methylation independently predicted for shorter DSS. Furthermore, time-dependent ROC curves showed that both miR-34b/c and GSTP1 methylation levels identify with impressive performance patients that relapse up to 15 years after diagnosis (AUC = 0.751 and AUC = 0.765, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that quantitative gene panel promoter methylation might be a clinically useful tool for PCa non-invasive detection and risk stratification for disease aggressiveness in both tissue biopsies and urines. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-018-0564-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6206889/ /pubmed/30373654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0564-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Moreira-Barbosa, Catarina
Barros-Silva, Daniela
Costa-Pinheiro, Pedro
Torres-Ferreira, Jorge
Constâncio, Vera
Freitas, Rui
Oliveira, Jorge
Antunes, Luís
Henrique, Rui
Jerónimo, Carmen
Comparing diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene promoter methylation panels in tissue biopsies and urines of prostate cancer patients
title Comparing diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene promoter methylation panels in tissue biopsies and urines of prostate cancer patients
title_full Comparing diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene promoter methylation panels in tissue biopsies and urines of prostate cancer patients
title_fullStr Comparing diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene promoter methylation panels in tissue biopsies and urines of prostate cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparing diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene promoter methylation panels in tissue biopsies and urines of prostate cancer patients
title_short Comparing diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene promoter methylation panels in tissue biopsies and urines of prostate cancer patients
title_sort comparing diagnostic and prognostic performance of two-gene promoter methylation panels in tissue biopsies and urines of prostate cancer patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6206889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30373654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0564-2
work_keys_str_mv AT moreirabarbosacatarina comparingdiagnosticandprognosticperformanceoftwogenepromotermethylationpanelsintissuebiopsiesandurinesofprostatecancerpatients
AT barrossilvadaniela comparingdiagnosticandprognosticperformanceoftwogenepromotermethylationpanelsintissuebiopsiesandurinesofprostatecancerpatients
AT costapinheiropedro comparingdiagnosticandprognosticperformanceoftwogenepromotermethylationpanelsintissuebiopsiesandurinesofprostatecancerpatients
AT torresferreirajorge comparingdiagnosticandprognosticperformanceoftwogenepromotermethylationpanelsintissuebiopsiesandurinesofprostatecancerpatients
AT constanciovera comparingdiagnosticandprognosticperformanceoftwogenepromotermethylationpanelsintissuebiopsiesandurinesofprostatecancerpatients
AT freitasrui comparingdiagnosticandprognosticperformanceoftwogenepromotermethylationpanelsintissuebiopsiesandurinesofprostatecancerpatients
AT oliveirajorge comparingdiagnosticandprognosticperformanceoftwogenepromotermethylationpanelsintissuebiopsiesandurinesofprostatecancerpatients
AT antunesluis comparingdiagnosticandprognosticperformanceoftwogenepromotermethylationpanelsintissuebiopsiesandurinesofprostatecancerpatients
AT henriquerui comparingdiagnosticandprognosticperformanceoftwogenepromotermethylationpanelsintissuebiopsiesandurinesofprostatecancerpatients
AT jeronimocarmen comparingdiagnosticandprognosticperformanceoftwogenepromotermethylationpanelsintissuebiopsiesandurinesofprostatecancerpatients